Elder Justice Prosecutor Samples
Argues Court must reverse finding and remand because: appellant was detained without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity; appellant was arrested without sufficient probable cause; search subsequent to arrest was unlawful
Argues Court must deny motion for summary judgment because: testator was subject to undue influence; testator was manipulated to divert estate from intended recipients to manipulator
Argues Court must remand with requirement defendants answer or plead because: denial of standing is against public policy; competency is necessary for revokability; tort of intentional interference with expectancy interest may provide a solution
Argues Court must remand with requirement defendants answer or plead because: denial of standing is against public policy; competency is necessary for revokability; tort of intentional interference with expectancy interest may provide a solution
Argues Court must affirm summary judgment dismissing amended complaint with prejudice, grant counterclaim for equitable interest in insurance proceeds and enter judgment in favor of estate and heirs because: agreement contains no method for apportioning purchase price; standing is not required to assert defense; buy-out agreement is unenforceable; option for fixed price and extended time restraints alienation; performance can not enforce contract; estate and heirs are entitled to insurance proceeds
Argues Court must reverse journal entry and judgment and enter judgment that 2011 will is neither valid nor entitled to probate because: appellants met prima facie case on undue influence due to presumption of undue influence; appellees did not rebutt existence of undue influence presumption
Argues Court must affirm journal entry and judgment because: evidence never established presumption of undue influence; 2011 will signing video was allowable evidence for jury review
Argues Court must reverse order dismissing derivative action and remand because Nebraska Nonprofit Corporation Act permits articles and bylaws of an unlicensed residential retirment facility to provide qualifications for directors who thereby have standing to bring derivative action
Alleges: First Claim - Fraudulent Misrepresentation; Second Claim - Fraudulent Concealment; Third Claim - Negligent Misrepresentation; Fourth Claim - Breach of Contract; Fifth Claim - Negligence
Argues Court must reverse rulings because: presumption of capacity and trust amendment must be respected; no evidence presented is sufficient to set aside testator's testamentary capacity to execute the trust
Argues Court must reverse decision because representative: had knowledge of facts constituting prima facie cases of constructive fraud, undue influence and breaches of fiduciary duties warranting recovery; failed to execute fiduciary duty to investigate and recover assets under residuary clause
Argues Court must reverse judgments and remand because genuine issues of material fact regarding infliction of duress on elderly widow exist
Argues Court must reverse decision because: charge is not a criminal offense; prior convictions are not admissible; sentence is excessive
Because fiducairy can not take beneficiary's money on unitemized bills, deny beneficiary a lawyer, not share periodic reports and not make trust accounting, Court must: order appellees provide trust reports and accounting; remand for hearing to contest beneficiary's fees or declare beneficiary's right to object to fees; declare appellee not entitled to any fees; allow beneficiary to prove claim for fees and costs; declare all other fee claims be made at claimant's expense and liability for beneficiary's response; order beneficiary's retainer be fully legal and that attorneys fulfill right and duty of due diligence
Argues Court must affirm orders and dismiss consolidated proceedings because appellant's attorneys never filed a pleading challenging the guardianship, its terms, or guardian's actions
Because estate of an elderly testator is a point of contention for testator's children and multiple representatives of testator's interests and their attorneys, Court must: declare testator has right to select counsel in guardianship/ conservatorship proceedings; vacate order limiting testator's ability to use prior counsel; declare testator's chosen counsel may challenge attorney fees, sue, plan estate and pursue testator's legal rights; declare appellee has forfeited right to fees and require appellee disgorge attorney fees already paid; reverse and remand for evidentiary hearing on fee applications
Argues Court must approve retainer, authorize beneficiary and beneficiary's attorneys to fight fees, discharge conservator, discharge trustee, award beneficiary fees against appellee and strip appellee of all fees because beneficiary under guardianship/ conservatorship retains right to an attorney throughout protected status
Alleges: Medical Malpractice Pursuant to Nebraska Hospital-Medical Liability Act; Professional Negligence Against Qualified Healthcare Providers
Argues Court must vacate sentences and impose just and fair sentences because: sentence is inconsistent with offense's gravity; sentence fails to weigh facts and circumstances
Alleges: Violations of Law Count I - Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act
Argues Court must adopt findings, conclusions and suggested sanction because: evidence of other acts prove respondent's malicious intent; respondent's Minnesota filing creates legal burden for guardian; respondent's in-court outburst is prejudicial; disbarrment is appropriate sanction for respondent's repeated misconduct
Argues Court must reverse decision and remand or, in the alternative, enter judgment for appellants on de novo review because: LLC's agreement did not govern trust; reliance on trust's integrity and summary judgment was improper; relevant portions of trust were omitted in motion for summary judgment; leasing trust's land for loans and crop payment were insider transactions; appellee breached fiduciary duties; trust and LLC attorney fee payments benefitted trust and LLC members; discovery was limited before trial
Argues Court must affirm decision because: summary judgment was correctly entered; counterclaim's legal and factual issues were correctly determined
Argues Court must affirm decision and receive cumulative exhibit into evidence or, in the alternative, appoint a neutral attorney because: decision to exclude cumulative exhibit into evidence is erroneous; appellant must demonstrate need for special administrator appointment
Argues Court must reverse decision or, in the alternative, reduce alimony amount and duration because: appellee can satisfy monthly expenses with personal and investment income; appellant is charged with care of minor son and education for elder son