1583	Agency, agency records	Forsham v. Mathews, No. 75-1608 (D.D.C. Feb. 5, 1976), aff'd sub nom. Forsham v. Califano, 587 F.2d 1128 (D.C. Cir. 1978), aff'd sub nom. Forsham v. Harris, 445 U.S. 169 (1980).
1584	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidenti
ality	Foster v. DOJ, 933 F. Supp. 687 (E.D. Mich. 1996).
1585	(b)(5), attorney's fees, deliberative process	Foster v. United States Customs Serv., 2 GDS ¶81, 240 (D. Haw. 1980).
1586	(b)(7)(A)	Fotomat Corp. v. NLRB, 573 F.2d 959 (6th Cir. 1978), order enforced, 634 F.2d 320 (6th Cir. 1980).
1587	(b)(6), summary judgment	Found. for Fair Contracting v. Dep't of the Interior, No. 89-071 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 1989).
1588	(b)(2), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), agency, agency records, law en
forcement purpose	Founding Church of Scientology v. Blumenthal, No. 75-1471 (D.D.C. Mar. 30, 1977), subsequent deci
sion (D.D.C. Aug. 11, 1977), summary judgment granted in part sub nom. Founding Church of Sci
entology v. Miller, 490 F. Supp. 144 (D.D.C. 1980), rev'd & remanded sub nom. Founding Church of Scientology v. Regan, 670 F.2d 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 976 (1982).
1589	Discovery in FOIA litigation	Founding Church of Scientology v. FBI, No. 78-
0107 (D.D.C. May 19, 1983).
1590	(b)(1), E.O. 11652, (b)(2), (b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, (b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(B), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), adequacy of agency affi
davit, attorney work-product priv
ilege, deliberative process, referral of request to another agency, Vaughn Index	Founding Church of Scientology v. Levi, No. 75-
1577 (D.D.C. Jan. 24, 1978), rev'd sub nom. Found
ing Church of Scientology v. Bell, 603 F.2d 945 (D.C. Cir. 1979), decision on remand, 1 GDS ¶80, 155 (D.D.C. 1980), rev'd & remanded sub nom. Founding Church of Scientology v. Smith, No. 80-
2049 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 1, 1981) (unpublished memo
randum), 607 F.2d 1234 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (table cite), on remand, 579 F. Supp. 1060 (D.D.C. 1982), aff'd, 721 F.2d 828 (D.C. Cir. 1983).
1591	Attorney's fees	Founding Church of Scientology v. Marshall, 439 F. Supp. 1267 (D.D.C. 1977).
1592	(b)(1), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403, burden of proof, de novo review, duty to search, in camera affidavit, summary judgment, Vaughn Index	Founding Church of Scientology v. NSA, 434 F. Supp. 632 (D.D.C. 1977), rev'd, 610 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1979), on remand, No. 76-1494 (D.D.C. May 19, 1980), aff'd, 2 GDS ¶81,109 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
1593	Discovery in FOIA litigation	Founding Church of Scientology v. Paschall, No. 75-
1397 (D.D.C. Sept. 17, 1976).
1594	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), adequacy of agency affidavit, discovery in FOIA litigation, duty to search, Vaughn Index	Founding Church of Scientology v. United States Marshals Serv., 516 F. Supp. 151 (D.D.C. 1981), on motion for summary judgment, 2 GDS ¶81,314 (D. D.C. 1981).
1595	Reverse FOIA, (b)(4)	Fountainhead Group, Inc. v. Consumer Prod. Safety Comm'n, 527 F. Supp. 294 (N.D.N.Y. 1981).
1596	(b)(5), attorney's fees, deliberative process	Four Corners Action Coalition v. Dep't of the Inte
rior, No. 92-2106 (D. Colo. Dec. 9, 1992) (bench order), attorney's fees granted (D. Colo. July 21, 1993) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted in part (D. Colo. Jan. 4, 1994).
1597	Exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence, expedited processing	Fox v. DOJ, No. 94-4622, 1994 WL 923072 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 1994), appeal dismissed, No. 94-56788 (9th Cir. Feb. 21, 1995), reh'g denied (9th Cir. Mar. 23, 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 810 (1995).
1598	Attorney's fees	Fox v. Dep't of Labor, No. 3:96-423 (E.D. Va. Apr. 3, 1997).
1599	(b)(5), (b)(6), attorney-client priv
ilege, attorney work-product priv
ilege, deliberative process, inter- or intra-agency memoranda, proper party defendant	Fox v. Harris, 1 GDS ¶80,199 (D.D.C. 1980).
1600	Exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence	Fox v. HHS, No. 86-0879 (D.D.C. Apr. 25, 1986).
1601	Publication	Fraga v. Smith, 607 F. Supp. 517 (D. Or. 1985).
1602	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, mootness	Francis v. Office of Hearings & Appeals, No. 4-90-
673 (D. Minn. Mar. 15, 1991).
1603	(b)(1), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403, in camera inspection	Frank v. CIA, No. 77-14 (S.D. Iowa Sept. 2, 1977), remanded, No. 77-1844 (8th Cir. Apr. 4, 1978) (un
published memorandum), 578 F.2d 1383 (8th Cir. 1978) (table cite).
1604	Mootness, no record within scope of request	Frank v. DOJ, 941 F. Supp. 4 (D.D.C. 1996).
1605	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), FOIA/PA interface	Frank v. DOJ, 480 F. Supp. 596 (D.D.C. 1979).
1606	(b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(7)	Frankel v. SEC, 336 F. Supp. 675 (S.D.N.Y. 1971), rev'd, 460 F.2d 813 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 889 (1972).
1607	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, fee waiver (Reform Act), Vaughn Index	Frankenberry v. DOJ, No. 87-3284 (D.D.C. Feb. 23, 1988), fee waiver denied (D.D.C. Feb. 3, 1989), sub
sequent opinion (D.D.C. Sept. 20, 1989).
1608	(a)(1)(D), publication	Franklet v. United States, 578 F. Supp. 1552 (N.D. Cal. 1984).
1609	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidenti
ality, law enforcement purpose, summary judgment	Franklin v. DOJ, No. 97-1225 (S.D. Fla. June 15, 1998) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted (S.D. Fla. June 26, 1998), aff'd, No. 98-5339 (11th Cir. July 13, 1999) (per curiam) (unpublished memorandum), 189 F.3d 485 (11th Cir. 1999) (table cite).
1610	Fed.R.Civ.P. 34, discovery/FOIA interface	In re Franklin Nat'l Bank Sec., Ltd., 478 F. Supp. 577 (E.D.N.Y. 1979).
1611	Reverse FOIA, (b)(4), customary treatment, summary judgment, vol
untary submissions	Frazee v. United States Forest Serv., No. 94-1007 (D. Or. Mar. 8, 1995), aff'd, 97 F.3d 367 (9th Cir. 1996).
1612	(b)(7)(A), waiver of exemption	Freedburg v. Dep't of the Navy, 581 F. Supp. 3 (D. D.C. 1982).
1613	Exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence	Freedom Communications Inc. v. FDIC, 157 F.R.D. 485 (C.D. Cal. 1994).
1614	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), §6103(b), duty to search, exhaus
tion of administrative remedies, summary judgment	Freedom Magazine v. IRS, Nos. 91-4536, 91-4537, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18099 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 1992).
1615	Exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence, expedited processing	Freeman v. DOJ, 822 F. Supp. 1064 (S.D.N.Y. 1993).
1616	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), duty to search, exceptional cir
cumstances/due diligence, expedi
ted processing, in camera inspec
tion, law enforcement amendments (1986), waiver of exemption	Freeman v. DOJ, No. 92-0557 (D.D.C. May 22, 1992), reconsideration denied (D.D.C. June 25, 1992), vacated in part (D.D.C. Oct. 2, 1992), sum
mary judgment granted in part, 1993 WL 260694 (D.D.C. June 28, 1993), on reconsideration (D.D.C. Jan. 26, 1994), summary judgment granted (D.D.C. Apr. 12, 1994).
1617	Discovery in FOIA litigation, duty to search	Freeman v. DOJ, No. 90-2754 (D.D.C. July 12, 1991), summary judgment denied, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19214 (D.D.C. Oct. 16, 1991), subsequent decision (D.D.C. May 31, 1994).
1618	(b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), duty to search, in cam- era inspection, incorporation by reference, jurisdiction, law en
forcement amendments (1986), law enforcement purpose	Freeman v. DOJ, 723 F. Supp. 1115 (D. Md. 1988).
1619	(a)(6)(A), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), duty to search, "Glomar" denial, waiver of exemption	Freeman v. DOJ, No. 85-0958 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 1986), aff'd, No. 86-1073 (4th Cir. Dec. 29, 1986) (unpublished memorandum), 808 F.2d 834 (4th Cir. 1986) (table cite).
1620	Discretionary release	Freeman v. Seligson, 405 F.2d 1326 (D.C. Cir. 1968).
1621	Privacy Act access, (b)(6), (b)(7), attorney's fees, disciplinary pro
ceedings, FOIA/PA interface, law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforcement purpose	Frets v. Dep't of Transp., No. 88-0404, 1989 WL 222608 (W.D. Mo. Dec. 14, 1989), reconsideration denied (W.D. Mo. Feb. 7, 1990), attorney's fees awarded (W.D. Mo. June 7, 1990).
1622	Summary judgment	Frezzo v. FBI, No. 88-5354 (E.D. Pa. June 22, 1989).
1623	Discovery/FOIA interface	Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc., 738 F.2d 1336 (D.C. Cir. 1984).
1624	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Friedman v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, No. 80-C-6389 (N.D. Ill. June 14, 1981).
1625	(a)(2)(C), (b)(2), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(E), attorney's fees	Friedman v. Dep't of Transp., No. C78-957 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 18, 1978), on motion for attorney's fees (N.D. Ga. Jan. 15, 1979).
1626	(b)(1), E.O. 12065, (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, belated classifica
tion, discovery in FOIA litigation, duty to search, exhaustion of ad
ministrative remedies, in camera inspection, law enforcement pur
pose, proper party defendant, Vaughn Index	Friedman v. FBI, No. C78-309 (N.D. Ga. Sept. 6, 1978), on motion for summary judgment, 605 F. Supp. 306 (N.D. Ga. 1981), summary judgment granted, 605 F. Supp. 314 (N.D. Ga. 1984), decision on costs (N.D. Ga. Jan. 8, 1986).
1627	Attorney's fees, exceptional cir
cumstances/due diligence	Friedman v. Kelley, No. 75-965 (D. Or. Apr. 15, 1976).
1628	(a)(2), fee waiver (Reform Act)	Friends of the Coast Fork v. Dep't of the Interior, No. 94-6140 (D. Or. Nov. 10, 1994) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted in part (D. Or. Aug. 18, 1995), rev'd & remanded, 110 F.3d 53 (9th Cir. 1997).
1629	Proper service of process	Fritchey v. United States, No. 93-1613, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16401 (D.D.C. Oct. 11, 1994).
1630	(b)(3), 42 U.S.C. §2000e-8(e), waiver of exemption, waiver of ex
emption (failure to assert in litiga
tion)	Frito-Lay v. EEOC, 964 F. Supp. 236 (W.D. Ky. 1997).
1631	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(e)(7), (b)(7)(C), adequacy of request	Fritz v. IRS, 862 F. Supp. 234 (W.D. Wis. 1994).
1632	Jurisdiction, proper party defend
ant, proper service of process	Fritz v. Locke, No. 93-C-0548 (W.D. Wis. Oct. 26, 1993).
1633	(a)(2)(C), (b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, §7213, displacement of FOIA, equitable discretion	Fruehauf Corp. v. IRS, 369 F. Supp. 108 (E.D. Mich. 1974), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 522 F.2d 284 (6th Cir. 1975), rev'd & remanded, 429 U.S. 1085 (1977), on remand, 566 F.2d 574 (6th Cir. 1977).
1634	(b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403-3(c)(6), "Glomar" denial, waiver of ex
emption	Frugone v. CIA, 169 F.3d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1999).
1635	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, agency records, attorney's fees, discovery in FOIA litigation, exhaustion of ad
ministrative remedies, FOIA/PA interface, in camera affidavit, in camera inspection	Frydman v. DOJ, 3 GDS ¶82,345 (D. Kan. 1981), in camera inspection ordered, 3 GDS ¶82,346 (D. Kan. 1981), supplemental decision, 3 GDS ¶82,347 (D. Kan. 1982), on motion to compel, No. 78-4257, 1990 WL 1483 (D. Kan. Jan. 3, 1990), summary judgment granted (D. Kan. July 11, 1990), recon
sideration granted, 760 F. Supp. 193 (D. Kan. 1991), attorney's fees denied, 852 F. Supp. 1497 (D. Kan. 1994), aff'd, No. 94-3255, 1995 WL 355270 (10th Cir. June 14, 1995) (unpublished order), 57 F.3d 1080 (10th Cir. 1995) (table cite).
1636	Attorney's fees	Frye v. EPA, No. 90-3041, 1992 WL 237370 (D. D.C. Aug. 31, 1992).
1637	(b)(1), E.O. 11652, (b)(5), deliber
ative process	Fulbright & Jaworski v. Dep't of the Treasury, 545 F. Supp. 615 (D.D.C. 1982).
1638	(b)(5), inter- or intra-agency mem
oranda	Fulford v. Moschell, No. 87-0011 (D.D.C. Feb. 18, 1987).
1639	(b)(5), deliberative process	Fulham & Sons v. Pension Benefit Guar. Corp., No. 82-0180 (D. Mass. Nov. 12, 1982).
1640	(b)(5), (b)(7)(D), inter- or intra-
agency memoranda	Fullerton Transfer & Storage, Ltd. v. NLRB, 2 GDS ¶82,202 (N.D. Ohio 1980).
1641	(b)(2), (b)(7), (b)(7)(E), law en
forcement purpose	Fund for a Conservative Majority v. Fed. Election Comm'n, No. 84-1342 (D.D.C. Feb. 26, 1985).
1642	(b)(3), 15 U.S.C. §41, (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C)	Fund for Constitutional Gov't v. FTC, 2 GDS ¶81, 246 (D.D.C. 1981).
1643	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, Fed.R. Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), attorney's fees, exceptional circum
stances/due diligence, Vaughn In
dex	Fund for Constitutional Gov't v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force, No. 76-1820 (D.D.C. Jan. 10, 1977), summary judgment granted sub nom. Fund for Constitutional Gov't v. NARS, 485 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1978), attorney's fees denied, 485 F. Supp. 14 (D.D.C. 1979), reconsideration denied, 485 F. Supp. 15 (D.D.C. 1979), aff'd in part, rev'd in part & remanded, 656 F.2d 856 (D.C. Cir. 1981), on re
mand, 2 GDS ¶82,216 (D.D.C. 1982).
1644	FOIA as a discovery tool, improper withholding, jurisdiction	Fungone v. Reg'l Dir., Bureau of Prisons, No. C75-
2498 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 27, 1976).
1645	(b)(5), (b)(7)(D)	Furr's Cafeterias, Inc. v. NLRB, 416 F. Supp. 629 (N.D. Tex. 1976), rev'd & remanded, 566 F.2d 505 (5th Cir. 1978).
1646	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), (b)(7)(C), summary judgment	Gabel v. Comm'r, 879 F. Supp. 1037 (N.D. Cal. 1994), aff'd, No. 95-15215, 1998 WL 21992 (9th Cir. Jan. 15, 1998) (unpublished memorandum), 134 F.3d 377 (9th Cir. 1998) (table cite).
1647	Jurisdiction	Gabel v. Comm'r, No. C94-0587 (N.D. Cal. June 21, 1994), aff'd, No. 94-16245 (9th Cir. May 5, 1995), 61 F.3d 910 (9th Cir. 1995) (table cite).
1648	Duty to search, exhaustion of ad
ministrative remedies	Gabel v. IRS, No. C 97-1653, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12467 (N.D. Cal. June 25, 1998).
1649	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, proper party defen
dant, waiver of exemption	Gabrielli v. DOJ, 594 F. Supp. 309 (N.D.N.Y. 1984).
1650	Adequacy of request, improper withholding, summary judgment	Gadley v. Bureau of Prisons, No. 83-8732 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 25, 1984).
1651	(b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, summary judgment	Gaensel v. CIA, No. 89-1610 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 27, 1991).
1652	Privacy Act access, (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), FOIA/PA interface, law enforcement purpose, proper party defendant	Gaffney v. BATF, No. 84-1403 (D.D.C. May 13, 1985), subsequent order (D.D.C. June 28, 1985), appeal dismissed, No. 85-5770 (D.C. Cir. May 6, 1986).
1653	Summary judgment	Gala v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 85-1044 (W.D. N.Y. Dec. 9, 1985).
1654	Agency	Gale v. Andrus, No. 77-1349 (D.D.C. Dec. 7, 1978), aff'd, 643 F.2d 826 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
1655	Adequacy of request	Gale v. DOJ, No. 79-2571 (D.D.C. Sept. 26, 1979), rev'd & remanded, 628 F.2d 224 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
1656	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), as
surance of confidentiality, law en
forcement amendments (1986), summary judgment	Gale v. FBI, 141 F.R.D. 94 (N.D. Ill. 1992).
1657	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, proper service of process	Gale v. United States Gov't, 786 F. Supp. 697 (N.D. Ill. 1990).
1658	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, (b)(5), attorney's fees, deliberative proc
ess, in camera inspection, jurisdic
tion, mootness, summary judgment	Galedrige Constr. v. IRS, No. C93-20339 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 1994), attorney's fees denied (N.D. Cal. May 6, 1994), reconsideration denied (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 1994), aff'd, No. 94-16628, 1996 WL 21609 (9th Cir. Jan. 22, 1996) (unpublished memorandum), 74 F.3d 1245 (9th Cir. 1996) (table cite).
1659	(b)(6), personal records, summary judgment, Vaughn Index	Gallant v. NLRB, No. 92-0873 (D.D.C. Nov. 6, 1992), aff'd, 26 F.3d 168 (D.C. Cir. 1994).
1660	Jurisdiction	Gallichio v. Justice Dep't, No. 85-3939 (D.D.C. Dec. 18, 1985).
1661	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidenti
ality, duty to search, law enforce
ment purpose, summary judgment	Galpine v. FBI, No. 99-1032 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 2000).
1662	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, mootness	Gambini v. United States Customs Serv., No. 5:01-
300, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21336 (N.D. Tex. Dec. 21, 2001).
1663	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), in camera in
spection, "mosaic"	Gamez v. DOJ, No. 84-6263 (9th Cir. May 17, 1985) (unpublished memorandum), 762 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1985) (table cite).
