DOJ Seal U.S. Dep Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"), redacted text redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing, and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; ATR/FOIA-401 (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody, or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers, and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers, and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers, and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly, and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers, and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing, and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal -2- ATR/FOIA-402 prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing, and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust -3- ATR/FOIA-403 Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-404 Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text subsidiary redacted text in connection with a possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division a possible redacted text violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text (hereinafter “the anticompetitive activity being reported”). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the activity upon discovery of the activity, and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or originator of, the activity. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following. (a)providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; redacted text redacted text ATR/FOIA-405 redacted text Page 2 (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the complete, candid and truthful cooperation of its current directors, officers and employees, and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews, grand jury appearances, at trial and other proceedings; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division make no attempt either to falsely implicate or protect any person or entity or intentionally withhold any information; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this agreement in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current Redacted text ATR/FOIA-406 redacted text Page 3 director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Current Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this agreement in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) making his relevant personal documents and records available in the United States to attorneys and agents of the United States without requirement of a subpoena; (b) making himself available in the United States to attorneys and agents of the United States for interviews; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating or protecting any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise giving the United States access to knowledge or information he may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him in such prosecution. redacted text ATR/FOIA-407 redacted text Page 4 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority and Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely redacted text redacted text redacted text ATR/FOIA-408 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text redacted text Re: redacted text Dear redacted text This letter confirms that redacted text has met all of the conditions of the Conditional Leniency Agreement between redacted text and the United States dated redacted text . Therefore, the Division formally accepts redacted text into its Leniency Program. The United States will not criminally prosecute redacted text redacted text or its officers, directors or employees that came forward and met the criteria of Paragraph 8 of the Conditional Corporate Leniency Agreement for any act or offense they may have committed in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported in the redacted text occurring prior to redacted text Sincerely, redacted text ATR/FOIA-409 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text VIA FACSIMILE redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Antitrust Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division conduct constituting criminal violations of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. ATR/FOIA-410 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing, and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody, or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers, and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers, and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers, and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly, and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews, grand jury appearances, and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers, and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported in which redacted text was a participant. 2 ATR/FOIA-411 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing, and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer, or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection for Corporate Directors, Officers, and Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing, and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers, and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; 3 ATR/FOIA-412 (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information not requested in (a)-(c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer, or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority and Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. 4 ATR/FOIA-413 The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text Attachment 5 ATR/FOIA-414 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Gentlemen: This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text subsidiaries (hereinafter redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This Agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported") redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; ATR/FOIA-415 (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or -2- ATR/FOIA-416 former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such -3- ATR/FOIA-417 person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-418 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; ATR/FOIA-419 (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews, and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current director, officer or -2- ATR/FOIA-420 employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. -3- ATR/FOIA-421 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-422 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text including in redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to determine its part in redacted text upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, redacted text 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text redacted text relating to redacted text ATR/FOIA-423 (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to redacted text (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with redacted text as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to redacted text respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews, and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to redacted text make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of redacted text in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with redacted text The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text , the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall 2 ATR/FOIA-424 be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers and Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of redacted text shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with redacted text Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with redacted text without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to redacted text (e) When called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with redacted text redacted text The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the 3 ATR/FOIA-425 event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement; This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority and Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text 4 ATR/FOIA-426 ADDENDUM TO LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN redacted text AND THE ANTITRUST DIVISION OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE It is hereby agreed between redacted text and the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice that the Letter Agreement, signed by redacted text Antitrust Agreement, on redacted text between redacted text and the Antitrust Division is amended to reflect the following: 1. redacted text is an redacted text and is eligible to participate in the Corporate Leniency Program; and 2. redacted text is deemed an employee of redacted text as the term "emoloyee" is used in the Letter Agreement. redacted text ATR/FOIA-427 redacted text DOJ Seal Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and your client, redacted text ("Applicant"), in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon Applicant satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify Applicant in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for Applicant in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: Applicant desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). Applicant represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported redacted text did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the activity. 2. Cooperation: Applicant agrees to provide full, continuing, and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making redacted text available for interviews in the United States upon request of attorneys and agents of the United States; 1 redacted text ATR/FOIA-428 (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that redacted text may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. 3. Individual Leniency: Subject to verification of Applicant's representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to Applicant's full, continuing, and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept Applicant into the Individual Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1994 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against Applicant for any act or offense redacted text may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that Applicant has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Individual Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Individual Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against Applicant, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary information, statements, or other information provided by Applicant to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against Applicant in any such prosecution. 4. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and Applicant, and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division. 2 ATR/FOIA-429 redacted text The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely, redacted text 3 ATR/FOIA-430 redacted text DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text industry for redacted text This Agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text for redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: ATR/FOIA-431 (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. 2 ATR/FOIA-432 Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 3 ATR/FOIA-433 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. redacted text 4 ATR/FOIA-434 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Re: redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text subsidiaries redacted text redacted text redacted text desire to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: ATR/FOIA-435 (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon -2- ATR/FOIA-436 request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection for Corporate Directors, Officers and Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. -3- ATR/FOIA-437 The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority and Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind me respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-438 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text as defined below, in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C § 1, in the redacted text redacted text . This Agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text and any of its subsidiaries that are or have in the past been engaged in the redacted text redacted text desire to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; ATR/FOIA-439 (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or 2 ATR/FOIA-440 former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 3 ATR/FOIA-441 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text 4 ATR/FOIA-442 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text redacted text Re: redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported") redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: ATR/FOIA-443 (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity located in the United States injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional -2- ATR/FOIA-444 acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text as well as former redacted text personnel who do not consult or work, and have not consulted or worked since leaving redacted text for any other redacted text redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States: (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any -3- ATR/FOIA-445 leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-446 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text redacted text subsidiaries redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or to the work-product privilege, except as provided in Paragraph 2(g) below. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act, in the redacted text (“the anticompetitive activity being reported”). redacted text represent to the Antitrust Division that: (a) upon discovery of the anticompetitive activity being reported, it took prompt and effective action to (i) terminate its part in the activity and (ii) come forward and report the activity; and (b) it did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. The representation of redacted text in 1(a)(ii), that it promptly came forward and reported the anticompetitive activity to the Antitrust Division upon its discovery, is critical to the Division’s analysis as to whether redacted text satisfies conditions number 7 of Part B of its Corporate Leniency Program because of the advanced stage of the Antitrust Division’s investigation at the time of the application. In verifying the representation in 1(a)(i) and 1(a)(ii), the Division will pay particular attention to whether authoritative representatives of the company for legal matters had knowledge of the anticompetitive activity being reported prior to redacted text redacted text ATR/FOIA-447 redacted text 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, including, but not limited to the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information that may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers, employees, and redacted text to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers, employees, and redacted text who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews, and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers, employees and redacted text who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) waiving its attorney-client and work-product privileges with respects to (i) any information obtained by redacted text redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (ii) any information obtained by inside or outside counsel for redacted text relevant to the Antitrust Division’s verification of the representation in 1(a)(ii) above; (h) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. redacted text -2- ATR/FOIA-448 redacted text 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of the representations of redacted text in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiated a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such prosecutions be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to the full, continuing and complete cooperation of redacted text the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers, and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials as requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false -3- redacted text ATR/FOIA-449 redacted text statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer, or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supercedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority and Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours redacted text -4- redacted text ATR/FOIA-450