Elder Justice Prosecutor Samples
Argues Court must strike 2009 Will or, in the alternative, find 2009 Will ambiguous and allow parol testimony because trial court failed to remedy injustice
Argues Court must affirm ruling granting motion to dismiss counterclaim and denying motion for reconsideration because 2009 Will's terms and application are clear
Argues Court must affirm judgment and declare 2005 Will void because there is no evidence of independent consent and action
Argues Court must affirm decisions because: court did not err denying motion for judgment or for new trial; court did not err denying motion for remittitur
Argues Court must affirm ruling because: a constructive trust existed; there were no co-tenants; appellees met burden of proof; expenditure review found funds misappropriated
Argues Court must affirm because ruling allows appellants to retain one-half interest acquired at purchase
Argues Court must remand for punitive damages hearing because: jury was not submitted appellees' punitive damages request; cap on non-economic damages violated separation of powers
Argues Court must declare deed void or, in the alternative, remand because: appellee admitted undue influence and confidential relationship with decedent; appellee presented no evidence and filed no affidavits on inter vivos gifts
Argues Court must reverse decision or, in the alternative, reverse and remand because: decision conflicts with the right to devise a bank account and personal property by executing a Will; court fails to determine decedent's intentions
Argues Court must affirm judgment because: due to undue influence and fraud, deed should revert to estate; appellant states no factual or legal basis to challenge evidence, legality or ruling
Argues Court must affirm decision because: indictment gave appellant notice of charge; the use of a vulnerable adults' resources for another person's benefit was illegal
Argues Court must reverse judgment or, in the alternative, reverse judgment and remand because: one defendant provided no healthcare services to decedent; plaintiffs speculated on cause of death; evidence regarding injuries was speculative; plaintiffs failed to support alleged standard of care breaches; evidence of generalized allegations was insufficient; jury's award was not supported by evidence showing defendants caused injuries; witnesses in compensatory damages phase undermined jury's decision
Argues Court must reverse order or, in the alternative, reverse order and render decision setting aside warranty deed because: appellant acknowledged actions and consequences; court erred denying request for relief under basis of mutual mistake
Argues Court must affirm decision because: findings of fact and order erre based on evidence; appropriate legal standards were applied
Argues Court must reverse decision because: court erred denying motion for relief; appellee failed to consider substitute agreed judgment
Argues Court must reverse ruling because: appellee has not met burden of proof on matters of trust and gift inter vivos; court failed to follow mandated guideline regarding elements for gift inter vivos
Argues Court must reverse case and dismiss indictment because elderly vulnerable person consented to manner in which resources were used
Alleges: breach of contract; fraud; negligence; gross negligence; bad faith; fraudulent concealment; breach of duty; breach of fair dealing; unjust enrichment (2008)
Alleges: fraud; civil conspiracy; conversion; invasion of privacy; negligence; unjust enrichment; gross negligence; aiding and abetting fraud (2007)
Alleges: negligence; medical malpractice; malice; gross negligence; fraud; breach of fiduciary duty; wrongful death (2007)
Requests Court deny motion because: claims' viability in evidence; judgment entitlement unsupported (2006)
Recommends Court deny motion, declare arbitration unconscionable and clause void because: decedent never signed arbitration clause; neither decedent's estate nor plaintiff bound by arbitration (2006)
Alleges: menace; extortion; intentional infliction of emotional and mental distress; negligent infliction of emotional and mental distress; violation of vulnerable adults act; conspiracy; gross negligence; abuse of civil process (2006)
Requests Court deny motion because nursing home licensee is liable for: breach of common law duty of care; non-delegable statutory duty of care; negligence; proximate cause of death; fraud; breach of fiduciary (2006)
Alleges: negligence; abuse; breach of duties; fraud; breach of fiduciary duty; misrepresentation; medical malpractice; malicious conduct; conspiracy; fraudulent conveyance (2005)