1664	(b)(5)	Ganem v. DOJ, No. 85-3796 (D.D.C. Dec. 23, 1986).
1665	(b)(7), law enforcement purpose	Gang v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, No. 76-1263 (D.D.C. May 16, 1977).
1666	(b)(5), (b)(6), deliberative process, "Glomar" denial, waiver of exemp
tion	Gannett River States Publ'g Corp. v. Bureau of the Nat'l Guard, No. 91-0455, 1992 WL 175235 (S.D. Miss. Mar. 2, 1992).
1667	(b)(6), summary judgment	Gannett Satellite Info. Network v. Dep't of Educ., No. 90-1392, 1990 WL 251480 (D.D.C. Dec. 21, 1990).
1668	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assur
ance of confidentiality, attorney work-product privilege, delibera
tive process, law enforcement pur
pose	Gansterer v. DOJ, No. 95-1614 (C.D. Cal. July 6, 1998) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted (C.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 1998).
1669	Duty to search, jurisdiction, proper service of process	Gantt v. Hall, No. 84-2626 (D.D.C. Oct. 18, 1984), dismissed (D.D.C. Dec. 21, 1984), summary affirm
ance granted, No. 84-5937 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 23, 1985).
1670	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidentiality, duty to search, in camera inspection, summary judgment, Vaughn Index, waiver of exemption	Garcia v. DOJ, 181 F. Supp. 2d 356 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).
1671	Pro se litigant	Garcia v. DOJ, No. 87-0909 (D.D.C. Feb. 17, 1988).
1672	Mootness	Gard v. Chairman, Nat'l Credit Union Admin., Nos. 85-2163, 88-958 (D. Colo. May 1, 1989).
1673	(b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, adequacy of agency affida
vit, discovery in FOIA litigation, "Glomar" denial, "mosaic," sum
mary judgment	Gardels v. CIA, 484 F. Supp. 368 (D.D.C. 1980), rev'd on procedural grounds, 637 F.2d 770 (D.C. Cir. 1980), on remand, 510 F. Supp. 977 (D.D.C. 1981), aff'd, 689 F.2d 1100 (D.C. Cir. 1982).
1674	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Garner v. Executive Office for United States Attor
neys, No. 79-2400 (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 2, 1980).
1675	(b)(4), summary judgment	Garren v. Dep't of the Interior, No. 97-273 (D. Or. Nov. 17, 1997) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted (D. Or. Jan. 8, 1998).
1676	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), destruction of records, disciplinary proceedings, fees, improper withholding, moot
ness, proper party defendant, sum
mary judgment, Vaughn Index, waiver of exemption	Garside v. Webster, No. C1-84-1178 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 2, 1985), subsequent decision (S.D. Ohio Oct. 4, 1985), Vaughn Index ordered (S.D. Ohio Oct. 14, 1986), summary judgment granted in part, 733 F. Supp. 1142 (S.D. Ohio 1989), appeal dismissed, No. 90-3023 (6th Cir. Mar. 5, 1990).
1677	Proper party defendant	Gary Energy Corp. v. DOE, 89 F.R.D. 675 (D. Colo. 1981).
1678	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Gasco, Inc. v. DOE, No. 78-0393 (D.D.C. Apr. 21, 1978).
1679	Jurisdiction	Gasparutti v. United States, 22 F. Supp. 2d 1114 (C.D. Cal. 1998).
1680	Jurisdiction	Gassei v. DOJ, No. 91-1031, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18059 (W.D. Okla. Nov. 22, 1991).
1681	(b)(5), agency	Gates v. Schlesinger, 366 F. Supp. 797 (D.D.C. 1973).
1682	(a)(2), adequacy of request, fees, improper withholding, interaction of (a)(2) & (a)(3)	Gaunce v. Burnett, No. 82-2390 (C.D. Cal. May 10, 1985), aff'd, No. 85-5995 (9th Cir. June 13, 1988) (unpublished memorandum), 849 F.2d 1475 (9th Cir. 1988) (table cite).
1683	FOIA as a discovery tool, improper withholding	Gaunce v. Helms, No. 82-4054 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 1983).
1684	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Gaunce v. United States, 1 GDS ¶80,149 (D.D.C. 1980).
1685	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D)	Gay v. DOJ, No. 81-550 (D. Ariz. Oct. 20, 1981), amended (D. Ariz. Oct. 21, 1981).
1686	Agency	Gaydos v. Mansmann, No. 98-5002, 1998 WL 389104 (D.C. Cir. June 24, 1998) (per curiam).
1687	Fees, fee waiver	Gaylor v. FBI, 2 GDS ¶82,241 (D.D.C. 1982).
1688	(b)(4), summary judgment	GC Micro Corp. v. Def. Logistics Agency, No. C91-
4027 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 1992), rev'd & remanded, 33 F.3d 1109 (9th Cir. 1994).
1689	Adequacy of request, attorney's fees, exhaustion of administrative remedies, FOIA/PA interface	Gedden v. United States Postal Serv., 2 GDS ¶81, 369 (S.D. Iowa 1980).
1690	Injunction of agency proceeding pending resolution of FOIA claim	Gen. Cigar Co. v. Nash, 89 L.R.R.M. 2863 (D.D.C. 1975).
1691	Reverse FOIA, (b)(4), summary judgment	Gen. Dynamics Corp. v. Dep't of the Air Force, 822 F. Supp. 804 (D.D.C. 1992), vacated as moot, No. 92-5186 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 23, 1993).
1692	FOIA as a discovery tool, transfer of FOIA case	Gen. Dynamics Corp. v. Dep't of the Army, Nos. 85-
3901, 86-0057 (D.D.C. Jan. 10, 1986).
1693	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(4), duty to disclose	Gen. Dynamics Corp. v. Dunlop, 427 F. Supp. 578 (E.D. Mo. 1976), vacated & remanded sub nom. Gen. Dynamics Corp. v. Marshall, 572 F.2d 1211 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. granted, vacated & remanded, 441 U.S. 919 (1979), on remand, 607 F.2d 234 (8th Cir. 1979).
1694	(b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), delibera
tive process, law enforcement pur
pose, waiver of exemption	Gen. Elec. Co. v. EPA, 18 F. Supp. 2d 138 (D. Mass. 1998).
1695	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, 42 U.S.C. §2133, (b)(4), agency records, discretionary re
lease, mootness	Gen. Elec. Co. v. NRC, No. 80-2244 (C.D. Ill. Nov. 30, 1983), motion to vacate denied (C.D. Ill. June 26, 1984), aff'd in part, rev'd in part & remanded, 750 F.2d 1394 (7th Cir. 1984).
1696	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103	Gen. Foods Corp. v. FTC, 1 GDS ¶80,236 (D.D.C. 1980).
1697	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(4)	Gen. Motors Corp. v. Marshall, 1 GDS ¶80,019 (E.D. Va. 1980), rev'd & remanded, 654 F.2d 294 (4th Cir. 1981).
1698	Attorney's fees, mootness	Gennuso v. DEA, Nos. 96-1697, 96-1760 (D.D.C. Nov. 20, 1996).
1699	(a)(2)	Gennuso v. Huff, No. 93-0768 (D.D.C. July 19, 1993), summary affirmance denied, No. 93-5258 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 22, 1994).
1700	Agency	Georgacarakos v. United States Sentencing Comm'n, No. 93-0657 (D.D.C. Apr. 30, 1993), summary af
firmance granted, No. 93-5165 (D.C. Cir. June 7, 1994).
1701	Pro se litigant	George v. Reese, No. 91-7156 (4th Cir. Jan. 2, 1992) (unpublished memorandum), 952 F.2d 395 (4th Cir. 1992) (table cite).
1702	(b)(7)(C), adequacy of agency affi
davit, in camera inspection	Gerash v. Smith, 580 F. Supp. 808 (D. Colo. 1984).
1703	(b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(D)	Gerico, Inc. v. NLRB, 92 L.R.R.M. 2713 (D. Colo. 1976).
1704	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confidentiality, dis
covery in FOIA litigation, in cam
era inspection, law enforcement purpose, proper party defendant, summary judgment	Germosen v. Cox, No. 98-1294, 1999 WL 1021559 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 1999).
1705	(b)(4), (b)(7)(A), displacement of FOIA	Gersh & Danielson v. EPA, 871 F. Supp. 407 (D. Colo. 1994).
1706	No record within scope of request	Geske v. DOJ, No. 85-0617 (D.D.C. May 30, 1985).
1707	(b)(4), (b)(7)	Getman v. NLRB, 77 L.R.R.M. 3063 (D.D.C. 1971), aff'd, 450 F.2d 670 (D.C. Cir. 1971), stay denied, 404 U.S. 1204 (1971).
1708	Res judicata	Geurin v. Dep't of the Army, No. C89-3980 (N.D. Cal. May 16, 1990), aff'd, No. 90-16783, 1992 WL 2781 (9th Cir. Jan. 6, 1992) (unpublished memoran
dum), 952 F.2d 406 (9th Cir. 1992) (table cite), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 924 (1992), reh'g denied, 504 U.S. 993 (1992).
1709	FOIA as a discovery tool	Ghandi v. Police Dep't, 74 F.R.D. 115 (E.D. Mich. 1977).
1710	Jurisdiction	Giaimo v. IRS, No. 4:94-2463 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 23, 1996).
1711	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D)	Giampaoli v. DOJ, No. 94-1220 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 1994).
1712	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confiden- tiality, law enforcement amend
ments (1986), summary judgment	Gibbs v. FBI, No. 88-0428 (D.D.C. Sept. 27, 1989).
1713	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(e)(7)	Gibbs Int'l, Inc. v. IRS, No. 7:96-996 (D.S.C. Oct. 7, 1996), aff'd, No. 96-2790, 1997 WL 698948 (4th Cir. Nov. 7, 1997) (per curiam) (unpublished memoran
dum), 129 F.3d 116 (4th Cir. 1997) (table cite), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1072 (1998).
1714	(b)(3), 39 U.S.C. §410(c)(6), at
torney's fees, discretionary release	Gibson v. Davis, No. C3-75-316 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 5, 1976), rev'd & remanded, 587 F.2d 280 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 905 (1979).
1715	Agency records	Gideon v. Benson, No. 75-78C (S.D. Ind. July 24, 1975).
1716	(b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(D), deliberative process, FOIA as a discovery tool	Gifford-Hill, Inc. v. FTC, 1975-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶60,674 (D.D.C. 1976).
1717	Attorney's fees, mootness, proper party defendant	Gilbert v. Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 93-1055 (E.D. Wis. Dec. 28, 1994).
1718	Duty to search	Gilbert v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. 97-
2629 (D.D.C. Mar. 23, 1999).
1719	(b)(6), summary judgment	Gilbey v. Dep't of the Interior, No. 89-0801, 1990 WL 174889 (D.D.C. Oct. 22, 1990).
1720	(b)(6), (b)(7)(C), duty to search, fee waiver, "Glomar" denial	Gilday v. DOJ, No. 85-0292 (D.D.C. July 23, 1985).
1721	(b)(1), (b)(3), (b)(7)(F), summary judgment	Gilday v. DOJ, No. 83-0586 (D.D.C. Nov. 21, 1983).
1722	(b)(7), (b)(7)(C), duty to search, exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, jurisdiction, law enforce
ment purpose, summary judgment	Giles v. DOJ, No. 00-1497 (D.D.C. June 4, 2001), subsequent opinion (D.D.C. Nov. 2, 2001).
1723	(a)(1)(D), (a)(2)(C)	Giles Lowery Stockyards v. USDA, 565 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 957 (1978).
1724	No record within scope of request	Gill v. HHS, No. 94-71212 (E.D. Mich. May 25, 1995).
1725	Agency, no record within scope of request	Gillard v. United States Marshals, No. 87-0689, 1987 WL 11218 (D.D.C. May 11, 1987).
1726	Discovery in FOIA litigation, duty to search	Gillin v. Dep't of the Army, No. 92-325 (D.N.H. May 28, 1993), aff'd, No. 93-1825 (1st Cir. Mar. 18, 1994) (unpublished order), 21 F.3d 419 (1st Cir. 1994) (table cite).
1727	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(b)(2), jurisdiction, summary judgment	Gillin v. IRS, No. 90-31 (D.N.H. Apr. 15, 1991), aff'd, 980 F.2d 819 (1st Cir. 1992).
1728	(b)(4), exceptional circumstances/ due diligence, agency, agency rec
ords, failure to meet time limits, improper withholding, jurisdiction	Gilmore v. DOE, 4 F. Supp. 2d 912 (N.D. Cal. 1998), summary judgment granted in part, 33 F. Supp. 2d 1184 (N.D. Cal. 1998).
1729	Exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence, jurisdiction	Gilmore v. Dep't of State, No. 95-1098 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 1996), summary judgment granted (N.D. Cal. June 15, 2000), motion to amend denied (N.D. Cal. July 5, 2000).
1730	Exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence, expedited processing	Gilmore v. FBI, No. C93-2117 (N.D. Cal. July 26, 1994).
1731	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §798, 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), exceptional circum
stances/due diligence, mootness, preliminary injunction, reasonably segregable, summary judgment	Gilmore v. NSA, No. C92-3646, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7694 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 1993), dismissed (N.D. Cal. Sept. 13, 1993), on reconsideration (N.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 1994), summary judgment granted (N.D. Cal. May 6, 1994), aff'd, No. 94-16165, 1995 WL 792079 (9th Cir. Dec. 11, 1995) (unpublished memorandum), 76 F.3d 386 (9th Cir. 1995) (table cite).
1732	(b)(7)(A), injunction of agency proceeding pending resolution of FOIA claim	Gimbel Bros. v. NLRB, 92 L.R.R.M. 2733 (E.D. Pa. 1976).
1733	(b)(1), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403, (b)(6)	Ginsberg v. CIA, 1 GDS ¶80,015 (D.D.C. 1980).
1734	(b)(1), E.O. 11652, (b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, exhaustion of ad
ministrative remedies, Vaughn Index	Ginsberg v. DOJ, No. 77-0532 (D.D.C. Aug. 14, 1978), subsequent decision, 2 GDS ¶81,106 (D.D.C. 1979), on motion for reconsideration, 2 GDS ¶81, 222 (D.D.C. 1980).
1735	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(e)(7), (b)(5), (b)(7)(A), deliberative process	Ginsberg v. IRS, No. 96-2265, 1997 WL 882913 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 23, 1997) (magistrate's recommen
dation).
1736	(b)(5)	Ginsberg v. Richardson, 436 F.2d 1146 (3d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 976 (1971), reh'g de
nied, 403 U.S. 912 (1971).
1737	(b)(2), (b)(7)	Ginsburg, Feldman & Bress v. Fed. Energy Admin., 39 Ad. L. 2d (P & F) 332 (D.D.C. 1976), aff'd, 591 F.2d 717 (D.C. Cir. 1978), vacated pending reh'g en banc, No. 76-1759 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 14, 1978), aff'd, 591 F.2d 752 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. de
nied, 441 U.S. 906 (1979).
1738	Attorney's fees, displacement of FOIA, improper withholding	Ginter v. IRS, 2 GDS ¶81,030 (E.D. Ark. 1980), aff'd, 648 F.2d 469 (8th Cir. 1981).
1739	Attorney's fees	Giordano v. Roudebush, 448 F. Supp. 899 (S.D. Iowa 1977).
1740	(a)(1)(D), (a)(1)(E)	Girard Trust Bank v. United States, 602 F.2d 938 (Ct. Cl. 1979).
1741	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confiden
tiality, attorney work-product priv
ilege, reasonably segregable, sum
mary judgment	Givner v. Executive Office for United States Attor
neys, No. 99-3454 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2001).
1742	FOIA as a discovery tool, jurisdic
tion	Giza v. HEW, 628 F.2d 748 (1st Cir. 1980).
1743	(b)(4)	Glacier Park Found. v. Andrus, 506 F. Supp. 637 (D. Mont. 1981).
1744	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), referral of re
quest to another agency	Glass v. FBI, No. 78-4256 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 1979).
1745	Privacy Act access, (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforce
ment purpose, summary judgment, waiver of exemption	Glick v. DOJ, No. 89-3279, 1991 WL 118263 (D. D.C. June 20, 1991), summary affirmance granted sub nom. Glick v. Huff, No. 91-5214 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 4, 1992).
1746	Jurisdiction	Glick v. Dep't of the Army, No. 91-5213, 1992 WL 168004 (D.C. Cir. June 5, 1992) (unpublished mem
orandum), 971 F.2d 766 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (table cite).
1747	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), §7213, discovery/FOIA interface	Glickman, Luri, Eiger & Co. v. IRS, No. 4-75-303 (D. Minn. Oct. 14, 1975).
1748	(b)(2), (b)(3), 28 U.S.C. §534, (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), agency, attorney's fees, discovery in FOIA litigation, ex
ceptional circumstances/due dili
gence, referral of request to another agency	Globe Newspaper Co. v. DOJ, 2 GDS ¶82,002 (D. Mass. 1980), attorney's fees awarded, No. 77-3301 (D. Mass. Mar. 29, 1985).
1749	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), law enforcement amendments (1986)	Globe Newspaper Co. v. FBI, No. 91-13257, 1992 WL 396327 (D. Mass. Dec. 29, 1992).
1750	(b)(6), summary judgment	Globus v. Dep't of Transp., No. 88-0234 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 1988).
1751	Attorney's fees	GMRI, Inc. v. EEOC, 149 F.3d 449 (6th Cir. 1998).
1752	Summary judgment	Goff v. Dep't of the Treasury, No. 93-7299 (S.D. N.Y. July 28, 1994).
1753	Agency	Goff v. Dillon, No. 98-2042, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11130 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 1998), dismissed, 1999 WL 163066 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 1999).
1754	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Goff v. Treasury Dep't, No. 98 Civ. 3874, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11184 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2001).
1755	FOIA/PA interface, jurisdiction	Gogert v. IRS, No. 86-1674 (9th Cir. Apr. 7, 1987) (unpublished memorandum), 815 F.2d 82 (9th Cir. 1987) (table cite).
1756	(b)(1), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, attorney's fees, Congressional records, duty to search	Goland v. CIA, No. 76-0166 (D.D.C. May 26, 1976), aff'd, 607 F.2d 339 (D.C. Cir. 1978), vacated & reh'g denied, 607 F.2d 367 (D.C. Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 927 (1980).
1757	(b)(2), (b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(8)	Goldberg v. DOJ, No. 75-1934 (C.D. Cal. June 26, 1978).
