Skip to main content
Case

United States v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. (M.D. Tenn.)

Overview

On August 1, 2019, the United States filed a complaint and executed a settlement agreement in United States v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. (M.D. Tenn.).  The complaint alleges that Nissan, which provides motor vehicle lending and leasing services, engaged in a pattern or practice of violating Section 3952 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) by repossessing vehicles owned by 113 protected servicemembers without the required court orders.  The complaint also alleges that Nissan engaged in a pattern or practice of violating Section 3955 of the SCRA by failing to refund lease amounts paid in advance in the form of capitalized cost reduction to servicemembers who terminated their leases early following receipt of qualifying military orders.  The settlement agreement requires Nissan to pay $2,937,971 in damages to servicemembers and a $62,029 civil penalty to the United States, for a total of $3 million.  The agreement also requires Nissan to adopt new polices and training to prevent future violations of the SCRA. 

Press Release (8/1/19)

 


Case Open Date
Case Name
United States v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. (M.D. Tenn.)
Topics
Servicemembers Initiative
Civil Rights
Tags
  • Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
  • SCRA
  • military service
  • capitalized cost reduction
  • CCR
  • automobile leases
  • military orders
  • repossession
  • bond
  • prepaid rent
  • lease payments
  • lease termination
  • orders
  • installments
  • deposits
  • equitable disposition
  • motor vehicle
  • deploy
  • 3:19-cv-00658
Industry Code(s)
  • None
Updated September 6, 2022