W000044
Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:06 AM
Handling Compensation
Until all the people who donated the money know how these funds will be
distributed and when, the other issues cannot be commented on. Why put the
cart before the horse?
If the distribution is equitable, the decision over additional compensation
should be weighed as to how much more is needed.
As for 's comment that lawsuits should be the way to go, I find this selfish, self serving statement one more nail in the coffin of "sleazy
lawyer" perception. If I thought for one minute that lawyers would get
their hands in the pot, I would NEVER HAVE CONTRIBUTED. Furthermore any
recommendation of the Trial Lawyers Association for a choice to oversee the
fund, I view with skepticism---why do they have an opinion and preference?
The first step is to lay out the plan to disburse funds.
The primary assurance must be no one will have to resort to paying a lawyer
to receive any monies.
As to who is entitled, widows/widowers and children are the victims who
will suffer long term from the loss of financial and emotional support.
While other family members will suffer the emotional loss, the majority
will not endure a financial crisis and should not be the focus of aid. I
say this as a mother and sister and aunt.
All life is beyond a dollar value, but I gave money to assist those who
will most suffer from the loss of the financial support.
Let's not lose sight of the intent of most of the contributors. This is not
a Pollyanna.
Individual Comment