1758	Fee waiver	Goldberg v. Dep't of State, No. 85-1496 (D.D.C. Apr. 29, 1986), amended (D.D.C. July 25, 1986).
1759	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, (b)(2), (b)(5), belated classification, deliberative process, summary judgment	Goldberg v. Dep't of State, No. 85-1497 (D.D.C. May 30, 1986), aff'd, 818 F.2d 71 (D.C. Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 904 (1988).
1760	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product privilege, delibera
tive process	Goldberg v. United States, No. 75-1933 (C.D. Cal. May 30, 1978).
1761	(b)(4), (b)(6), (b)(8)	Goldberg v. United States, No. 75-2347 (C.D. Cal. June 10, 1976).
1762	Burden of proof	Goldblum v. DOJ, 3 GDS ¶82,415 (W.D. Pa. 1982).
1763	Agency records, jurisdiction	Goldgar v. Office of Admin., Executive Office of the President, No. 93-1402 (E.D. La. Sept. 10, 1993), aff'd, 26 F.3d 32 (5th Cir. 1994), reh'g denied, 32 F.3d 568 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1079 (1995).
1764	(b)(2), (b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(e)(7), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), displacement of FOIA, law en
forcement purpose, reasonably segregable	Goldsborough v. IRS, No. 81-1939, 1984 WL 612 (D. Md. May 10, 1984).
1765	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, res judicata	Goldsborough v. IRS, 2 GDS ¶82,222 (D. Md. 1980), subsequent decision, 2 GDS ¶82,223 (D. Md. 1982).
1766	(b)(7), (b)(7)(A), law enforcement purpose	Goldschmidt v. USDA, 557 F. Supp. 274 (D.D.C. 1983).
1767	(b)(4), summary judgment	Goldstein v. HHS, No. 92-2013 (S.D. Fla. May 21, 1993) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted (S.D. Fla. July 20, 1993).
1768	(b)(4), adequacy of agency affida
vit, Vaughn Index, waiver of ex
emption	Goldstein v. ICC, 3 GDS ¶83,226 (D.D.C. 1983), partial summary judgment granted, No. 82-1511, 1984 WL 3228 (D.D.C. July 20, 1984), partial sum
mary judgment granted, 1984 WL 3228 (D.D.C. July 31, 1985).
1769	Attorney's fees	Goldstein v. Levi, 415 F. Supp. 303 (D.D.C. 1976).
1770	(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), (b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confidentiality, delib
erative process, law enforcement purpose, referral of request to another agency, summary judg
ment, waiver of exemption	Goldstein v. Office of Indep. Counsel, No. 87-2028 (D.D.C. July 28, 1988), on in camera inspection, 1999 WL 570862 (D.D.C. July 29, 1999) (magis
trate's recommendation).
1771	Summary judgment	Gomez v. DOJ, No. 87-0910 (D.D.C. Oct. 26, 1987).
1772	(b)(2), (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §§2510-
2518, §3123(d), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidentiality, duty to search, in camera inspection, law enforce
ment amendments (1986), no record within scope of request	Gomez v. United States Attorney, No. 93-2530 (D. D.C. Apr. 1, 1996), dismissed, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6439 (D.D.C. May 13, 1996), appeal volun
tarily dismissed, No. 96-5185 (D.C. Cir. May 12, 1997).
1773	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, proper party defendant	Gonser v. United States, No. 00CV2983, 2001 WL 721818 (N.D. Ga. May 17, 2001).
1774	(b)(2), (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §2511(2), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confidentiality, FOIA/ PA interface, law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforce
ment purpose, summary judgment	Gonzalez v. DOJ, No. 88-0913, 1988 WL 120841 (D.D.C. Oct. 25, 1988).
1775	Duty to search	Gonzalez v. DOJ, No. 88-1493 (D.D.C. Jan. 11, 1989).
1776	Exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence, expedited processing	Gonzalez v. DEA, 2 GDS ¶81,016 (D.D.C. 1980), subsequent decision, No. 80-2360 (D.D.C. Mar. 12, 1982).
1777	(b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (c)(2), duty to search, "Glomar" denial, proper party defendant, summary judg
ment, Vaughn Index	Gonzalez v. FBI, No. 99-5789 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2000), aff'd, 14 Fed. Appx. 916 (9th Cir. 2001).
1778	Discovery in FOIA litigation	Gonzalez v. Huff, No. 93-1956 (D.D.C. June 2, 1994).
1779	(b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidenti
ality, attorney work-product priv
ilege, injunction of agency pro
ceeding pending resolution of FOIA claim	Goodfriend W. Corp. v. Fuchs, 411 F. Supp. 454 (D. Mass. 1976), rev'd, 535 F.2d 145 (1st Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 (1976).
1780	(b)(7)(A), discovery/FOIA inter
face, summary judgment, waiver of exemption	Goodman v. Dep't of Labor, No. 01-515, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22748 (D. Or. Dec. 12, 2001) (magis
trate's recommendation).
1781	Privacy Act access, attorney's fees	Gordon v. NASA, 582 F. Supp. 274 (D.D.C. 1984), aff'd, 750 F.2d 1093 (D.C. Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1010 (1985).
1782	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), law enforce
ment amendments (1986), sum
mary judgment	Gordon v. Thornberg, 790 F. Supp. 374 (D.R.I. 1992).
1783	Privacy Act access	Gorod v. IRS, 43 A.F.T.R. 2d 79-678 (D. Mass. 1979).
1784	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, "mosaic," sum
mary judgment, waiver of exemp
tion	Gottesdiener v. United States Secret Serv., No. 86-
0576 (D.D.C. Feb. 21, 1989).
1785	Vaughn Index, waiver of exemp
tion	Gough v. FBI, No. 83-008 (D. Alaska Dec. 27, 1983).
1786	(b)(7), (b)(7)(A), FOIA as a dis
covery tool, law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforce
ment purpose, summary judgment	Gould Inc. v. GSA, 688 F. Supp. 689 (D.D.C. 1988).
1787	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), (b)(7)(C), duty to search, exhaus
tion of administrative remedies, Vaughn Index	Goulding v. IRS, No. 97 C 5628, 1998 WL 325202 (N.D. Ill. June 8, 1998), on in camera inspection (N.D. Ill. July 30, 1998).
1788	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(E), attor
ney's fees, deliberative process, summary judgment, Vaughn Index	Goulding v. IRS, No. 94 C 5113, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18424 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 10, 1996), attorney's fees denied, 1997 WL 47450 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 30, 1997).
1789	Vaughn Index	Gov't Accountability Project v. DOJ, No. 87-1723 (D.D.C. Aug. 20, 1987).
1790	(b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, attor
ney's fees, deliberative process, in camera inspection, voluntary sub
missions	Gov't Accountability Project v. NRC, Nos. 86-1976, 86-3201 (D.D.C. June 30, 1993).
1791	Vaughn Index	Gov't Accountability Project v. NRC, No. 87-2053 (D.D.C. Aug. 13, 1987).
1792	Discovery in FOIA litigation, Vaughn Index	Gov't Accountability Project v. NRC, No. 84-2554 (D.D.C. Jan. 9, 1985) (consolidated).
1793	Privacy Act access, (b)(5), attorney work-product privilege, delibera
tive process, reasonably segregable	Gov't Accountability Project v. Office of the Special Counsel, No. 87-0235, 1988 WL 21394 (D.D.C. Feb. 22, 1988).
1794	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Gov't Employees' Advisors & Representatives, Inc. v. Dep't of Labor, No. 4-85-498 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 1986).
1795	(b)(5), commercial privilege, de
liberative process, discovery/FOIA interface	Gov't Land Bank v. GSA, No. 80-1203 (D. Mass. June 26, 1981), vacated & remanded, 671 F.2d 663 (1st Cir. 1982).
1796	(b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(4), agency records, attorney's fees	Gov't Sales Consultants, Inc. v. GSA, No. 77-1294 (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 1979), attorney's fees denied, 1 GDS ¶80,093 (D.D.C. 1980).
1797	(b)(7)(A), FOIA as a discovery tool	Grabinski v. IRS, 478 F. Supp. 486 (E.D. Mo. 1979).
1798	Duty to search	Grace v. Dep't of Navy, No. C 99-4306, 2001 WL 940908 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2001).
1799	Jurisdiction	Grace v. Lavalle, No. 91-6771 (E.D. Pa. May 4, 1992).
1800	Privacy Act access, (b)(7)(C), at
torney's fees, mootness	Graham v. DOD, No. 96-1111 (D. Md. Nov. 13, 1996).
1801	(b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confiden
tiality, deliberative process, duty to search, in camera inspection, inter- or intra-agency memoranda, per
sonal records	Grand Cent. Partnership, Inc. v. Cisneros, No. 96-
8238 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 1997), on in camera in
spection (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 1997), aff'd in part, rev'd in part sub nom. Grand Cent. Partnership v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999).
1802	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), exceptional circum
stances/due diligence, expedited processing, FOIA as a discovery tool, proper party defendant	Grandison v. DEA, No. 81-1001 (D.D.C. July 9, 1981), summary judgment granted (D.D.C. Jan. 15, 1982).
1803	Dismissal for failure to prosecute	Grandison v. Info. Div., DOJ, No. 81-1306 (D. Md. May 19, 1983).
1804	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e)	In re Grand Jury Investigation, Ven-Fuel, 510 F. Supp. 1047 (D.D.C. 1979).
1805	(b)(7)	In re Grand Jury Witness Subpoenas, 370 F. Supp. 1282 (S.D. Fla. 1974).
1806	(b)(5), (b)(7)(A), attorney work-
product privilege, deliberative process	Grand Labs., Inc. v. HHS, 3 GDS ¶82,306 (D.D.C. 1982).
1807	(b)(6), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confiden
tiality, FOIA as a discovery tool	Grand Labs., Inc. v. USDA, 3 GDS ¶82,277 (D. D.C. 1979), aff'd, 3 GDS ¶82,278 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
1808	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Grange v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 84-0997 (D. Ariz. July 24, 1985).
1809	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Graphics of Key W., Inc. v. United States, No. N-93-
718, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1888 (D. Nev. Feb. 5, 1996).
1810	Attorney's fees	Grasheim v. FBI, No. 98-6768 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2000).
1811	(b)(5), (b)(6)	Grassetti v. Weinberger, 408 F. Supp. 142 (N.D. Cal. 1976).
1812	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(e)(7), (b)(7)(A), displacement of FOIA	Grasso v. IRS, 785 F.2d 70 (3d Cir. 1986).
1813	(b)(5), (b)(7)(C), attorney work-
product privilege, duty to search, law enforcement amendments (1986), reasonably segregable, re
ferral of request to another agency, res judicata	Gray v. DOJ, No. 92-0775 (D.D.C. Sept. 24, 1993), summary judgment granted (D.D.C. Aug. 1, 1994).
1814	(b)(6), waiver of exemption	Gray v. Farmers Home Admin., No. 84-4451 (D. D.C. Aug. 6, 1985).
1815	Privacy Act access, (b)(7)(C), Vaughn Index	Gray v. FBI, No. 4:00-945 (E.D. Mo. Apr. 9, 2001).
1816	Attorney's fees	Gray v. USDA, No. 91-1383 (D.D.C. Nov. 25, 1991), attorney's fees denied (D.D.C. Mar. 27, 1992).
1817	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(b)(2), ade
quacy of request	Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett v. IRS, No. 4-
90-210, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18799 (D. Minn. Dec. 18, 1990).
1818	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), (b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), deliberative proc
ess, discovery in FOIA litigation, law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforcement purpose	Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett v. IRS, No. 4-
90-377 (D. Minn. Nov. 15, 1990) (magistrate's rec
ommendation), summary judgment granted in part (D. Minn. May 23, 1991).
1819	(b)(5)	Grayson v. DOJ, No. 85-2640 (D.D.C. Oct. 17, 1986).
1820	(b)(5)	Grayson v. DOJ, No. 85-2641 (D.D.C. Oct. 17, 1986).
1821	Jurisdiction, mootness	Grayson v. DOJ, No. 84-3651 (D.D.C. May 28, 1985).
1822	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), attor
ney work-product privilege, delib
erative process, duty to search, exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence, exhaustion of administra
tive remedies, in camera inspec
tion, summary judgment	Grecco v. DOJ, No. 97-0419 (D.D.C. Aug. 24, 1998), summary judgment granted (D.D.C. Apr. 1, 1999), subsequent opinion (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2000).
1823	(b)(1), E.O. 12065, E.O. 12356, (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), dis
covery in FOIA litigation, in cam
era inspection	Green v. Def. Intelligence Agency, No. 82-101 (D. Vt. June 3, 1983), partial summary judgment granted (D. Vt. Sept. 28, 1984).
1824	(b)(3), 50 U.S.C. app. §2403(b), (b)(4), attorney's fees	Green v. Dep't of Commerce, No. 77-0363 (D.D.C. Nov. 15, 1977), subsequent decision, 468 F. Supp. 691 (D.D.C. 1979), aff'd in part, No. 79-1509 (D.C. Cir. 1979), appeal dismissed, 618 F.2d 836 (D.C. Cir. 1980), judgment modified, 489 F. Supp. 977 (D.D.C. 1980), attorney's fees granted, 3 GDS ¶82,514 (D. D.C. 1981).
1825	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, (b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), adequacy of agency affidavit, assurance of con
fidentiality, deliberative process, in camera affidavit, law enforcement amendments (1986), Vaughn Index	Green v. Dep't of State, No. 85-0504 (D.D.C. Apr. 17, 1990), subsequent order (D.D.C. June 20, 1990).
1826	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), attorney-client privilege, proper party defendant, reasonably segregable, summary judgment	Green v. DEA, No. 98-0728 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 1999), summary affirmance granted in part, No. 99-
5356, 2000 WL 271988 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 17, 2000).
1827	(a)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), agency, attorney's fees, interaction of (a)(2) & (a)(3)	Green v. FBI, No. 89-699-5 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 1992), attorney's fees granted (E.D.N.C. July 30, 1992).
1828	Privacy Act access, (b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), §6103(e)(7), (b)(5), attorney-client privilege, deliberative process, displacement of FOIA, Vaughn Index	Green v. IRS, 556 F. Supp. 79 (N.D. Ind. 1982), aff'd, No. 83-1107 (7th Cir. Apr. 3, 1984) (unpublish
ed memorandum), 734 F.2d 18 (7th Cir. 1984) (table cite).
1829	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, displace
ment of FOIA	Green v. IRS, 47 A.F.T.R. 2d 81-1261, 2 GDS ¶81, 245 (S.D. Ind. 1981).
1830	(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403, in camera inspection, Vaughn Index	Green v. Kissinger, No. 76-C-3899 (N.D. Ill. July 22, 1977).
1831	(b)(4), (b)(7), law enforcement purpose	Green v. Kleindienst, 378 F. Supp. 1397 (D.D.C. 1974).
1832	No improper withholding	Green v. NARA, 992 F. Supp. 811 (E.D. Va. 1998).
1833	(b)(5), attorney's fees, deliberative process, in camera inspection, summary judgment	Green v. NLRB, No. 90-936 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 11, 1991), aff'd, No. 91-1177 (8th Cir. July 31, 1991) (unpublished memorandum), 950 F.2d 727 (8th Cir. 1991) (table cite).
1834	(b)(6), dismissal for failure to pros
ecute, summary judgment	Green v. United States, 8 F. Supp. 2d 983 (W.D. Mich. 1998), appeal dismissed , No. 98-1568 (6th Cir. Aug. 11, 1998).
1835	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, E.O. 12958, (b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, deliberative proc
ess, discretionary disclosure, duty to search, exhaustion of adminis
trative remedies, "Glomar" denial, referral of request to another agen
cy	Greenberg v. Dep't of Treasury, 10 F. Supp. 2d 3 (D. D.C. 1998).
1836	Duty to search	Greenberg v. FBI, No. 92-2218 (D.D.C. Sept. 15, 1993).
1837	(b)(4), summary judgment	Greenberg v. FDA, No. 83-2874 (D.D.C. Aug. 2, 1984), aff'd, 775 F.2d 1169 (D.C. Cir. 1985), vaca
ted, No. 84-5672 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 6, 1986), rev'd & re
manded, 803 F.2d 1213 (D.C. Cir. 1986), reh'g en banc denied (D.C. Cir. Jan. 8, 1987).
1838	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, jurisdiction, no improper withholding	Greene v. FBI, No. 92-3401 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 1993).
1839	Agency	Greene v. Wieking, No. C 98-01393, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11714 (N.D. Cal. July 31, 1998).
1840	Discovery/FOIA interface	Greene County Planning Bd. v. FPC, 559 F.2d 1227 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 (1978).
1841	Discovery/FOIA interface	Greenfield & Chimicles v. DOE, 561 F. Supp. 97 (E.D. Pa. 1983).
1842	(b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), "Glomar" denial, law enforcement amend
ments (1986), law enforcement purpose, summary judgment	Greenpeace U.S.A., Inc. v. EPA, 735 F. Supp. 13 (D. D.C. 1990).
1843	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, Fed.R. Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), deliberative process, duty to search, exception
al circumstances/due diligence, ex
haustion of administrative reme
dies, fee waiver, jurisdiction, rea
sonably segregable	Greenspun v. Attorney Gen. of the United States, No. 84-3427 (D.D.C. June 17, 1985), partial sum
mary judgment granted (D.D.C. Aug. 26, 1985), partial summary judgment granted (D.D.C. Mar. 3, 1986).
1844	Privacy Act access, (b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(b)(2), Fed.R.Crim. P. 6(e), (b)(7)(C), adequacy of agency affidavit, duty to search, judicial records, pro se litigant, reasonably segregable	Greenspun v. Comm'r, No. 84-3426 (D.D.C. June 26, 1985), renewed motion for summary judgment granted, 622 F. Supp. 551 (D.D.C. 1985).
1845	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(3), 5 U.S.C. §552a(j)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), adequacy of agency af
fidavit, assurance of confidential
ity, expedited processing, FOIA/ PA interface	Greentree v. DEA, 1 GDS ¶80,201 (D.D.C. 1980), summary judgment granted, 2 GDS ¶81,224 (D. D.C. 1981), rev'd, 674 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (consolidated), subsequent decision, No. 80-1007 (D.D.C. Nov. 29, 1983).
1846	Privacy Act access, (b)(3), 5 U.S.C. §552a(j)(2), FOIA/PA interface	Greentree v. United States Customs Serv., 515 F. Supp. 1145 (D.D.C. 1981), rev'd, 674 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (consolidated), dismissed, No. 80-1869 (D.D.C. Aug. 22, 1983).
