Skip to main content
Case Document

Information

Date
Document Type
Information
Attachments
This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

NIALL E. LYNCH (State Bar No. 157959)
MICHAEL L. SCOTT (State Bar No. 165452)
HEATHER S. TEWKSBURY (State Bar No. 222202)
ALEXANDRA J. SHEPARD (State Bar No. 205143)
DAVID J. WARD (State Bar No. 239504)
Antitrust Division
U.S. Department of Justice
450 Golden Gate Avenue
Box 36046, Room 10-0101
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: (415) 436-6660

 

FILED

Nov 12 2008

RICHARD W. WIEKING /s/
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE

Attorneys for the United States E-Filing  



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA    

                  v.

SHARP CORPORATION,

                  Defendants.


)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
        
Case No. CR 08-0802 PJH

INFORMATION

VIOLATION:
Title 15, United States Code,
Section 1 (Price Fixing)

San Francisco Venue



I.

COUNT ONE - CONSPIRACY TO RESTRAIN TRADE BY PRICE FIXING

The United States of America, acting through its attorneys, charges:

DESCRIPTION OF THE OFFENSE

1. SHARP CORPORATION ("defendant") is made a defendant on the charge stated below.

2. From on or about April 1, 2001 to on or about December 1, 2006, defendant and its coconspirators entered into and engaged in a combination and conspiracy in the United States and elsewhere to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing the prices of thin-film transistor liquid crystal display panels ("TFT-LCD") sold to Dell Inc. ("Dell") for use in computer monitors and laptops. The combination and conspiracy engaged in by the defendant and its coconspirators was in unreasonable restraint of interstate and foreign trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1).

3. The charged combination and conspiracy consisted of a continuing agreement, understanding, and concert of action among the defendant and its coconspirators, the substantial terms of which were to agree to fix the prices of TFT-LCD to be sold to Dell.

4. For the purpose of forming and carrying out the charged combination and conspiracy, the defendant and its coconspirators did those things that they combined and conspired to do, including, among other things:

  1. participating in bilateral meetings, conversations, and communications in Japan and the United States to discuss the prices of TFT-LCD to be sold to Dell;
  2. agreeing, during those bilateral meetings, conversations, and communications, to charge prices of TFT-LCD to be sold to Dell at certain predetermined levels;
  3. issuing price quotations in accordance with the agreements reached; and
  4. exchanging information on sales of TFT-LCD sold to Dell, for the purpose monitoring and enforcing adherence to the agreed-upon prices.
DEFENDANT AND COCONSPIRATORS

5. SHARP CORPORATION is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Japan. During the period covered by this Information, SHARP CORPORATION engaged in the business of producing and selling TFT-LCD to customers in the United States and elsewhere.

6. Various corporations and individuals, not made defendants in this Information, participated as coconspirators in the offenses charged in this Information and performed acts and made statements in furtherance of it.

7. Whenever in this Information reference is made to any act, deed, or transaction of any corporation, the allegation means that the corporation engaged in the act, deed, or transaction by or through its officers, directors, employees, agents, or other representatives while they were actively engaged in the management, direction, control, or transaction of its business or affairs.

TRADE AND COMMERCE

8. TFT-LCD are glass panels composed of an array of tiny pixels that are electronically manipulated to display images. TFT-LCD are manufactured in a broad range of sizes and specifications for use in televisions, notebook computers, desktop monitors, mobile devices, and other applications.

9. During the period covered by this Information, the defendant and its coconspirators sold and distributed TFT-LCD in a continuous and uninterrupted flow of interstate and foreign trade and commerce to customers located in states or countries other than the states or countries in which the defendant and its coconspirators produced TFT-LCD.

10. The business activities of the defendant and its coconspirators that are the subject of this Information were within the flow of, and substantially affected, interstate and foreign trade and commerce.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

11. The combination and conspiracy charged in Count One of this Information was carried out, in part, in the Northern District of California, within the five years preceding the filing of this Information.

II.

