Elder Justice Prosecutor Samples
Alleges: First Cause of Action - Breach of Contract; Second Cause of Action - Fraud
Argues Court must remand for jury trial because: appellant proves malicious prosecution claim; age discrimination violates Nebraska Furniture Mart's contract, estoppel, and wrongful discharge
Argues Court must remand because: judge's past associations question court's objectivity; no order is violated; free speech protects cyber-gripe web sites
Argues: record on appeal incomplete; errors not argued; matters not assigned
Requests Court hold hearing on eviction action because: issue of material fact remains regarding tax deed; issue of material fact remains regarding amounts owed and elderly tax exemption; title analysis is incorrect; court has jurisdiction
Argues Court must reverse decision and remand because: a landlord's desire to sell rental property to a new landlord is not good cause to terminate a tenancy; barring an eviction due to a landlord's identity change protects a tenant from arbitrary or pretextually discriminatory eviction
Argues Court must affirm decision because: Granite State Management & Resources meets charitable exemption standards; real estate is occupied for charitable purposes; income and profits are used for GSMR's charitable purpose; court's decision to strike certain documents does not consitute discretion abuse
Argues Court must reverse decision and dismiss because: claim was barred by statute of limitations; exemption applied to recovery
Recommends Court deny motion and allow deposition into evidence because: statute of limitation has not run; deponent's technical availability is moot; deposition's use is appropriate for impeachment; negative inference can be drawn from fifth amendment invocation; defendant must be estopped from deposition exclusion
Argues Court must vacate judgment because court failed to strike testimony conveying information covered by marital evidentiary privilege
Argues Court must deny order and remand to probate division because: one statute section was interpreted in isolation from its other parts; interpretation nullified statute's purpose
Argues Court must reverse Board of Tax and Land Appeals' decision because a taxpayer's mortgage must not be netted against the value of taxpayer's other assets' to exceed city's established limits
Argues Court must reverse decision because, to calculate net assets, Board of Tax and Land Appeals must deduct taxpayer's mortgage from taxpayer's other assets' value
Argues Court must affirm decision because appellant should have deducted encumbrance on elderly taxpayer's residence in calculating net assets
Argues Court must vacate order invalidating promissory note and mortgage deed or, in the alternative, vacate equal basis property distribution because: mortgage deed was secured by respondent's parents' promissory note; promissory note was parents' gift to respondent; petitioner did not contribute to marital home equity; record did not support imputation of respondent's annual income
Argues Court must affirm judgment because: evidence showed theft by unauthorized taking; evidence showed theft by misapplication
Argues Court must overturn decision and remand to probate court because: proposed ward is liable for legal fees and costs of good faith petitioner in guardianship imposition; probate court must determine legal fees and costs
Recommends Court encourage family members, interested persons, and public officials to pursue guardianship of incapacitated adults unable to seek help from courts and not find petitioners in guardianship proceedings responsible for attorney fees and costs
Argues Court must reverse decision and order judgment in New Hampshire Retirement System's favor because: privacy interests are implicated by payments' disclosure; minimal public interest in disclosure of derivative information must be balanced against government's interest in nondisclosure and retiree's interest in privacy
Argues Court must uphold decision because: New Hampshire Retirment System is a government entity subject to right-to-know law; NHRS retirement payment data are governmental records; disclosure of public records is mandated by right-to-know law
Argues Court must affirm order because: retirees are no longer employees; salaries of public employees may be disclosed without invading their privacy
Argues Court must affirm decision because: expenses claimed were not medical deductions; department properly recertified household; federal regulation compliance was not discriminatory
Argues Court must affirm rulings because record supports fault, property division, and alimony findings
Argues Court must affirm decision because: city allocates between exempt and taxable property uses; property portions not used for religious purpose are properly taxed
Argues Court must reverse decision and remand because: court erred granting motion in limine to exclude parol evidence; court erred dismissing case for de novo trial