1847	Adequacy of request, summary judgment	Greer v. Dep't of the Army, 3 GDS ¶83,187 (D.D.C. 1983).
1848	(b)(7)(D)	Gregg v. IRS, 1 GDS ¶80,056 (D.D.C. 1980).
1849	(b)(4), (b)(5), deliberative process	Gregory v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 496 F. Supp. 342 (D.D.C. 1980).
1850	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(8), attor
ney-client privilege, attorney's fees, deliberative process, law enforce
ment purpose	Gregory v. FDIC, 470 F. Supp. 1329 (D.D.C. 1979), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 631 F.2d 896 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
1851	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, §6110, displacement of FOIA	Grenier v. IRS, 449 F. Supp. 834 (D. Md. 1978).
1852	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, FOIA as a dis
covery tool, in camera affidavit, res judicata, summary judgment	Greyshock v. United States Coast Guard, No. 94-
0563 (D. Haw. May 9, 1995), summary judgment granted (D. Haw. Jan. 24, 1996), aff'd in part, rev'd in part & remanded, No. 96-15266, 1997 WL 51514 (9th Cir. Feb. 6, 1997) (unpublished memorandum), 107 F.3d 16 (9th Cir. 1997) (table cite).
1853	(b)(5), deliberative process, incor
poration by reference, summary judgment	Greyson v. McKenna & Cuneo, 879 F. Supp. 1065 (D. Colo. 1995).
1854	Agency, discovery in FOIA litiga
tion, duty to search	Greytok v. Clinton, No. 94-430 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 20, 1994).
1855	Fee waiver	Griffin v. DOJ, No. 83-1634 (D.D.C. Jan. 6, 1984).
1856	Attorney's fees	Griffin v. Dep't of Labor, 3 GDS ¶82,340 (N.D. Ill. 1981).
1857	Mootness	Griffin v. INS, No. 83-9213 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 26, 1985).
1858	Jurisdiction	Griffith v. IRS, No. 95-20526, 1995 WL 853038 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 1995).
1859	(b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), attorney work-product privilege, deliberative process, law enforce
ment amendments (1986), law en
forcement purpose	Grine v. Coombs, No. 95-342, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19578 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 1997).
1860	Jurisdiction	Grissom v. NLRB, 364 F. Supp. 1151 (M.D. La. 1973), aff'd sub nom. NLRB v. Big Three Indus., 497 F.2d 43 (5th Cir. 1974).
1861	(b)(5), attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product privilege, in camera inspection	Grolier Inc. v. FTC, 2 GDS ¶82,186 (D.D.C. 1980), in camera inspection ordered, 1 GDS ¶80,245 (D. D.C. 1980), aff'd in part, rev'd in part & remanded, 671 F.2d 553 (D.C. Cir. 1982), reh'g en banc denied, 3 GDS ¶82,472 (D.C. Cir. 1982), rev'd, 462 U.S. 19 (1983).
1862	(b)(5), attorney work-product privilege, deliberative process, dis
covery in FOIA litigation, duty to search	Grolier Inc. v. FTC, No. 76-1559 (D.D.C. Dec. 13, 1976), renewed motion for summary judgment grant
ed (D.D.C. Mar. 10, 1978).
1863	Attorney's fees	Grooms v. Snyder, 474 F. Supp. 380 (N.D. Ind. 1979).
1864	(b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Grossman v. McMillan, 76-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) ¶9490 (S.D. Fla. 1976).
1865	(b)(1), E.O. 12065, attorney's fees, duty to search	Ground Saucer Watch, Inc. v. CIA, 1 GDS ¶80,128 (D.D.C. 1980), aff'd, 692 F.2d 770 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
1866	(b)(5), (b)(7)(C), duty to search, exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, FOIA/PA interface, law en
forcement amendments (1986), no record within scope of request, re
ferral of request to another agency	Grove v. CIA, 752 F. Supp. 28 (D.D.C. 1990), sum
mary judgment granted in part sub nom. Grove v. DOJ, 802 F. Supp. 506 (D.D.C. 1992).
1867	Preliminary injunction	Grove Press, Inc. v. CIA, 398 F. Supp. 1139 (S.D. N.Y. 1975).
1868	Adequacy of request, duty to search, exhaustion of administra
tive remedies	Grove Press, Inc. v. DOJ, No. 75-6204 (S.D.N.Y. June 12, 1979).
1869	Attorney's fees	Grumman Aerospace Corp. v. United States, 579 F.2d 586 (Ct. Cl. 1978).
1870	(a)(2)(A), (b)(4), (b)(5), agency, deliberative process, inter- or intra-
agency memoranda	Grumman Aircraft Eng'g Corp. v. Renegotiation Bd., 425 F.2d 578 (D.C. Cir. 1970), on remand, 325 F. Supp. 1146 (D.D.C. 1971), aff'd, 482 F.2d 710 (D.C. Cir. 1973), rev'd, 421 U.S. 168 (1975), vacated, 515 F.2d 1017 (D.C. Cir. 1975).
1871	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 15 U.S.C. §2055, improper withholding	GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumer Prod. Safety Comm'n, 443 F. Supp. 1152 (D. Del. 1977), aff'd, 598 F.2d 790 (3d Cir. 1979), aff'd, 447 U.S. 102 (1980).
1872	Attorney's fees, exhaustion of ad
ministrative remedies, FOIA as a discovery tool	Guam Contractors Ass'n v. Dep't of Labor, 570 F. Supp. 163 (N.D. Cal. 1983).
1873	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, FOIA/PA interface, in camera inspection	Guccione v. Nat'l Indian Gaming Comm'n, No. 98-
164, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15475 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 1999).
1874	(b)(5), attorney work-product priv
ilege, deliberative process, inter- or intra-agency memoranda	Guckian v. GSA, No. 75-2156, 38 Ad. L. 2d (P & F) 1061 (D.D.C. 1976), remanded with instructions to vacate, No. 76-1410 (D.C. Cir. July 8, 1976).
1875	Privacy Act access	Guerra v. Bell, No. 78-1509 (D.D.C. Mar. 23, 1979).
1876	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(4)	Guerra v. Guajardo, 466 F. Supp. 1046 (S.D. Tex. 1978), aff'd, 597 F.2d 769 (5th Cir. 1979).
1877	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidenti
ality, in camera inspection	Guerrero v. DEA, No. 93-2006 (D. Ariz. Feb. 21, 1996).
1878	Summary judgment	Guillette v. BATF, No. 83-2079 (D.D.C. Dec. 19, 1983).
1879	Privacy Act access, (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidenti
ality, law enforcement amend
ments (1986), waiver of exemption	Gula v. Meese, 699 F. Supp. 956 (D.D.C. 1988).
1880	(b)(4), waiver of exemption	Gulf & W. Indus. v. United States, No. 77-1816 (D. D.C. June 1, 1978), aff'd, 615 F.2d 527 (D.C. Cir. 1979).
1881	Reverse FOIA, preliminary injunc
tion	Gulf Apparel Corp. v. United States, No. 82-356 (M.D. Ala. May 10, 1982), dismissed by stipulation (M.D. Ala. Aug. 23, 1983).
1882	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(4), case or controversy, mootness	Gulf Oil Corp. v. Marshall, 1 GDS ¶79,163 (D.D.C. 1979), rev'd & remanded sub nom. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Brock, 778 F.2d 834 (D.C. Cir. 1985).
1883	(a)(1)	Gulf States Mfrs. v. NLRB, 579 F.2d 1298 (5th Cir. 1978).
1884	(b)(4), preliminary injunction	Gulf States Steel v. Sec'y, Dep't of Labor, No. 1:94-
2760 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 15, 1994).
1885	(a)(1)(D)	Gunter v. Comptroller of the Currency, No. C78-792 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 1, 1978).
1886	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality	Gutman v. Kelley, No. 75-C-3576 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 3, 1978), subsequent decision sub nom. Gutman v. Webster (N.D. Ill. Nov. 27, 1978).
1887	Summary judgment	Guzman v. Langer, No. 88-1526 (D.D.C. Apr. 24, 1989).
1888	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Guzman v. United States, No. 93-1949 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 1994).
1889	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), attorney work-
product privilege, deliberative process, exceptional circum
stances/due diligence, exhaustion of administrative remedies, no rec
ord within scope of request, sum
mary judgment	Guzzino v. FBI, No. 95-1780, 1997 WL 22886 (D. D.C. Jan. 10, 1997).
1890	(b)(5), commercial privilege	Hack v. DOE, 538 F. Supp. 1098 (D.D.C. 1982).
1891	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, fees	Hackett v. FBI, No. 84-3353 (D.D.C. Dec. 21, 1984).
1892	Res judicata	Hacopian v. Dep't of Labor, 709 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1983), dismissed, No. 81-2042 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 1985).
1893	Fees, pro se litigant	Hacopian v. HHS, No. 82-6663 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 1983).
1894	(b)(5), attorney-client privilege, exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, waiver of exemption	Haddam v. INS, No. 99-3371 (D.D.C. Feb. 15, 2001).
1895	Exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence	Haddon v. Freeh, No. 96-0138 (D.D.C. Aug. 29, 1996), summary judgment granted in part on other grounds, 31 F. Supp. 2d 16 (D.D.C. 1998).
1896	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, proper party defendant	Hahn v. Comm'r, No. 3-89-3254 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 1990), dismissed sub nom. Hahn v. IRS, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11594 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 1990).
1897	(b)(7)(C), duty to search, law en
forcement amendments (1986)	Hahn v. IRS, No. 90-2782 (D.D.C. Jan. 7, 1992).
1898	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confiden
tiality, law enforcement amend
ments (1986), summary judgment	Hale v. DOJ, No. 89-1175 (W.D. Okla. Jan. 31, 1991), aff'd, 973 F.2d 894 (10th Cir. 1992), cert. granted, vacated & remanded, 509 U.S. 918 (1993), remanded, 2 F.3d 1055 (10th Cir. 1993), on remand (W.D. Okla. Jan. 17, 1995), aff'd in part, rev'd & re
manded in part, 99 F.3d 1025 (10th Cir. 1996), sum
mary judgment granted (W.D. Okla. Aug. 20, 1998), aff'd, 226 F.3d 1200 (10th Cir. 2000).
1899	Duty to search	Hale Fire Pump Co. v. United States, No. 90-2714, 1990 WL 109948 (E.D. Pa. July 30, 1990).
1900	FOIA as a discovery tool	In re Halkin, 598 F.2d 176 (D.C. Cir. 1979).
1901	(b)(1), discretionary release, in camera inspection, leaks	Halkin v. Dep't of State, 598 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1978).
1902	(b)(1), E.O. 11652, E.O. 12065, (b)(2), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), adequacy of agency affidavit, in camera inspec
tion	Halkin v. FBI, 3 GDS ¶82,369 (N.D. Ill. 1980), re
consideration granted, 3 GDS ¶82,370 (N.D. Ill. 1980).
1903	(b)(1), E.O. 12958, (b)(2), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, displacement of FOIA, duty to search, law enforce
ment purpose	Hall v. DOJ, 26 F. Supp. 2d 78 (D.D.C. 1998), sum
mary judgment denied, 63 F. Supp. 2d 14 (D.D.C. 1999), on in camera inspection, No. 96-2306 (D. D.C. Sept. 10, 1999).
1904	Fees (Reform Act), summary judg
ment, Vaughn Index	Hall v. DOJ, No. 88-3071 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 1989).
1905	(b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), agency records, assur
ance of confidentiality, attorney work-product privilege, delibera
tive process, law enforcement amendments (1986), law en
forcement purpose, reasonably se
gregable, Vaughn Index	Hall v. DOJ, No. 87-0474, 1989 WL 24542 (D.D.C. Mar. 8, 1989) (magistrate's partial recommendation), summary judgment recommended (D.D.C. June 20, 1989) (magistrate's final recommendation), adopted (D.D.C. July 31, 1989).
1906	(a)(1)(D), publication	Hall v. Heckler, 602 F. Supp. 1169 (N.D. Cal. 1985).
1907	(b)(6), (b)(7)(C), attorney's fees, law enforcement amendments (1986), waiver of exemption	Halloran v. VA, No. 86-4050 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 1, 1988), rev'd, 874 F.2d 315 (5th Cir. 1989).
1908	(b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, adequacy of agency affida
vit, "mosaic," summary judgment	Halperin v. CIA, No. 77-1859 (D.D.C. July 25, 1979), aff'd, 629 F.2d 144 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
1909	(b)(1), E.O. 11652, (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3)	Halperin v. CIA, No. 76-1082 (D.D.C. Dec. 23, 1977), summary judgment granted, 446 F. Supp. 661 (D.D.C. 1978).
1910	(b)(1), E.O. 11652, "mosaic"	Halperin v. Colby, No. 75-0676 (D.D.C. June 4, 1976).
1911	(b)(1), E.O. 11652, belated classi
fication, equitable discretion, in camera inspection, waiver of ex
emption	Halperin v. Dep't of State, 565 F.2d 699 (D.C. Cir. 1977).
1912	(b)(1), E.O. 11652, in camera in
spection, reasonably segregable	Halperin v. NSC, No. 75-0675 (D.D.C. Jan. 19, 1976), summary judgment granted, 452 F. Supp. 47 (D.D.C. 1978), aff'd, No. 78-1858 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 14, 1980) (unpublished memorandum), 612 F.2d 586 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (table cite), reh'g denied, 2 GDS ¶82,165 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
1913	(b)(1), E.O. 12365, E.O. 12958, (b)(2), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403-
3(c)(6), (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), adequacy of request, assurance of confidentiality, in camera inspection, law enforce
ment purpose, Vaughn Index	Halpern v. FBI, No. 94-0036A (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 1997) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 1998), aff'd in part, rev'd in part & remanded, 181 F.3d 279 (2d Cir. 1999), summary judgment granted (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2001) (mag
istrate's recommendation), adopted (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2001).
1914	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, duty to search, in camera inspection	Halprin v. Webster, No. 78-1149 (D.D.C. May 18, 1979), reconsideration denied (D.D.C. June 29, 1979), summary judgment granted, 1 GDS ¶79,108 (D.D.C. 1979).
1915	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), pro se litigant, summary judgment	Ham v. Bell, No. 79-0082 (D.D.C. Aug. 30, 1979), rev'd & remanded sub nom. Ham v. Smith, 652 F.2d 628 (D.C. Cir. 1981), on remand, 2 GDS ¶82,025 (D.D.C. 1981).
1916	(b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), attorney work-product privilege, law enforcement purpose, sum
mary judgment	Hambarian v. Comm'r, No. 99-9000, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6317 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2000).
1917	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Hamilton v. DOJ, No. 79-0945 (W.D. La. July 9, 1980).
1918	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(b)(2), duty to search, summary judgment	Hamilton v. IRS, No. 86-4146 (D. Idaho Dec. 1, 1986), aff'd, No. 87-3520 (9th Cir. Dec. 23, 1987) (unpublished memorandum), 835 F.2d 1435 (9th Cir. 1987) (table cite), reh'g denied (9th Cir. Jan. 27, 1988).
1919	(b)(2), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confidentiality, attorney's fees	Hamilton v. Weise, No. 95-1161, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18900 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 1, 1997).
1920	(b)(5), deliberative process, ex
haustion of administrative reme
dies, jurisdiction, reasonably segre
gable, summary judgment	Hamilton Sec. Group v. HUD, 106 F. Supp. 2d 23 (D.D.C. 2000), summary affirmance granted, No. 00-
5331, 2001 WL 238162 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 23, 2001).
1921	(a)(2)(C)	Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097 (Fed. Cir. 1995).
1922	(a)(6)(A), (a)(6)(B), (b)(1), E.O. 12065, (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), attorney's fees, exceptional circumstances/ due diligence, proper party de
fendant, Vaughn Index	Hamlin v. Kelley, 433 F. Supp. 180 (N.D. Ill. 1977), modified on reconsideration, 2 GDS ¶81,378 (N.D. Ill. 1980).
1923	(b)(7)(E), summary judgment	Hammes v. United States Customs Serv., No. 94-
4868 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 2, 1994).
1924	Attorney's fees, exhaustion of ad
ministrative remedies, Vaughn In
dex	Hammie v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 765 F. Supp. 1224 (E.D. Pa. 1991), attorney's fees awarded, No. 90-
6955 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 1991).
1925	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Hampel v. Autoridad de Energia Electrica, 716 F. Supp. 52 (D.P.R. 1989).
1926	(b)(5), agency records, deliberative process, summary judgment	Hamrick v. Dep't of the Navy, No. 90-0283, 1992 WL 739887 (D.D.C. Aug. 28, 1992), appeal dismiss
ed, No. 92-5376 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 4, 1995).
1927	(b)(7)(D), discovery/FOIA inter
face, FOIA as a discovery tool	Han v. Food & Nutrition Serv. of the USDA, 580 F. Supp. 1564 (D.N.J. 1984).
1928	Venue	Handlery Hotels, Inc. v. Consumer Prod. Safety Comm'n, No. 97-1100 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 1997).
1929	(b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), injunction of agency proceeding pending resolution of FOIA claim	Hankamer Ready Mix Concrete Co. v. NLRB, 92 L.R.R.M. 2720 (D. Kan. 1976).
1930	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Hanlon v. Dep't of Commerce, No. 86-2906 (D.D.C. July 13, 1987), vacated (D.D.C. July 17, 1987).
1931	Res judicata, summary judgment	Hanner v. Stone, No. 92-1579, 1992 WL 361382 (6th Cir. Dec. 8, 1992) (unpublished order), 983 F.2d 1066 (6th Cir. 1992) (table cite).
1932	Res judicata	Hanner v. Stone, No. 92-72719 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 26, 1992), aff'd, No. 92-2565, 1993 WL 302206 (6th Cir. Aug. 6, 1993) (unpublished order), 1 F.3d 1240 (6th Cir. 1993) (table cite).
1933	Summary judgment	Hanner v. Stone, No. 91-71271 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 19, 1991), aff'd, No. 92-1157 (6th Cir. June 15, 1992) (unpublished memorandum), 966 F.2d 1452 (6th Cir. 1992) (table cite), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 941 (1992).
1934	(b)(1), (b)(5), deliberative process, Vaughn Index	Hansen v. Dep't of the Air Force, No. 91-0099 (D. D.C. Apr. 15, 1991), summary judgment denied, 817 F. Supp. 123 (D.D.C. 1992).
1935	(b)(7)(A)	Hanson v. IRS, 46 A.F.T.R. 2d 80-5999 (N.D. Tex. 1980).
