Elder Justice Prosecutor Samples
Alleges: negligence; negligence per se; vulnerable adult abuse/neglect/exploitation; wrongful death (2006)
Alleges: undue influence; breach of fiduciary duty; elder exploitation (2005)
Duty of Jury; Lawyers' Comments; Evidence; Reasonable Doubt; Penalty; Credibility; Information; Testimony; Judicial Notice; Definitions; Fraud Scheme; Material Omission (1999)
Requests preclusion of: testimony regarding victim's commitment; testimony regarding identified individual's behavior; testimony regarding county attorney's decision; testimonies by staff, nursing expert, probate expert (1999)
Charges scheme to defraud and financially exploit vulnerable elderly adult (1998)
Requests Court overrule demurrer or, in the alternative, grant leave to amend because cause of action for elder abuse is sufficiently pled, plaintiff had pled neglect with sufficient particularity
Requests Court award and add attorney fees to judgment because defendants are liable for financial elder abuse and plaintiff obtained a unanimous jury verdict
Alleges felony elder abuse or dependant abuse all connected together in their commission, and being two or more different offenses of the same class of crimes or offenses, under fourteen (14) separate counts
Alleges: sexual battery on an institutionalized individual; elder abuse and neglect (2015)
Requests admission of 86 year old victim's out-of-court statements because he will be unavailable to testify at trial (2015)
Requests Court sustain demurrer, dismiss complaint with prejudice, dismiss complaint without leave to amend, expunge lis pendenson property at issue, award costs, fees and appropriate relief because plaintiffs: fail to join a necessary party; cannot sue to enforce government programs; fail to adequately plead consistent allegations; fail to show material facts sufficient to constitute causes of action
Requests Court overrule demurrer or, in the alternative, grant leave to amend complaint to include criminal allegations of financial elder abuse, fraud, wrongful taking, demand for return of property and negligence because allegations of criminal misconduct were not included in civil complaint, statute of limitations defense fails, demurr to preliminary allegations and punitive damages is without merit
Requests Court order judgment in defendants' favor for claims in plaintiff's first amended complaint because action has no merit, there is no triable issue of material fact and defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, defendants move for an order granting summary adjudication in defendants' favor as to plaintiffs first, second and third causes of action and claim for punitive damages
Requests Court overrule defendant's demurrer and deny motion or, in the alternative, grant leave to file a first amended complaint because plaintiff has pled sufficient facts with particularity to place defendant on notice
Recommends Court overrule demurrer in its entirety or, in the alternative, grant leave to amend because plaintiff has: asserted facts sufficient to state elder abuse and willful misconduct causes of action; stated necessary facts to constitute elder neglect and abandonment; sufficiently pled defendants were care custodians; shown decedent was in defendants care and custody at time of injuries
Requests Court sustain demurrer without leave to amend or, in the alternative: deny recovery for elder abuse; allow only one count of (professional) negligence; deny plaintiff-mother recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress; deny dependent adult abuse
Recommends Court not sustain a demurrer to cause of action because defendant is directly liable under California elder abuse laws and vicariously liable throughout plaintiff's 13th Cause of Action; requests, in the alternative, leave to amend 13th Cause of Action should Court deem any portions of claim factually insufficient
Requests Court sustain demurrer without leave to amend because cause of action does not support a claim for elder financial abuse
Requests Court deny demurrer and order defendant to answer Petition within ten days because plaintiffs are decedant's natural children, heirs to the estate, and an accounting was requested within sixty days of the Petition; requests, in the alternative, leave to amend Petition
Requests Court sustain demurrer without leave to amend because: defendant is not liable for employee criminal acts; plaintiff lacks standing; plaintiff fails to plead facts amounting to egregious abuse or neglect; plaintiff fails to factually show recklessness, oppression, fraud or malice; plaintiff's claim for financial abuse is insufficient
Requests Court deny motion or, in the alternative, grant leave to amend because: contract cause of action and breach of merchantability warranty are not barred by statutes of limitations; plaintiffs allege sufficient facts to plead breach of good faith and fair dealing; plaintiffs plead requisite elements of financial elder abuse
Requests Court use defendant's rather than Court's proposed modification of California Civil Jury Instruction 3905A because a jury must be instructed to find all elements of an elder abuse cause of action by clear and convincing evidence
Alleges violations of Elder and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act and breach of fiduciary duty; requests compensatory damages, treble penalties, treble punitive and exemplary damages, prejudgment interest, restitution and disgorgement of profits, attorneys' fees
Argues statute of limitations reaches dates back to plaintiff's second fall because defendants' assessments and reassessments found plaintiff suitable for residency and cause of action did not accrue until plaintiff's legal counsel became aware plaintiff was not suitable and defendants' negligence caused injuries
Argues, as a result of defendants' representations, actions and omissions, plaintiffs lost their entire investment and are entitled to damages for legal malpractice, professional liability, breach of fiduciary duty and elder financial abuse