COUNT TWO - CONSPIRACY TO RESTRAIN TRADE BY PRICE FIXING

The United States of America, acting through its attorneys, charges:

DESCRIPTION OF THE OFFENSE

12. SHARP CORPORATION is made a defendant on the charge stated below.

13. From on or about September 1, 2005 to on or about December 1, 2006, defendant and its coconspirators entered into and engaged in a combination and conspiracy in the United States and elsewhere to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing the prices of TFT-LCD sold to Apple Computer Inc. ("Apple") for use in iPod portable music players. The combination and conspiracy engaged in by the defendant and its coconspirators was in unreasonable restraint of interstate and foreign trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1).

14. The charged combination and conspiracy consisted of a continuing agreement, understanding, and concert of action among the defendant and its coconspirators, the substantial terms of which were to agree to fix the prices of TFT-LCD to be sold to Apple.

15. For the purpose of forming and carrying out the charged combination and conspiracy, the defendant and its coconspirators did those things that they combined and conspired to do, including, among other things:

  1. participating in bilateral meetings, conversations, and communications in Japan and the United States to discuss the prices of TFT-LCD to be sold to Apple;
  2. agreeing, during those bilateral meetings, conversations, and communications, to charge prices of TFT-LCD to be sold to Apple at certain predetermined levels;
  3. issuing price quotations in accordance with the agreements reached; and
  4. exchanging information on sales of TFT-LCD to Apple, for the purpose of monitoring and enforcing adherence to the agreed-upon prices.
DEFENDANT AND COCONSPIRATORS

16. Paragraphs five through seven are realleged as if fully set forth here.

TRADE AND COMMERCE

17. Paragraphs eight through ten are realleged as if fully set forth here.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

18. The combination and conspiracy charged in Count Two of this Information was carried out, in part, in the Northern District of California, within the five years preceding the filing of this Information.

III.

COUNT THREE - CONSPIRACY TO RESTRAIN TRADE BY PRICE FIXING

The United States of America, acting through its attorneys, charges:

DESCRIPTION OF THE OFFENSE

19. SHARP CORPORATION is made a defendant on the charge stated below.

20. From in or about the fall of 2005 to in or about the middle of 2006, defendant and its coconspirators entered into and engaged in a combination and conspiracy in the United States and elsewhere to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing the prices of TFT-LCD sold to Motorola Inc. ("Motorola") for use in Razr mobile phones. The combination and conspiracy engaged in by the defendant and its coconspirators was in unreasonable restraint of interstate and foreign trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1).

21. The charged combination and conspiracy consisted of a continuing agreement, understanding, and concert of action among the defendant and its coconspirators, the substantial terms of which were to agree to fix the prices of TFT-LCD to be sold to Motorola.

22. For the purpose of forming and carrying out the charged combination and conspiracy, the defendant and its coconspirators did those things that they combined and conspired to do, including, among other things:

  1. participating in bilateral meetings, conversations, and communications in Japan and the United States to discuss the prices of TFT-LCD to be sold to Motorola;
  2. agreeing, during those bilateral meetings, conversations, and communications, to charge prices of TFT-LCD to be sold to Motorola at certain predetermined levels;
  3. issuing price quotations in accordance with the agreements reached; and
  4. exchanging information on sales of TFT-LCD to Motorola, for the purpose of monitoring and enforcing adherence to the agreed-upon prices.
DEFENDANT AND COCONSPIRATORS

23. Paragraphs five through seven are realleged as if fully set forth here.

TRADE AND COMMERCE

24. Paragraphs eight through ten are realleged as if fully set forth here.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

25. The combination and conspiracy charged in Count Three of this Information was carried out, in part, in the Northern District of California, within the five years preceding the filing of this Information.

ALL IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 15, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1.

_______________/s/________________
Thomas O. Barnett
Assistant Attorney General

_______________/s/________________
Scott D. Hammond
Deputy Assistant Attorney General

_______________/s/________________
Marc Siegel
United States Department of Justice
Director of Criminal Enforcement
Antitrust Division

_______________/s/________________
Joseph P. Russoniello      Stretch
United States Attorney       for SPR
Northern District of California
_______________/s/________________
Phillip H. Warren
Chief, San Francisco Office

_______________/s/________________
Niall E. Lynch
Assistant Chief, San Francisco Office

_______________/s/________________
David J. Ward
Michael L. Scott
Heather S. Tewksbury
Alexandra J. Shepard
Attorneys
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
450 Golden Gate Avenue
Box 36046, Room 10-0101
San Francisco, CA 94102
(415) 436-6660
Updated April 18, 2023