1936	(b)(7)	Harbolt v. Alldredge, 464 F.2d 1243 (10th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1025 (1972).
1937	Agency records, proper party de
fendant	Harbolt v. Bensinger, No. 76-H-1737 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 1977).
1938	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), attorney's fees, fee waiver	Harbolt v. Canales, 3 GDS ¶83,028 (S.D. Tex. 1982).
1939	(b)(2), mootness	Harbolt v. Carlson, No. 77-0341 (N.D. Ga. June 15, 1978).
1940	(b)(6)	Harbolt v. Dep't of State, No. 77-1952 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 1979), aff'd, 616 F.2d 772 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 856 (1980).
1941	(a)(2)(C), (b)(2), equitable discre
tion, interaction of (a)(2) & (a)(3)	Hardy v. BATF, No. 78-189 (D. Ariz. Jan. 17, 1979), rev'd, 631 F.2d 653 (9th Cir. 1980).
1942	(b)(6), discovery in FOIA litiga
tion, duty to search	Hardy v. DOD, No. 99-523 (D. Ariz. Aug. 27, 2001), subsequent order (D. Ariz. Oct. 25, 2001).
1943	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(E), agency rec
ords, duty to search	Hardy v. FBI, No. 95-883 (D. Ariz. July 29, 1997).
1944	(a)(1)(D), (a)(1)(E), publication	Hark v. Dragon, 477 F. Supp. 308 (D. Vt. 1979), aff'd, 611 F.2d 11 (2d Cir. 1979).
1945	(b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D)	Harowe Servo Controls, Inc. v. NLRB, 92 L.R.R.M. 2572 (E.D. Pa. 1976).
1946	(b)(1), (b)(3), fee waiver (Reform Act), statute of limitations, Vaughn Index, waiver of exemption	Harper v. DOJ, No. 92-462 (D. Or. Aug. 9, 1993), aff'd in part, rev'd in part & remanded sub nom. Harper v. DOD, No. 93-35876, 1995 WL 392032 (9th Cir. July 3, 1995) (unpublished memorandum), 60 F.3d 833 (9th Cir. 1995) (table cite).
1947	(b)(2), (b)(3), 28 U.S.C. §534, Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), law enforcement purpose, summary judgment, Vaughn Index	Harper v. DOJ, No. 85-3714 (D.D.C. July 1, 1986), summary affirmance granted in part & remanded in part, No. 86-5489 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 22, 1987).
1948	(b)(2), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)	Harper v. Dep't of the Treasury, 2 GDS ¶82,054 (D. D.C. 1981).
1949	Agency, de novo review, fee waiv
er	Harper v. FBI, 3 GDS ¶83,048 (M.D. Pa. 1981), re
consideration denied, 3 GDS ¶83,049 (M.D. Pa. 1982).
1950	(b)(4), customary treatment	Harrison v. Lujan, Nos. 90-1512, 91-0250 (D.D.C. Dec. 8, 1992).
1951	Fee waiver (Reform Act)	Harrison v. United States Nat'l Archives, No. 93-
0448 (D.D.C. May 21, 1993).
1952	(b)(2), attorney's fees, mootness	Harrison Bros. Meat Packing Co. v. USDA, 640 F. Supp. 402 (M.D. Pa. 1986).
1953	(b)(5), (b)(6), deliberative process, reasonably segregable, summary judgment	Harry v. Dep't of the Army, No. 92-1654 (D.D.C. Sept. 10, 1993).
1954	Duty to search, jurisdiction	Hart v. FBI, No. 94-C-6010, 1995 WL 170001 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 6, 1995), aff'd, No. 95-2110, 1996 WL 403016 (7th Cir. July 16, 1996) (unpublished order), 91 F.3d 146 (7th Cir. 1996) (table cite).
1955	(b)(5), (b)(6), deliberative process	Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Dep't of the Navy, No. 88-45 (E.D. Va. June 24, 1988).
1956	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, injunction of agency pro
ceeding pending resolution of FOIA claim	Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. NLRB, 73 Lab. Cas. (CCH) ¶14,409 (D.D.C. 1974).
1957	(b)(7)(A), FOIA as a discovery tool, Vaughn Index	Hartman v. IRS, 41 A.F.T.R. 2d 78-305 (W.D. Pa. 1977).
1958	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidentiality, duty to search, summary judgment	Harvey v. DOJ, No. 96-0509, 1997 WL 669640 (D. D.C. Oct. 23, 1997).
1959	Privacy Act access, (b)(7)(C), duty to search, exhaustion of adminis
trative remedies	Harvey v. DOJ, No. 92-176 (D. Mont. Jan. 9, 1996), aff'd, No. 96-36021, 1997 WL 312563 (9th Cir. June 9, 1997) (unpublished memorandum), 116 F.3d 484 (9th Cir. 1997) (table cite).
1960	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), attorney work-product privilege, delibera
tive process, improper withhold
ing, law enforcement amendments (1986), mootness, summary judg
ment	Harvey v. DOJ, 747 F. Supp. 29 (D.D.C. 1990).
1961	(b)(7)(A), exhaustion of adminis
trative remedies, in camera inspec
tion	Harvey's Wagon Wheel, Inc. v. NLRB, 91 L.R.R.M. 2410 (N.D. Cal. 1976), aff'd in part, rev'd in part & remanded, 550 F.2d 1139 (9th Cir. 1976).
1962	Privacy Act access, (b)(5), exhaus
tion of administrative remedies	Hass v. United States Air Force, 848 F. Supp. 926 (D. Kan. 1994).
1963	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confiden
tiality, law enforcement amend
ments (1986), summary judgment, Vaughn Index	Hassan v. FBI, No. 91-2189 (D.D.C. May 13, 1992), summary judgment granted, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22655 (D.D.C. July 13, 1992).
1964	Privacy Act access, (b)(7)(C), summary judgment	Hatcher v. DOJ, 910 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1995).
1965	(b)(3), 39 U.S.C. §410(c)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), FOIA as a dis
covery tool, law enforcement pur
pose	Hatcher v. United States Postal Serv., 556 F. Supp. 331 (D.D.C. 1982).
1966	(b)(4), discretionary release	Hawaiian Int'l Shipping Corp. v. Dep't of Commerce, 3 GDS ¶82,366 (D.D.C. 1982).
1967	(b)(4)	Hawaiian Int'l Shipping Corp. v. Dep't of the Navy, 2 GDS ¶81,269 (D.D.C. 1981), subsequent decision, 2 GDS ¶81,273 (D.D.C. 1981).
1968	(b)(4), adequacy of agency affida
vit, summary judgment	Hawaiian W. Steel Ltd. v. United States Customs Serv., No. 84-0440 (D. Haw. Feb. 13, 1985).
1969	(a)(2)(C), (b)(2)	Hawkes v. IRS, 71-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) ¶9640 (W.D. Tenn. 1971), rev'd & remanded, 467 F.2d 787 (6th Cir. 1972), on remand, No. C70-409 (W.D. Tenn. Nov. 5, 1973), aff'd, 507 F.2d 481 (6th Cir. 1974).
1970	(b)(4), discovery in FOIA litigation	Hawthorn Mgmt. Servs. v. HUD, No. 3:96-2435, 1997 WL 821767 (D. Conn. Dec. 18, 1997).
1971	(b)(1), E.O. 11652, E.O. 12065, (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), adequacy of agency affidavit, adequacy of re
quest, attorney's fees, discovery in FOIA litigation, in camera in
spection, res judicata, Vaughn Index	Hayden v. CIA, No. 76-0284 (D.D.C. Sept. 29, 1976), partial summary judgment granted (D.D.C. Oct. 18, 1976), on in camera inspection (D.D.C. Dec. 3, 1976), summary judgment granted (D.D.C. Apr. 15, 1977), on in camera inspection (D.D.C. May 19, 1977), attorney's fees denied (D.D.C. Sept. 27, 1977), remanded, No. 77-1894 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 15, 1978), on remand, 1 GDS ¶80,065 (D.D.C. 1980), renewed motion for attorney's fees denied, 3 GDS ¶82,279 (D.D.C. 1982).
1972	(a)(4)(C), (a)(6)(A), (a)(6)(B)	Hayden v. DOJ, 413 F. Supp. 1285 (D.D.C. 1976).
1973	(b)(1), E.O. 11652, (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §402, in camera inspection, summary judgment, Vaughn Index	Hayden v. Nat'l Sec. Agency/Cent. Sec. Serv., 452 F. Supp. 247 (D.D.C. 1978), aff'd, 608 F.2d 1381 (D.C. Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 937 (1980).
1974	(b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), delib
erative process, exhaustion of ad
ministrative remedies	Hayes v. Dep't of Labor, No. 96-1149, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14120 (S.D. Ala. June 18, 1998) (mag
istrate's recommendation), adopted as modified (S.D. Ala. Aug. 10, 1998).
1975	Attorney's fees	Hayes Int'l, Inc. v. Dep't of the Navy, No. 86-T-1129 (M.D. Ala. Aug. 12, 1988).
1976	Pro se litigant	Hayles v. DOJ, No. 79-1599 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 1982), dismissed (S.D. Tex. Nov. 2, 1982).
1977	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(F)	Hayward v. DOJ, 2 GDS ¶82,230 (D.D.C. 1982).
1978	(b)(2), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E)	Hayward v. DOJ, 2 GDS ¶81,231 (D.D.C. 1981).
1979	(b)(7)(C), dismissal for failure to prosecute, summary judgment	Hazel v. DOJ, No. 99-2117 (D.D.C. Sept. 11, 2000).
1980	(b)(2), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), law enforcement pur
pose, reasonably segregable	Hazel v. DOJ, No. 95-1992 (D.D.C. July 2, 1998), subsequent opinion (D.D.C. Oct. 16, 1998).
1981	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), duty to search, proper party defendant	Headley v. FBI, No. 75-3200 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 1976).
1982	Agency	Health Sys. Med. Supply v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield, No. 77-P-0988 (N.D. Ala. Nov. 2, 1977).
1983	(b)(2), (b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality	Hearnes v. IRS, 44 A.F.T.R. 2d 79-5594 (E.D. Mo. 1979).
1984	(b)(6), (b)(7)(C), summary judg
ment	Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers, Local 16 v. Dep't of the Air Force, No. S92-2173 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 1993).
1985	Summary judgment	Hecht v. Dep't of the Interior, No. 71-345 (E.D. Va. Apr. 5, 1972).
1986	Duty to search, summary judgment	Heckman v. Executive Branch, United States Fed. Gov't, No. 86-132 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 1987), aff'd, 823 F.2d 544 (2d Cir. 1987).
1987	(b)(6), res judicata, summary judg
ment	Heckman v. Olive, No. 88-2981, 1992 WL 390249 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 1992).
1988	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Hedley v. United States, 594 F.2d 1043 (5th Cir. 1979).
1989	(b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(4), in camera inspection, Vaughn Index, waiver of exemption	Heeney v. FDA, No. 97-5461 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 1999), aff'd, 7 Fed. Appx. 770 (9th Cir. 2001).
1990	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, jurisdiction	Hefti v. IRS, No. 90-3223 (C.D. Ill. June 17, 1991) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted (C.D. Ill. June 28, 1991).
1991	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(7(C), attorney work-product privilege, deliberative process, summary judgment, waiver of ex
emption	Heggestad v. DOJ, 182 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2000).
1992	(b)(1), E.O. 11652, (b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), proper party defendant	Heifler v. FBI, No. 78-1670 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 1978).
1993	(b)(6), FOIA/PA interface	Heights Cmty. Cong. v. VA, 3 GDS ¶82,284 (N.D. Ohio 1982), aff'd, 732 F.2d 526 (6th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1034 (1984).
1994	Case or controversy	Heimerle v. Bureau of Prisons, No. 84-1973 (D.D.C. July 11, 1984).
1995	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidentiality, sum
mary judgment	Heimerle v. DOJ, No. 84-1406 (D.D.C. Jan. 30, 1985).
1996	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, attorney's fees, in camera inspection, mootness, waiver of exemption	Heimerle v. DOJ, No. 83-1994 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 26, 1984), partial summary judgment granted (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 1985), on motion for attorney's fees (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 1985).
1997	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, fees, fee waiver	Heimerle v. DOJ, 3 GDS ¶82,261 (D.D.C. 1982).
1998	No record within scope of request	Heimerle v. Fiske, No. 78-1388 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 1979).
1999	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), deliber
ative process	Heimerle v. United States Attorney Gen., 1 GDS ¶80,023 (D.D.C. 1980).
2000	Exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence	Heimerle v. United States Marshals Serv., No. 84-
1194 (D.D.C. Sept. 6, 1984).
2001	(b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confiden
tiality, deliberative process	Heimerle v. United States Secret Serv., No. 78-2015 (D.D.C. July 6, 1979).
2002	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(e)(7), (b)(7)(D), displacement of FOIA	Heinsohn v. IRS, 553 F. Supp. 791 (E.D. Tenn. 1982).
2003	(b)(3), 5 U.S.C. §552a(j)(2), §552a(k)(2), FOIA/PA interface	Heinzl v. INS, 3 GDS ¶83,121 (N.D. Cal. 1981).
2004	(b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), attorney work-product privilege, deliberative process, waiver of ex
emption	Heller v. United States Marshals Serv., 655 F. Supp. 1088 (D.D.C. 1987).
2005	Duty to search	Helmon v. DOJ, No. 1:00-141 (W.D. Ky. July 28, 2001).
2006	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, Vaughn Index	Helmon v. IRS, No. 3-00-0809, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17628 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2000) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted (W.D. Tex. Nov. 30, 2000).
2007	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), attorney work-product privilege, deliberative process, summary judgment, Vaughn Index	Helmsley v. DOJ, No. 90-2413 (D.D.C. Sept. 24, 1992).
2008	(b)(6), adequacy of request	Hemenway v. Hughes, 601 F. Supp. 1002 (D.D.C. 1985).
2009	No record within scope of request	Henderson v. IRS, No. 93-1699 (S.D. Ind. May 31, 1994).
2010	Attorney's fees	Hendricks v. DOJ, No. 92-5621, 1993 WL 294767 (E.D. Pa. July 29, 1993).
2011	(b)(5), attorney work-product priv
ilege, deliberate process, inter- or intra-agency memoranda	Hennessey v. Agency for Int'l Dev., No. 3:95-479 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 1996), rev'd, No. 97-1133, 1997 WL 537998 (4th Cir. Sept. 2, 1997) (per curiam) (un
published memorandum), 121 F.3d 698 (4th Cir. 1997) (table cite).
2012	Agency, proper party defendant, Vaughn Index	Henry v. FBI, No. 90-1987 (W.D. La. Oct. 7, 1991).
2013	Attorney's fees	Henry v. Office of Educ. of HEW, 2 GDS ¶81,085 (D. Colo. 1980).
2014	Res judicata	Hensley v. DOJ, 3 GDS ¶82,343 (S.D. Ohio 1981).
2015	(b)(2), (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §2510, (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)	Hensley v. DEA, 3 GDS ¶82,342 (S.D. Ohio 1980) (magistrate's recommendation adopted).
2016	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(4), adequacy of agency affidavit, agency records, de novo review, mootness	Hercules, Inc. v. Marsh, 659 F. Supp. 849 (W.D. Va. 1987), aff'd, 839 F.2d 1027 (4th Cir. 1988).
2017	(b)(6)	Herman v. Middendorf, No. 75-1246 (D.D.C. Dec. 16, 1975).
2018	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), pro se litigant, Vaughn Index	Hernandez v. FBI, No. 77-2099 (D.D.C. June 1, 1978).
2019	(b)(4), summary judgment, waiver of exemption	Herrick v. Garvey, No. 99-0234, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20342 (D. Wyo. Dec. 12, 2000).
2020	(a)(1)(D), (a)(2)(C), publication	Herron v. Heckler, 576 F. Supp. 218 (N.D. Cal. 1983).
2021	(b)(5), (b)(7)(A), in camera inspec
tion	Heublein v. FTC, 457 F. Supp. 52 (D.D.C. 1978).
2022	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(e)(7), (b)(5), (b)(7)(A), no record within scope of request, summary judg
ment	Heun v. IRS, No. 89-1243 (D. Ariz. Nov. 14, 1990).
2023	Privacy Act access, (b)(6)	HHS v. FLRA, No. 92-1012, 1992 WL 390891 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 10, 1992).
2024	(b)(2)	Hicks v. Freeman, 397 F.2d 193 (4th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1064 (1969).
2025	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Hicks v. Hanberry, No. C78-1044 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 22, 1978).
2026	Privacy Act access, (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(F), duty to search, law enforcement purpose, reasonably segregable, summary judgment	Hidalgo v. Bureau of Prisons, No. 00-1229 (D.D.C. June 6, 2001).
2027	Privacy Act access, (b)(1), E.O. 11652, (b)(2), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, (b)(6), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), duty to search, FOIA/PA interface, in camera inspection, reasonably segregable	Higgs v. CIA, No. 76-0884 (D.D.C. Jan. 13, 1977), subsequent decision (D.D.C. Mar. 7, 1977).
2028	(b)(7)(C), attorney's fees, duty to search	Hightower v. FBI, No. 98-2817 (D.D.C. Mar. 20, 2000).
2029	(b)(3), 5 U.S.C. §552a(f)(3), prop
er party defendant	Hill v. Blevins, No. 92-0859 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 1993), aff'd, 19 F.3d 643 (3d Cir. 1994).
2030	(b)(6), summary judgment	Hill v. USDA, 77 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D.D.C. 1999), sum
mary affirmance granted, No. 99-5365, 2000 WL 520724 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 7, 2000).
2031	(a)(6)(A), exceptional circum
stances/due diligence, exhaustion of administrative remedies, failure to meet time limits, fees, fee waiv
er	Hill v. Dep't of the Air Force, No. 85-1485 (D.N.M. Sept. 4, 1987), aff'd on other grounds, 844 F.2d 1407 (10th Cir. 1988), dismissed on other grounds (D. N.M. Jan. 8, 1993).
2032	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), agency	Hill v. N.J. State Lottery Comm'n, No. 91-0486 (D. N.J. Aug. 27, 1991).
2033	(b)(6), adequacy of agency affida
vit, attorney's fees, mootness, no record within scope of request, proper party defendant	Hill v. Sec'y of the Air Force, No. 83-0804 (D.N.M. Feb. 2, 1984), attorney's fees awarded (D.N.M. June 4, 1984).
