Farkas v. Office of the Special Inspector Gen., No. 13-309, 2014 WL 5320540 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2014) (Fox, J.)

Farkas v. Office of the Special Inspector Gen., No. 13-309, 2014 WL 5320540 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2014) (Fox, J.)

Re: Request for records concerning plaintiff

Disposition: Denying plaintiff's motion to compel

• Litigation Considerations:  "The court construed [plaintiff's] Motion to Compel to be asking the court to reopen the case, and either enforce the settlement agreement or restore the case to the active docket."  The court holds that "[b]ased on the information contained in the Government's response and exhibits thereto, . . . reopening this case pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) is not warranted, because there has not been a breach of the Settlement Agreement."  "Although the pace of the document production has not been satisfactory to [plaintiff], the court does not find that any of the circumstances indicate that the Government has failed to comply with the terms of the Settlement Agreement."