W000407
Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:00 PM
Victims' Compensation Fund
Dear Mr. Zwick:
I write to you on behalf of my sister,         , 
who lost her husband,         , at the World Trade 
Center.          is now left to raise their two girls, 
ages three and one, on her own.
I will not delineate what elements of economic and non-
economic damages I believe should be available under 
the fund or whether or not you should permit appeals 
of the Special Master's decisions. Instead, I ask only 
that you fulfill the promise Congress made when the 
fund statute was passed - take care of these families.
In the days immediately following the attack, the days 
when we were combing the city trying desperately to 
find          in one of the many area hospitals, it 
seemed that the City and country couldn't do enough to 
help the families. At the family centers, volunteers 
waited with food and drink and anything else we could 
possibly need. They took care of us. On  television 
various charities asked for donations, celebrities 
held concerts to raise funds; they promised to take 
care of us. My sister was so amazed by the outpouring 
of love and support that even she donated to the Red 
Cross. Everyone promised my sister it would be okay - 
that the country would take care of her and their 
beautiful girls. 
Now, two months later, the country's charities have 
reneged on their promise. After hundreds of hours of 
investigation and a significant amount of groveling, 
my sister has received approximately $30,000 of the 
almost one billion dollars collected, and it does not 
appear that there is anything more on the horizon. 
They are not going to take care of her and her little 
girls.
The reason I tell you this is because the rumors that 
are circulating indicate that the federal government 
is about to walk out on her as well. That the 
regulations to be released in December will so limit 
potential recovery that the fund will become 
meaningless. The statute Congress passed allows for 
potentially realistic recovery - if it is interpreted 
in a manner that emphasizes making the 
families 'whole' rather than in a manner that saves 
the federal government as much money as possible. The 
thought that the government might deduct from her 
recovery the $30,000 she received from various 
charities is obscene.  
It seems as though the promises of help made in 
September were made without much thought, and now, 
after having given it some consideration, our would-be 
saviors are heading for the hills. The country's 
charities have already abandoned the families of 
September 11th, please do not do the same.
Thank you for your consideration.
Individual Comment