2034	Duty to search, summary judgment	Hill v. United States, No. 5-82-84 (D. Minn. July 14, 1983).
2035	Attorney's fees, burden of proof, duty to search, improper withhold
ing, interaction of (a)(2) & (a)(3), mootness, personal records, trans
fer of FOIA case	Hill v. United States Air Force, No. 84-1952 (D. D.C. Feb. 11, 1985), subsequent decision (D.D.C. May 24, 1985), summary judgment granted (D.D.C. June 26, 1985), reconsideration denied (D.D.C. May 16, 1986), aff'd, 795 F.2d 1067 (D.C. Cir. 1986).
2036	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(7)(A), adequacy of agency af
fidavit, proper party defendant, summary judgment, Vaughn Index	Hillcrest Equities, Inc. v. DOJ, No. 3-85-2351 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 26, 1987).
2037	Fee waiver, jurisdiction	Hilliard v. Northeast Region Agency Bureau of Pris
ons, No. 85-2818 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 1985).
2038	Discovery in FOIA litigation, no record within scope of request, summary judgment	Hillman v. Comm'r, No. 1:97-760, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12431 (W.D. Mich. July 10, 1998).
2039	(b)(5), attorney's fees, attorney work-product privilege, summary judgment	Hill Tower, Inc. v. Dep't of the Navy, 718 F. Supp. 562 (N.D. Tex. 1988), attorney's fees denied, 718 F. Supp. 568 (N.D. Tex. 1989).
2040	No improper withholding	Hindman v. FBI, No. 90-5047 (6th Cir. Oct. 4, 1990) (unpublished order), 915 F.2d 1571 (6th Cir. 1990) (table cite).
2041	(b)(1), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), exceptional circum
stances/due diligence, Vaughn Index	Hinton v. FBI, 527 F. Supp. 223 (E.D. Pa. 1981), Vaughn Index ordered, No. 81-0740 (E.D. Pa. May 7, 1987), appeal dismissed sub nom. Hinton v. DOJ, 844 F.2d 126 (3d Cir. 1988), additional Vaughn In
dex ordered (E.D. Pa. Oct. 30, 1989).
2042	Attorney's fees	Hiranport Co. v. Dep't of the Treasury, No. 79-4558 (9th Cir. Oct. 16, 1980) (unpublished memorandum), 633 F.2d 222 (9th Cir. 1980) (table cite).
2043	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e)	Hiss v. DOJ, 441 F. Supp. 69 (S.D.N.Y. 1977).
2044	(a)(1)(C), publication	Historic Green Springs, Inc. v. Bergland, 497 F. Supp. 839 (E.D. Va. 1980).
2045	(b)(4), FOIA as a discovery tool	HLI Lordship Indus. v. Comm. for Purchase from the Blind & Other Severely Handicapped, 663 F. Supp. 246 (E.D. Va. 1987).
2046	(b)(6)	HMG Mktg. Assocs. v. Freeman, 523 F. Supp. 11 (S.D.N.Y. 1980).
2047	(b)(7)(C), duty to search	Ho v. Dir., Executive Office for United States Attor
neys, No. 00-1759 (D.D.C. Sept. 17, 2001).
2048	(a)(2)(C), (b)(2), (b)(3), 42 U.S.C. §2000e-8(e), (b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(E), deliberative process, FOIA as a discovery tool, interaction of (a)(2) & (a)(3)	Hobart Corp. v. EEOC, 603 F. Supp. 1431 (S.D. Ohio 1984), vacated, No. C3-80-326 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 22, 1985).
2049	(b)(1), E.O. 12065, E.O. 12356, (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(F), adequacy of agency affidavit, deliberative process, in camera inspection, mootness, reasonably segregable, waiver of exemption	Hoch v. CIA, 593 F. Supp. 675 (D.D.C. 1984), sub
sequent order, No. 82-0754, 1988 WL 212536 (D. D.C. Sept. 30, 1988), aff'd, No. 88-5422 (D.C. Cir. July 20, 1990) (unpublished memorandum), 907 F.2d 1227 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (table cite).
2050	(a)(2)	Hodge v. Alexander, No. 77-0288 (D.D.C. May 13, 1977).
2051	Proper service of process	Hodge v. Rostker, 501 F. Supp. 332 (D.D.C. 1980).
2052	(b)(5), (b)(7), discovery/FOIA in
terface	Hodgson v. Carl Roessler, Inc., 70 Lab. Cas. (CCH) ¶32,849 (D. Conn. 1973).
2053	FOIA as a discovery tool	Hodgson v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 54 F.R.D. 445 (S.D. Fla. 1972).
2054	Privacy Act access, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §2511, (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), law enforcement purpose	Hoffman v. Brown, No. 1:96-53 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 26, 1996), aff'd, No. 97-1145, 1998 WL 297575 (4th Cir. May 19, 1998) (unpublished memorandum), 145 F.3d 1324 (4th Cir. 1998) (table cite).
2055	(b)(7)(A), adequacy of agency affi
davit, duty to search, in camera in
spection, no improper withholding, Vaughn Index	Hoffman v. FBI, No. 98-1733 (W.D. Okla. Apr. 16, 1999), Vaughn Index denied sub nom. Hoffman v. DOJ (W.D. Okla. Oct. 18, 1999), summary judgment denied (W.D. Okla. Dec. 15, 1999), judgment deferred (W.D. Okla. June 21, 2000), renewed mo
tion for summary judgment denied (W.D. Okla. Sept. 20, 2000), in camera inspection ordered (W.D. Okla. June 14, 2001), summary judgment deferred (W.D. Okla. July 10, 2001), summary judgment granted (W.D. Okla. Sept. 21, 2001).
2056	Proper party defendant	Hoffman v. United States Postal Serv., No. 93-C-
6718 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 6, 1994).
2057	(b)(1), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), (b)(6), in camera in
spection	Hofmann v. CIA, 2 GDS ¶81,339 (D.D.C. 1981).
2058	(b)(2), (b)(5), attorney work-prod
uct privilege, exhaustion of admin
istrative remedies	Hogan v. United States, No. 73-1385 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 1974).
2059	Attorney's fees, proper party de
fendant	Hogg v. Chandler, No. 3-84-2062 (N.D. Tex. May 16, 1985) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted in part (N.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 1985).
2060	Publication	Hogg v. United States, 428 F.2d 274 (6th Cir. 1970).
2061	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(e)(7), (b)(7)(A)	Holbrook v. IRS, 914 F. Supp. 314 (S.D. Iowa 1996).
2062	(b)(2), (b)(6), (b)(7)C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, duty to search, exhaustion of administrative remedies	Holguin v. Dep't of the Treasury, No. 99-1244 (D. D.C. Mar. 30, 2001).
2063	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(4)	Holiday Inns, Inc. v. Kleppe, 40 Ad. L. 2d (P & F) 66 (W.D. Tenn. 1976).
2064	(b)(7)	Holiday Magic, Inc. v. FTC, 32 Ad. L. 2d (P & F) 703 (D.D.C. 1973).
2065	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, (b)(6), adequacy of agency affidavit, rea
sonably segregable	Holland v. CIA, No. 91-1233, 1992 WL 233820 (D. D.C. Aug. 31, 1992).
2066	(b)(2), (b)(3), 28 U.S.C. §534, Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confidentiality, in camera affidavit, Vaughn Index	Holland v. DOJ, No. 85-1140 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 4, 1985), summary judgment granted (E.D. Pa. Mar. 11, 1986).
2067	Adequacy of agency affidavit	Holland v. Harris, No. 83-2207 (D.D.C. Feb. 6, 1984), aff'd, No. 84-5193 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 17, 1984).
2068	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Holland v. Webster, No. 83-2308 (D.D.C. Oct. 30, 1983).
2069	(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D)	Hollander v. Kelley, No. 77-204 (D.N.M. Aug. 11, 1978).
2070	(b)(5), attorney-client privilege, at
torney work-product privilege, de
liberative process, in camera in
spection, summary judgment	Hollar v. IRS, No. 95-1882, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12846 (D.D.C. Aug. 7, 1997).
2071	Privacy Act access, (b)(6), FOIA/ PA interface, summary judgment	Hollis v. Dep't of the Army, No. 85-3218 (D.D.C. July 2, 1986), aff'd, 856 F.2d 1541 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
2072	(b)(6), (b)(7)(C), attorney's fees, disciplinary proceedings, pro se litigant	Holly v. Acree, No. 75-2116 (D.D.C. Mar. 30, 1976), on motion for attorney's fees, 72 F.R.D. 115 (D.D.C. 1976), aff'd sub nom. Holly v. Chasen, 569 F.2d 160 (D.C. Cir. 1977), on motion for attorney's fees (D.D.C. Feb. 2, 1979), rev'd, 639 F.2d 795 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
2073	Jurisdiction	Holmes v. CIA, No. 84-0146 (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 26, 1985).
2074	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103	Holmes v. IRS, 1 GDS ¶80,196 (S.D. Cal. 1980).
2075	(b)(5), pro se litigant, stay pending appeal	Holt v. DOJ, No. 86-0232 (D.D.C. Apr. 30, 1986), dismissed (D.D.C. Sept. 23, 1986).
2076	(b)(1), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403, adequacy of agency affidavit, attor
ney's fees, belated classification, Congressional records, in camera affidavit, in camera inspection, re
ferral of request to another agency	Holy Spirit Ass'n v. CIA, No. 79-0151 (D.D.C. July 27, 1979), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 636 F.2d 838 (D.C. Cir. 1980), cert. granted, vacated in part & remanded, 455 U.S. 997 (1982), remanded, 3 GDS ¶83,144 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (unpublished memoran
dum), 684 F.2d 1032 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (table cite), on motion for summary judgment, 558 F. Supp. 41 (D.D.C. 1983), attorney's fees awarded (D.D.C. Mar. 5, 1984).
2077	(b)(1), E.O. 12065, (b)(3), 8 U.S.C. §1202(f), 50 U.S.C. §403g, (b)(6), adequacy of agency affida
vit, in camera inspection	Holy Spirit Ass'n v. Dep't of State, 526 F. Supp. 1022 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).
2078	(b)(1), E.O. 12065, (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), adequacy of agency affidavit, duty to search, law enforcement purpose	Holy Spirit Ass'n v. FBI, 2 GDS ¶82,235 (D.D.C. 1981), subsequent decision, 2 GDS ¶82,236 (D. D.C. 1981), on motion for reconsideration, 2 GDS ¶82,237 (D.D.C. 1981), aff'd, 683 F.2d 562 (D.C. Cir. 1982).
2079	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 15 U.S.C. §2055(b)(1)	Honeywell, Inc. v. Consumer Prod. Safety Comm'n, 582 F. Supp. 1072 (D.D.C. 1984), summary judg
ment granted, No. 83-3922 (D.D.C. Apr. 1, 1985).
2080	Reverse FOIA	Honeywell Info. Sys. v. Andrus, No. 77-2018 (D. D.C. Feb. 9, 1978).
2081	Reverse FOIA, (b)(4), discretion
ary release	Honeywell Info. Sys. v. NASA, Nos. 76-353, 76-377 (D.D.C. July 28, 1976).
2082	Mootness	Hook v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 96-5100, 1996 WL 549781 (6th Cir. Sept. 25, 1996) (unpublished order), 97 F.3d 1451 (6th Cir. 1996) (table cite).
2083	(b)(5), (b)(7)(A)	Hook Drugs v. NLRB, 91 L.R.R.M. 2797 (S.D. Ind. 1976).
2084	(b)(5), attorney work-product priv
ilege, deliberative process, reason
ably segregable, summary judg
ment	Hooper v. Bowen, No. 88-01030 (C.D. Cal. May 24, 1989).
2085	(b)(5), FOIA as a discovery tool	Hoover v. Dep't of the Interior, 611 F.2d 1132 (5th Cir. 1980).
2086	(b)(6), attorney's fees, waiver of exemption	Hopkins v. Dep't of the Navy, No. 84-1868, 1985 WL 17673 (D.D.C. Feb. 5, 1985), attorney's fees de
nied (D.D.C. July 10, 1985), appeal dismissed, No. 85-5356 (D.C. Cir. July 11, 1985).
2087	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), deliber
ative process, reasonably segrega
ble, summary judgment	Hopkins v. HUD, No. 90-489 (W.D.N.Y. July 31, 1990), aff'd in part & vacated & remanded in part, 929 F.2d 81 (2d Cir. 1991).
2088	(b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confiden
tiality, in camera affidavit, law en
forcement amendments (1986), law enforcement purpose	Hopkinson v. DOJ, No. C85-0483 (D. Wyo. July 23, 1986), aff'd sub nom. Hopkinson v. Shillinger, 866 F.2d 1185 (10th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 (1990).
2089	Judicial records	Hornbaker v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. 81-
1017 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 21, 1982) (magistrate's recom
mendation adopted).
2090	Privacy Act access, (b)(5), (b)(6), deliberative process	Horowitz v. Peace Corps, No. 00-0848 (D.D.C. Oct. 12, 2001).
2091	(b)(5), (b)(6), attorney's fees, de
liberative process, duty to search, waiver of exemption	Horsehead Indus. v. EPA, No. 94-1299 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 1996), summary judgment denied (D.D.C. Jan. 3, 1997), partial reconsideration granted (D. D.C. Mar. 13, 1997), attorney's fees denied, 999 F. Supp. 59 (D.D.C. 1998).
2092	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(e), (b)(7)(A), displacement of FOIA	Hosner v. IRS, 3 GDS ¶83,164 (D.D.C. 1983), relief from summary judgment denied, No. 82-2441 (D. D.C. Nov. 8, 1983).
2093	Fee waiver (Reform Act)	Hosp. & Physician Publ'g, Inc. v. DOD, No. 98-4117 (S.D. Ill. June 22, 1999),
2094	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, nexus test	Hosp. Affiliates Int'l, Inc. v. Califano, 1 GDS ¶79, 152 (N.D. Ill. 1979).
2095	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(4)	Hosp. Affiliates Int'l, Inc. v. Califano, No. 78-226 (M.D. Fla. May 8, 1978).
2096	Vaughn Index	Hosp. Corp. v. DOJ, No. 83-1575 (D.D.C. July 13, 1983).
2097	(b)(6), summary judgment	Hougan & Denton v. Dep't of Labor, No. 90-1312 (D.D.C. July 3, 1991).
2098	Transfer of FOIA case	Housley v. DOJ, Nos. 89-0436, 89-2166, 88-2167 (D.D.C. Nov. 13, 1989).
2099	(b)(3), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), summary judgment	Housley v. DOJ, Nos. 88-2112, 88-2113, 88-2116 (D.D.C. Jan. 11, 1989).
2100	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Housley v. Dep't of the Treasury, No. 88-2110 (D. D.C. Jan. 11, 1989).
2101	(b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidenti
ality, deliberative process, law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforcement purpose, waiver of exemption	Housley v. Dep't of the Treasury, 688 F. Supp. 37 (D.D.C. 1988).
2102	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforce
ment purpose, summary judgment	Housley v. Dep't of the Treasury, 697 F. Supp. 3 (D. D.C. 1988).
2103	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), Vaughn Index	Housley v. DEA, No. 89-822 (D. Nev. Mar. 16, 1992), aff'd, No. 92-16946, 1994 WL 168278 (9th Cir. May 4, 1994) (unpublished memorandum), 24 F.3d 246 (9th Cir. 1994) (table cite).
2104	(b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidentiality, attor
ney work-product privilege, law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforcement purpose, sum
mary judgment	Housley v. FBI, Nos. 87-2579, 87-3231, 1988 WL 30751 (D.D.C. Mar. 18, 1988), reconsideration de
nied (D.D.C. Nov. 8, 1988).
2105	Privacy Act access, attorney's fees, exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence, expedited processing, prop
er party defendant	Houston v. Prado, No. 84-401 (W.D. Tex. June 4, 1984) (magistrate's recommendation), summary judgment recommended sub nom. Houston v. DOJ (W.D. Tex. Aug. 14, 1985) (magistrate's recommen
dation).
2106	(a)(2)(B), adequacy of request, agency records, interaction of (a)(2) & (a)(3), proper party de
fendant	Howard v. Sec'y of the Air Force, No. 89-1008 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 1991).
2107	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)	Howard Johnson Co. v. NLRB, 444 F. Supp. 843 (E.D. Mich. 1977), rev'd, 618 F.2d 1 (6th Cir. 1980).
2108	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), injunction of agency proceeding pending resolu
tion of FOIA claim, law enforce
ment purpose	Howard Johnson Rest., Inc. v. NLRB, 95 L.R.R.M. 2471 (W.D.N.Y. 1977), summary judgment granted, No. 77-0124 (W.D.N.Y. June 9, 1977).
2109	(b)(5), deliberative process	Howdyshell v. Dep't of the Navy, 3 GDS ¶82,341 (S.D. Ohio 1981).
2110	(b)(6)	Hoyos v. VA, No. 98-4178 (11th Cir. Feb. 1, 1999) (per curiam) (unpublished order), 172 F.3d 882 (11th Cir. 1999) (table cite), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1047 (1999).
2111	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), adequacy of agency affidavit, attor
ney-client privilege, deliberative process, duty to search, reasonably segregable, referral of request to another agency, waiver of exemp
tion	Hronek v. DEA, 16 F. Supp. 2d 1260 (D. Or. 1998), aff'd, 7 Fed. Appx. 591 (9th Cir. 2001).
2112	(b)(1), E.O. 12065, (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, (b)(6), adequacy of agency affidavit, in camera inspection	Hrones v. CIA, 2 GDS ¶82,133 (D. Mass. 1980), summary judgment granted, 3 GDS ¶82,456 (D. Mass. 1981), aff'd, 685 F.2d 13 (1st Cir. 1982).
2113	No record within scope of request	Hrynko v. Crawford, 402 F. Supp. 1083 (E.D. Pa. 1975).
2114	(b)(7)(A), attorney's fees	Hubbell Mech. Supply Co. v. FBI, No. 85-3258 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 27, 1986), attorney's fees awarded (W.D. Mo. Apr. 15, 1986).
2115	(b)(5), deliberative process	Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. v. GSA, No. 77-1709 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 1978).
2116	(a)(6)(A), adequacy of request, duty to create a record, exhaustion of administrative remedies	Hudgins v. IRS, 620 F. Supp. 19 (D.D.C. 1985), aff'd, No. 85-5992 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 8, 1987) (unpub
lished memorandum), 808 F.2d 137 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (table cite).
2117	(a)(1)(C)	Hudgins v. IRS, No. 84-2693 (D.D.C. Jan. 15, 1985).
2118	Summary judgment	Hudgins v. IRS, No. 84-1712 (D.D.C. Sept. 10, 1984).
2119	(b)(6)	Hudson v. Dep't of the Army, No. 86-1114, 1987 WL 46755 (D.D.C. Jan. 29, 1987), aff'd, No. 87-
5050 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 26, 1991) (unpublished order), 926 F.2d 1215 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (table cite).
2120	(a)(1)(D), publication	Hudson v. United States, 766 F.2d 1288 (9th Cir. 1985).
2121	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, waiver of ex
emption	Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. v. Dep't of the Navy, 659 F. Supp. 674 (E.D.N.Y. 1987), aff'd, 891 F.2d 414 (2d Cir. 1989).
2122	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(e)(7), de novo review, displacement of FOIA, in camera inspection, sum
mary judgment	Huene v. IRS, 3 GDS ¶83,237 (E.D. Cal. 1983) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted sub nom. Huene v. United States, 3 GDS ¶83,238 (E.D. Cal. 1983), rev'd & remanded, No. 83-2183 (9th Cir. Dec. 13, 1984) (unpublished memorandum), 753 F.2d 1081 (9th Cir. 1984) (table cite).
2123	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, burden of proof, in camera inspection	Huff v. IRS, 46 A.F.T.R. 2d 80-5842, 2 GDS ¶81, 051 (D. Alaska 1980).
2124	(b)(6)	Hughes v. Bowen, No. 87-6105 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 22, 1987).
2125	(a)(1)	Hughes v. United States, 953 F.2d 531 (9th Cir. 1992).
2126	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, 42 U.S.C. §2000e, (b)(4)	Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Schlesinger, 384 F. Supp. 292 (C.D. Cal. 1974).
2127	Attorney's fees	Hull v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, No. C77-577 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 8, 1978).
2128	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, (b)(7)(A), displacement of FOIA	Hulsey v. IRS, 497 F. Supp. 617 (N.D. Tex. 1980).
2129	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(4)	Humana of Va., Inc. v. Blue Cross, 455 F. Supp. 1174 (E.D. Va. 1978), rev'd & remanded, 622 F.2d 76 (4th Cir. 1980).
2130	(a)(1)	Human Res. Mgmt., Inc. v. Weaver, 442 F. Supp. 241 (D.D.C. 1978).
2131	Attorney's fees, exhaustion of ad
ministrative remedies, fee waiver, pro se litigant	Humphrey v. DOJ, 3 GDS ¶82,285 (W.D. Okla. 1981).
2132	Privacy Act access, (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403g, (b)(6), duty to search, FOIA/PA interface, sum
mary judgment	Hunsberger v. CIA, No. 92-2186 (D.D.C. Apr. 5, 1995), motion to amend denied (D.D.C. June 9, 1995).
2133	Dismissal for failure to prosecute	Hunsberger v. CIA, No. 89-0539 (D.D.C. May 30, 1990).
2134	Duty to search, preliminary injunc
tion	Hunsberger v. DOD, No. 93-0387 (D.D.C. July 27, 1994), dismissed (D.D.C. Mar. 20, 1996).
2135	Adequacy of request	Hunsberger v. DOE, No. 96-0455 (D.D.C. Mar. 14, 1996).
2136	Res judicata	Hunsberger v. DOJ, No. 94-0168, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6060 (D.D.C. May 3, 1994), summary af
firmance granted, No. 94-5234 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 10, 1995).
2137	Res judicata	Hunsberger v. DOJ, No. 93-1945 (D.D.C. Mar. 16, 1994).
2138	(b)(1), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, duty to search, exceptional circum
stances/due diligence, expedited processing, FOIA/PA interface, in camera inspection, law enforce
ment amendments (1986), law enforcement purpose, summary judgment	Hunsberger v. DOJ, No. 92-2587 (D.D.C. Oct. 29, 1993), further order (D.D.C. June 7, 1994), in cam
era inspection denied (D.D.C. Apr. 11, 1996), sum
mary judgment granted (D.D.C. July 22, 1997).
2139	Exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence	Hunsberger v. Dep't of State, No. 95-1734 (D.D.C. Mar. 15, 1996).
2140	Summary judgment	Hunsberger v. Dep't of State, No. 92-0092 (D.D.C. Dec. 10, 1992).
2141	Duty to search	Hunsberger v. FBI, No. 96-1841, 1997 WL 162989 (1st Cir. Mar. 14, 1997) (per curiam) (unpublished memorandum), 111 F.3d 122 (1st Cir. 1997) (table cite).
2142	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), "Glomar" de
nial, Vaughn Index, waiver of ex
emption	Hunt v. CIA, No. C92-1388 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 10, 1992), rev'd, 981 F.2d 1116 (9th Cir. 1992).
2143	(b)(1), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, (b)(6), attor
ney's fees	Hunt v. CIA, No. 78-146 (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 1978).
2144	(b)(3), 7 U.S.C. §12, (b)(5), (b)(7)(A)	Hunt v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 484 F. Supp. 47 (D.D.C. 1979).
2145	(b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), deliberative process	Hunt v. Dep't of State, 2 GDS ¶81,060 (D.D.C. 1981).
2146	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, reasonably segregable, summary judgment, waiver of exemption	Hunt v. FBI, No. C92-1390 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 1992).
2147	(b)(6), (b)(7)(C), law enforcement amendments (1986), waiver of ex
emption	Hunt v. FBI, No. 90-025 (D. Ariz. Jan. 10, 1991), rev'd & remanded, 972 F.2d 286 (9th Cir. 1992).
2148	(b)(3), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), exceptional circumstances/due diligence, in camera inspection	Hunter v. Christopher, 923 F. Supp. 5 (D.D.C. 1996).
2149	(b)(5), (b)(6), attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product privilege, deliberative process, duty to search, expedited proc
essing, preliminary injunction, summary judgment	Hunt v. United States Marine Corps, No. 94-2317 (D.D.C. Oct. 28, 1994), summary judgment granted, 935 F. Supp. 46 (D.D.C. 1996).
2150	Discovery in FOIA litigation, Fed. R.Civ.P. 34	Hurt v. United States, No. 72-3183 (9th Cir. Sept. 11, 1974).
2151	(b)(6)	Husek v. IRS, No. 90-0923, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20971 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 1991), aff'd, No. 91-6231 (2d Cir. Jan. 28, 1992) (unpublished order), 956 F.2d 1161 (2d Cir. 1992) (table cite).
2152	(b)(4)	Hustead v. Norwood, 529 F. Supp. 323 (S.D. Fla. 1981).
2153	Agency, jurisdiction	Hutchins v. Mid-Atl. Arts Found., No. 93-2371 (D. Md. Dec. 6, 1993), aff'd as modified sub nom. Hut
chins v. Nat'l Endowment for the Arts, No. 94-1146 (4th Cir. Oct. 19, 1994) (per curiam) (unpublished memorandum), 37 F.3d 1494 (4th Cir. 1994) (table cite).
2154	(b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E)	Hyde Park Prods. Corp. v. Acree, No. 75-2713 (S.D. N.Y. Nov. 18, 1975).
2155	Attorney's fees, summary judgment	Hydron Labs., Inc. v. EPA, 560 F. Supp. 718 (D.R.I. 1983).
2156	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Hymen v. MSPB, 799 F.2d 1421 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 (1987).
2157	Duty to search	Iacoe v. IRS, No. 98-0466, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12809 (E.D. Wis. July 23, 1999).
2158	(b)(5), deliberative process, incor
poration by reference	Ianniello v. OMB, No. 95-916 (D. Md. Jan. 19, 1996).
2159	(b)(6), FOIA/PA interface	Idaho v. United States Forest Serv., No. 97-0230-S (D. Idaho Dec. 9, 1997).
2160	(b)(5), attorney work-product priv
ilege, deliberative process, fee waiver, FOIA as a discovery tool	Idaho Wildlife Fed'n v. United States Forest Serv., 3 GDS ¶83,271 (D.D.C. 1983).
2161	(b)(1), (b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), Fed.R.Crim. P. 6(e), (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), attorney work-product privilege, Congressional records, in camera inspection, reasonably segregable	Iglesias v. CIA, 525 F. Supp. 547 (D.D.C. 1981), supplemental order, No. 80-2276 (D.D.C. Feb. 18, 1982).
2162	(b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confiden
tiality, deliberative process, duty to search, law enforcement purpose, "mosaic," reasonably segregable, referral of request to another agency	Iglesias v. FBI, No. 79-350-6 (W.D. Mich. July 3, 1985), subsequent opinion (W.D. Mich. Nov. 18, 1985).
2163	Agency, agency records, attorney's fees, de novo review, improper withholding, waiver of exemption	Ill. Inst. for Continuing Legal Educ. v. Dep't of Labor, 3 GDS ¶83,029 (N.D. Ill. 1982), summary judgment granted, 545 F. Supp. 1229 (N.D. Ill. 1982), attorney's fees denied, No. 81-C-1629 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 28, 1983).
2164	(b)(5), attorney work-product priv
ilege, deliberative process, in cam
era inspection, mootness	Ill. State Bd. of Educ. v. Bell, No. 84-0337 (D.D.C. Mar. 25, 1985), summary judgment granted (D.D.C. May 31, 1985).
2165	Adequacy of request	Immanuel v. Sec'y of Treasury, No. 94-884, 1995 WL 464141 (D. Md. Apr. 4, 1995), aff'd, No. 95-
1953, 1996 WL 157732 (4th Cir. Apr. 5, 1996) (per curiam) (unpublished memorandum), 81 F.3d 150 (4th Cir. 1996) (table cite).
2166	(b)(4), (b)(6), (b)(7)(A), duty to search, voluntary submissions	In Def. of Animals v. HHS, No. 99-3024 (D.D.C. Sept. 28, 2001).
2167	Agency	Indep. Investor Protective League v. N.Y. Stock Exchange, 367 F. Supp. 1376 (S.D.N.Y. 1973).
2168	(b)(4)	India Abroad Publ'ns, Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., No. 93-5270, 1995 WL 358658 (S.D.N.Y. June 14, 1995).
2169	(b)(4), attorney's fees, promise of confidentiality	Indian Law Res. Ctr. v. Dep't of the Interior, 477 F. Supp. 144 (D.D.C. 1979), vacated as moot, No. 79-
2254 (D.C. Cir. July 3, 1980), on motion for attor
ney's fees, 2 GDS ¶81,197 (D.D.C. 1981).
2170	(b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assur
ance of confidentiality, delibera
tive process, law enforcement amendments (1986), waiver of ex
emption	Inducto Therm Corp. v. Adm'r, OSHA, No. 5:95-151 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 1996) (magistrate's recom
mendation), adopted in part (E.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 1996).
2171	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), delibera
tive process, proper party defen
dant	Info. Acquisition Corp. v. DOJ, No. 77-0839 (D. D.C. May 23, 1979).
2172	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7), deliberative process, exhaustion of administra
tive remedies, law enforcement purpose, proper party defendant	Info. Acquisition Corp. v. DOJ, No. 77-0840 (D. D.C. Apr. 7, 1978), on motion for reconsideration (D.D.C. June 6, 1978).
2173	(b)(6), (b)(7)(C), exhaustion of administrative remedies, Vaughn Index	Info. Acquisition Corp. v. DOJ, 444 F. Supp. 458 (D.D.C. 1978).
2174	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), delibera
tive process, proper party defen
dant	Info. Acquisition Corp. v. DOJ, No. 77-0884 (D. D.C. Dec. 7, 1977), summary judgment granted, 3 GDS ¶83,149 (D.D.C. 1981).
2175	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, failure to meet time limits, fees	Info. Acquisition Corp. v. Dep't of State, No. 77-
0921 (D.D.C. Oct. 27, 1977).
2176	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), duty to dis
close, in camera inspection	Ingle v. DOJ, 2 GDS ¶81,238 (M.D. Tenn. 1981), subsequent decision, 2 GDS ¶81,239 (M.D. Tenn. 1981), aff'd in part, rev'd in part & remanded, 698 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1983).
2177	Privacy Act access, mootness	Ingraham v. United States Postal Serv., No. 86-3142 (4th Cir. Apr. 1, 1987) (unpublished memorandum), 816 F.2d 672 (4th Cir. 1987) (table cite), reh'g denied (4th Cir. June 12, 1987).
2178	Dismissal for failure to prosecute	Ingrao v. Executive Office for United States Attor
neys, No. 90-1634 (D.D.C. Apr. 25, 1991), subse
quent order (D.D.C. May 20, 1991).
2179	(b)(7)(A)	Injex Indus. v. NLRB, 699 F. Supp. 1417 (N.D. Cal. 1986).
2180	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(b)(2), summary judgment	Inman v. Comm'r, 871 F. Supp. 1275 (E.D. Cal. 1994).
2181	(b)(4), agency records, duty to search, Vaughn Index	Inner City Press/Cmty. on the Move v. Bd. of Gover
nors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., No. 98-4608, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15333 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 1998), aff'd, No. 98-9604, 1999 WL 464984 (2d Cir. June 22, 1999) (unpublished order), 182 F.3d 900 (2d Cir. 1999) (table cite).
2182	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	In-Place Machining Co. v. TVA, No. 85-C-1005 (E.D. Wis. Sept. 5, 1986).
2183	(b)(1), in camera affidavit	Inside Story/Press & Pub. Project, Inc. v. CIA, No. 84-1311 (D.D.C. Feb. 14, 1985).
2184	(b)(6), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), Vaughn Index	Inst. for Justice & Human Rights v. Executive Office of the United States Attorney, No. C 96-1469, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3709 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 1998).
2185	(b)(2), summary judgment	Inst. for Policy Studies v. Dep't of the Air Force, 676 F. Supp. 3 (D.D.C. 1987).
2186	Attorney's fees	Inst. for Policy Studies v. Dep't of Treasury, No. 92-
0340 (D.D.C. Oct. 23, 1993).
2187	(b)(7)	Inst. for Weight Control, Inc. v. Klassen, 348 F. Supp. 1304 (D.N.J. 1972), aff'd, 474 F.2d 1338 (3d Cir. 1973).
2188	(b)(4), FOIA as a discovery tool	Instrument Sys. Corp. v. United States, 546 F.2d 357 (Ct. Cl. 1976).
2189	Reverse FOIA, (b)(4), promise of confidentiality	Interco, Inc. v. FTC, No. 78-929 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 22, 1978) (case transferred to D.D.C.), subsequent deci
sion, 478 F. Supp. 103 (D.D.C. 1979), remanded, No. 79-1423 (D.C. Cir. May 17, 1979), on remand, 490 F. Supp. 39 (D.D.C. 1979).
2190	Fee waiver (Reform Act), sum
mary judgment	Inter-Hemispheric Educ. Res. Ctr. v. Nat'l Endow
ment for Democracy, No. 89-3275 (D.D.C. June 1, 1990), summary affirmance granted, No. 90-5203 (D.C. Cir. June 12, 1991).
2191	(b)(6)	Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. HUD, 852 F.2d 87 (3d Cir. 1988).
2192	(b)(6)	Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. HUD, 593 F. Supp. 542 (D.D.C. 1984), aff'd, 763 F.2d 435 (D.C. Cir. 1985).
2193	(b)(4), mootness	Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters v. Burnley, No. 89-0124 (D. D.C. Jan. 24, 1990).
2194	Agency records	Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 2 GDS ¶81,276 (D.D.C. 1981), aff'd, 712 F.2d 1495 (D.C. Cir. 1983).
2195	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(e)(7), (b)(7)(A), summary judgment	Int'l Collision Specialists, Inc. v. IRS, No. 93-2500, 1994 WL 395310 (D.N.J. Mar. 2, 1994).
2196	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(4), de novo review, summary judgment	Int'l Computaprint Corp. v. Dep't of Commerce, Nos. 87-1848, 88-0839 (D.D.C. Aug. 16, 1988).
2197	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), 42 U.S.C. §405(r), (b)(6), agency records, summary judgment	Int'l Diatomite Producers Ass'n v. Soc. Sec. Admin., No. C92-1634, 1993 WL 137286 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 1993).
2198	(b)(5), deliberative process	Int'l Paper Co. v. FPC, 438 F.2d 1349 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 827 (1971).
2199	Attorney's fees, duty to create a record, duty to search, no improper withholding, summary judgment	Int'l Trade Overseas, Inc. v. AID, 688 F. Supp. 33 (D.D.C. 1988), attorney's fees denied, No. 87-3102 (D.D.C. Oct. 30, 1992).
2200	(b)(4), summary judgment	Inter Ocean Free Zone, Inc. v. United States Cus
toms Serv., 982 F. Supp. 867 (S.D. Fla. 1997).
2201	(b)(7)(D), assurance of confidenti
ality, waiver of exemption	Interstate Motor Freight Sys. v. Dep't of Labor, 554 F. Supp. 692 (W.D. Mich. 1982).
2202	Proper party defendant, venue	Iowa Packing Co. v. Holm, No. 81-C-6001 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 17, 1982).
2203	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Iriscan, Inc. v. DOE, No. 93-5721 (D.N.J. July 27, 1995).
2204	(b)(2), (b)(7)(D), assurance of con
fidentiality, attorney's fees, fee waiver, improper withholding, law enforcement amendments (1986), waiver of exemption	Irons v. FBI, 571 F. Supp. 1241 (D. Mass. 1983), subsequent decision, No. 82-1143 (D. Mass. Mar. 31, 1986), rev'd & remanded, 811 F.2d 681 (1st Cir. 1987), on remand (D. Mass. Apr. 21, 1987), interim attorney's fees denied, 1987 WL 17541 (D. Mass. June 26, 1987), vacated & remanded, 851 F.2d 532 (1st Cir. 1988), reh'g en banc ordered, No. 87-1516 (1st Cir. Sept. 20, 1988), vacated & remanded, 880 F.2d 1446 (1st Cir. 1989) (en banc).
2205	Privacy Act access, (b)(1), E.O. 11652, (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), adequacy of agency affidavit, adequacy of request, burden of proof, in camera inspection, law enforcement purpose	Irons v. Levi, 451 F. Supp. 751 (D. Mass. 1978), rev'd sub nom. Irons v. Bell, 596 F.2d 468 (1st Cir. 1979), on remand sub nom. Irons v. Civiletti, No. 76-963 (D. Mass. Jan. 21, 1980).
2206	(a)(2), (a)(2)(A), (b)(3), 35 U.S.C. §122, (b)(4), adequacy of request, agency records, fees, reasonably segregable	Irons v. Schuyler, 321 F. Supp. 628 (D.D.C. 1970), aff'd in part, rev'd in part & remanded, 465 F.2d 608 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1076 (1972), on remand sub nom. Irons v. Gottschalk, 369 F. Supp. 403 (D.D.C. 1974), remanded, 548 F.2d 992 (D.C. Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 965 (1977), on remand sub nom. Irons v. Diamond, No. 70-0075 (D.D.C. July 31, 1980), aff'd in part, rev'd in part & remanded, 670 F.2d 265 (D.C. Cir. 1981), dismissed sub nom. Irons v. Mossinghoff, 3 GDS ¶82,383 (D.D.C. 1982).
2207	(b)(4)	Irons & Sears v. Chasen, No. 78-2372 (D.D.C. July 19, 1979).
2208	(b)(3), 35 U.S.C. §122	Irons & Sears v. Dann, 606 F.2d 1215 (D.C. Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1075 (1980).
2209	Adequacy of request	Irvin v. Califano, No. 79-717 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 5, 1980).
2210	Duty to disclose	In re Irving, 600 F.2d 1027 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. de
nied, 444 U.S. 866 (1979).
2211	Agency	Irwin Mem'l Blood Bank v. Am. Nat'l Red Cross, 640 F.2d 1051 (9th Cir. 1981).
2212	(b)(4), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), law en
forcement amendments (1986), law enforcement purpose, promise of confidentiality, reasonably se
gregable, summary judgment	ISC Group, Inc. v. DOD, No. 88-0631, 1989 WL 168858 (D.D.C. May 22, 1989).
2213	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidenti
ality, attorney work-product priv
ilege, deliberative process, law enforcement purpose, reasonably segregable, waiver of exemption	Isley v. Executive Office for United States Attor
neys, No. 96-0123 (D.D.C. Mar. 27, 1996), appeal dismissed, No. 97-5105 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 8, 1997), summary judgment granted (D.D.C. Feb. 25, 1998), aff'd & remanded in part, No. 98-5098, 1999 WL 1021934 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 21, 1999) (unpublished memorandum), 203 F.3d 52 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (table cite), on remand (D.D.C. May 22, 2001).
2214	Attorney's fees, mootness	Isometrics, Inc. v. Orr, No. 85-3066 (D.D.C. Apr. 29, 1986), attorney's fees denied (D.D.C. Feb. 27, 1987).
2215	(b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(D), attor
ney work-product privilege, in
junction of agency proceeding pending resolution of FOIA claim	ITT Am. Elec. v. NLRB, 92 L.R.R.M. 2815 (N.D. Miss. 1976).
2216	(b)(7)(A)	ITT Cont'l Baking Co. v. FTC, 40 Ad. L. 2d (P & F) 183 (D.D.C. 1976).
2217	(b)(4), (b)(5)	ITT Gilfillan, Inc. v. Froehlke, No. 73-416 (D.D.C. June 27, 1973).
2218	(b)(5), attorney-client privilege, deliberative process	ITT World Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 1 GDS ¶80,260 (D.D.C. 1980), amended, 2 GDS ¶81,045 (D.D.C. 1980), aff'd in part, rev'd in part & remand
ed, 699 F.2d 1219 (D.C. Cir. 1983), reh'g en banc denied, Nos. 80-1721, 80-2324, 80-2401 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 6, 1983), rev'd & remanded on other grounds, 466 U.S. 463 (1984), remanded (D.C. Cir. June 12, 1984), dismissed by stipulation, No. 80-0428 (D. D.C. June 29, 1984).
2219	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, §6110, duty to search	IU Int'l Corp. v. Mar. Admin., No. 77-0498 (D.D.C. Dec. 19, 1977).
2220	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 7 U.S.C. §608, (b)(4), (b)(6), discretionary release	Ivanhoe Citrus Ass'n v. Handley, 612 F. Supp. 1560 (D.D.C. 1985).
2221	Vaughn Index	Iverson v. Dep't of State, 2 GDS ¶81,065 (D.D.C. 1981).
2222	(b)(3), (b)(5), deliberative process, inter- or intra-agency memoranda, waiver of exemption	Izzi v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. 84-3030 (D.D.C. Apr. 22, 1985), stay denied (D.D.C. June 7, 1985), rev'd, 804 F.2d 701 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (con
solidated), reh'g denied, 806 F.2d 1122 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (consolidated), cert. granted, judgment vaca
ted & remanded, 486 U.S. 1029 (1988) (consolida
ted).
2223	Summary judgment	Jabara v. Schultz, No. 81-71421 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 15, 1985).
2224	Agency	Jackson v. Cleveland State Univ., No. 90-3409 (6th Cir. Feb. 6, 1991) (unpublished order), 924 F.2d 1058 (6th Cir. 1991) (table cite).
2225	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidentiality, sum
mary judgment	Jackson v. DEA, No. 95-1463 (D.D.C. July 29, 1997).
2226	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7), deliberative process, law enforcement purpose, reasonably segregable, summary judgment	Jackson v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 87-5186 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 5, 1988).
2227	(b)(8), discretionary release, FOIA as a discovery tool	Jackson v. First Fed. Sav., 709 F. Supp. 887 (E.D. Ark. 1989).
2228	(b)(7)(A)	Jackson v. IRS, Nos. 83-0530, 83-0531, 83-0532 (W.D. Va. Sept. 10, 1984).
2229	Agency	Jackson v. Just, 3 GDS ¶82,440 (D.D.C. 1982).
2230	Preliminary injunction	Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Firm v. Dep't of Labor, No. 93-8755 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 1994).
2231	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(b)(2)	Jacobson v. Comm'r, No. 85-4424 (S.D.N.Y. July 28, 1986).
2232	Duty to search	Jacoby v. HUD, No. 95-0893 (D.D.C. July 28, 1995).
2233	Duty to search	Jacoby v. HUD, No. 94-2130 (D.D.C. June 28, 1995).
2234	(b)(6), FOIA/PA interface	Jafari v. Dep't of the Navy, 3 GDS ¶83,250 (E.D. Va. 1983), aff'd, 728 F.2d 247 (4th Cir. 1984).
2235	(b)(1), E.O. 12065, (b)(2), (b)(3), 8 U.S.C. §1202(f), 50 U.S.C. §402, §403(d)(3), §403g, (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), adequacy of agency affidavit, at
torney's fees, de novo review, in camera affidavit, in camera in
spection	Jaffe v. CIA, No. 76-1394 (D.D.C. Apr. 7, 1977), on motion for attorney's fees, 1 GDS ¶79,157 (D.D.C. 1979), subsequent decision, 516 F. Supp. 576 (D. D.C. 1981), limited enlargement of time granted, 520 F. Supp. 124 (D.D.C. 1981), summary judgment granted, 573 F. Supp. 377 (D.D.C. 1983).
2236	Summary judgment	Jaffe v. IRS, 47 A.F.T.R. 2d 81-1109, 2 GDS ¶81, 191 (S.D. Fla. 1981).
2237	Privacy Act access, exhaustion of administrative remedies	Jaffess v. Secretary, HEW, 393 F. Supp. 626 (S.D. N.Y. 1975).
2238	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(E), FOIA/PA in
terface, summary judgment	Jaindl v. Dep't of State, No. 90-1489 (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 1991), summary affirmance granted, No. 91-
5034 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 3, 1992).
2239	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, summary judgment	Jaindl v. FBI, No. 90-1222 (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 1990), summary affirmance granted, 948 F.2d 781 (D.C. Cir. 1991).
2240	(b)(5), (b)(7)(A), attorney work-
product privilege	Jamco Int'l, Inc. v. NLRB, 91 L.R.R.M. 2446 (N.D. Okla. 1976).
2241	(b)(6), FOIA/PA interface	James v. Dep't of the Interior, No. 87-204 (E.D. Okla. June 18, 1987).
2242	(b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assur
ance of confidentiality, law en
forcement amendments (1986), law enforcement purpose	James v. FBI, No. 86-2556 (D.D.C. Aug. 10, 1987), summary affirmance granted, No. 87-5346 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 7, 1988).
2243	(b)(1), E.O. 12958, (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403-3(c)(6), adequacy of agency affidavit, reasonably segre
gable, summary judgment, waiver of exemption	James Madison Project v. NARA, No. 98-2737 (D. D.C. Mar. 5, 2002).
2244	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, (b)(2), (b)(3), 8 U.S.C. §1202(f), (b)(7)(C), ade
quacy of agency affidavit, sum
mary judgment	Jan-Xin Zang v. FBI, 756 F. Supp. 705 (W.D.N.Y. 1991).
2245	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, fee waiver (Reform Act)	Jarmuth v. Reno, No. 96-0188 (D.D.C. July 2, 1996), dismissed (D.D.C. Aug. 23, 1996).
2246	Equitable discretion, status of plaintiff	Javelin Int'l, Ltd. v. DOJ, 2 GDS ¶82,141 (D.D.C. 1981).
2247	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 15 U.S.C. §46(f), agency records	Jaymar-Ruby, Inc. v. FTC, 496 F. Supp. 838 (N.D. Ind. 1980), aff'd, 651 F.2d 506 (7th Cir. 1981).
2248	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Jechura v. DOJ, No. 86-5836 (C.D. Cal. June 2, 1987), appeal dismissed, No. 87-6062 (9th Cir. Dec. 23, 1987).
2249	(b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), deliberative process, "Glomar" de
nial, law enforcement purpose, rea
sonably segregable, summary judg
ment	Jefferson v. DOJ, No. 00-1489 (D.D.C. Nov. 30, 2000), aff'd in part, remanded in part, 284 F.3d 172 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
2250	Duty to search	Jefferson v. FCC, No. 99-0018 (D.D.C. June 15, 1999).
2251	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), duty to search, reason
ably segregable, Vaughn Index, waiver of exemption	Jefferson v. O'Brien, No. 96-1365 (D.D.C. Feb. 22, 2000), summary judgment granted (D.D.C. July 3, 2000).
2252	Privacy Act access, (b)(7)(A), disciplinary proceedings, jurisdic
tion, law enforcement amendments (1986)	Jefferson v. Reno, No. 96-1284, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3064 (D.D.C. Mar. 17, 1997), summary judg
ment denied (D.D.C. Aug. 12, 1997), sanctions granted (D.D.C. Mar. 29, 2000), vacated in part (D. D.C. Mar. 16, 2001).
2253	Privacy Act access, exhaustion of administrative remedies, jurisdic
tion, proper party defendant, pro se litigant	Jefferson v. Zelez, No. 88-3199 (D. Kan. Mar. 19, 1990).
2254	(b)(6), no record within scope of request	Jenkins v. Robinson, No. 80-2344 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 1980).
2255	Attorney's fees, exhaustion of ad
ministrative remedies	Jenks v. United States Marshals Serv., 514 F. Supp. 1383 (S.D. Ohio 1981).
2256	(b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), Vaughn Index	Jenks v. United States Secret Serv., 517 F. Supp. 307 (S.D. Ohio 1981).
2257	Attorney's fees, mootness	Jennings v. Selective Serv. Sys., No. 83-0072 (D. D.C. May 24, 1983), attorney's fees denied (D.D.C. Nov. 23, 1983).
2258	Adequacy of request, fees, fee waiver, jurisdiction	Jenoriki v. Commander of Sea 09B12, Dep't of the Navy, No. 88-1593 (D.D.C. July 29, 1988).
2259	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, mootness	Jerez v. DOJ, No. 94-100 (D. Ariz. Jan. 31, 1995).
2260	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), attorney-
client privilege, deliberative proc
ess, duty to search, Vaughn Index	Jernigan v. Dep't of the Air Force, No. 97-35930, 1998 WL 658662 (9th Cir. Sept. 17, 1998) (unpub
lished memorandum), 163 F.3d 606 (9th Cir. 1998) (table cite).
2261	FOIA as a discovery tool, Vaughn Index	Jernigan v. United States Air Force, No. 95-35191, 1996 WL 285602 (9th Cir. May 29, 1996) (unpub
lished memorandum), 86 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 1996) (table cite).
2262	Fee waiver	Jester v. DOJ, 2 GDS ¶81,027 (D.D.C. 1979).
2263	(b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), attorney work-product privilege, law en
forcement amendments (1986), summary judgment	Jett v. DOJ, No. 93-515 (M.D. Ala. Dec. 20, 1993).
2264	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, (b)(4)	J.H. Lawrence Co. v. Smith, 545 F. Supp. 421 (D. Md. 1982), subsequent decision, Nos. 81-2993, 82-361 (D. Md. Nov. 10, 1982).
2265	(b)(2), (b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), adequacy of request, assurance of confidenti
ality, attorney work-product priv
ilege, deliberative process, duty to search, exceptional circumstances/ due diligence	Jimenez v. FBI, 910 F. Supp. 5 (D.D.C. 1996), par
tial summary judgment granted, 938 F. Supp. 21 (D.D.C. 1996).
2266	(b)(3), 38 U.S.C. §3305, (b)(5), attorney work-product privilege, reasonably segregable	Jochen v. Office of Special Counsel, No. 86-4765 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 1987).
2267	(b)(5), adequacy of agency affida
vit, commercial privilege	Johannson v. DOJ, 2 GDS ¶81,079 (D.D.C. 1981).
2268	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), law enforcement amend
ments (1986), law enforcement purpose, Vaughn Index	John Doe Corp. v. John Doe Agency, 850 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1988), reh'g en banc denied, No. 88-6098 (2d Cir. Nov. 8, 1988), stay denied (2d Cir. Nov. 28, 1988), stay pending cert. denied (2d Cir. Jan. 10, 1989), stay granted, 488 U.S. 1306 (1989), rev'd & remanded, 493 U.S. 146 (1989), reh'g denied, 493 U.S. 1064 (1990).
2269	Mootness, summary judgment	Johnson v. Brock, No. 85-1955 (D.D.C. Dec. 18, 1985), aff'd, No. 86-5122 (D.C. Cir. June 10, 1987) (unpublished memorandum), 819 F.2d 318 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (table cite).
2270	(b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(D), fee waiver (Reform Act), moot
ness, summary judgment, waiver of exemption	Johnson v. DOJ, No. 89-2842 (D.D.C. May 2, 1990), summary judgment granted, 758 F. Supp. 2 (D.D.C. 1991).
2271	(b)(5), (b)(7)(C), attorney work-
product privilege, summary judg
ment, Vaughn Index	Johnson v. DOJ, No. 85-0714 (D.D.C. Mar. 7, 1988), summary judgment granted, 1991 WL 251940 (D.D.C. Nov. 13, 1991).
2272	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), adequacy of agency affidavit, assurance of con
fidentiality	Johnson v. DOJ, 739 F.2d 1514 (10th Cir. 1984).
2273	(b)(7), (b)(7)(D), in camera in
spection, law enforcement pur
pose, reasonably segregable	Johnson v. DOJ, 2 GDS ¶82,041 (D. Or. 1980).
2274	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), attor
ney's fees, referral of request to another agency	Johnson v. DOJ, No. 77-2092 (E.D. La. May 23, 1978).
2275	(b)(7)(C), exhaustion of adminis
trative remedies, in camera in
spection, proper party defendant	Johnson v. DOJ, No. 77-2276 (E.D. La. Apr. 25, 1978).
2276	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidentiality, law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforcement purpose, reason
ably segregable	Johnson v. DEA, No. 97-2231, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9802 (D.D.C. June 25, 1998), summary affirmance denied, No. 98-5468 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 2, 1999).
2277	Proper party defendant, proper service of process	Johnson v. Executive Office for United States Attor
neys, No. 98-729, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6095 (D. D.C. May 2, 2000).
2278	Privacy Act access, exceptional circumstances/due diligence, ex
pedited processing	Johnson v. FBI, No. 94-1741 (D.D.C. Aug. 29, 1995).
2279	(b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, de
liberative process, law enforce
ment amendments (1986), law enforcement purpose, summary judgment, waiver of exemption	Johnson v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 90-H-645, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18358 (N.D. Ala. Nov. 19, 1990).
2280	Agency	Johnson v. Gomez, No. C92-20606 (N.D. Cal. July 19, 1993).
2281	(b)(4), attorney's fees, in camera inspection	Johnson v. HEW, 462 F. Supp. 336 (D.D.C. 1978), on motion for attorney's fees, No. 77-2013 (D.D.C. Nov. 3, 1980).
2282	(b)(5), attorney's fees, deliberative process, summary judgment, waiv
er of exemption	Johnson v. HHS, No. 88-243-5 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 1989) (magistrate's recommendation), attorney's fees denied (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21, 1989) (magistrate's rec
ommendation).
2283	Summary judgment	Johnson v. NSA, No. 86-2546 (D.D.C. June 30, 1987).
2284	Duty to search, jurisdiction, sum
mary judgment	Johnson v. VA, No. 95-C-4909, 1995 WL 745955 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 12, 1995), summary judgment grant
ed, 1996 WL 406645 (N.D. Ill. July 17, 1996).
2285	(b)(5)	Johnson Oil Co. v. DOE, 3 GDS ¶83,089 (D. Utah 1981).
2286	Privacy Act access, (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(F), adequacy of request, agency records, duty to search, waiver of exemption	Johnston v. DOJ, No. 8:96-399 (D. Neb. Mar. 19, 1997) (bench order), aff'd, No. 97-2173, 1998 WL 518529 (8th Cir. Aug. 10, 1998) (unpublished mem
orandum), 163 F.3d 602 (8th Cir. 1998) (table cite).
2287	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, displacement of FOIA, in camera inspection, prop
er party defendant	Johnston v. IRS, No. 82-743 (W.D.N.Y. June 26, 1985), subsequent decision (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 3, 1986).
2288	Exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence, fees (Reform Act), proper party defendant, summary judg
ment	Johnston v. United States, No. 93-5605 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 30, 1994), summary judgment granted, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 597 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 27, 1997).
2289	Agency	Johnston, Davidson & McGeorge v. Council of Econ. Advisers, No. 81-2782 (D.D.C. July 11, 1985).
2290	(b)(4), (b)(5), agency records, at
torney work-product privilege, dis
covery in FOIA litigation, sum
mary judgment	Joint Bd. of Control of the Flathead, Mission & Jocko Irrigation Dists. v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, No. 87-217 (D. Mont. Sept. 9, 1988).
2291	Adequacy of request, dismissal for failure to prosecute, no record within scope of request	Jonak v. CIA, 3 GDS ¶82,474 (E.D. Va. 1980), dis
missed, 3 GDS ¶82,502 (E.D. Va. 1981), aff'd, 3 GDS ¶82,516 (4th Cir. 1982) (unpublished memo
randum), 681 F.2d 814 (4th Cir. 1982) (table cite).
2292	Adequacy of request, exhaustion of administrative remedies	Jonak v. CIA, No. 78-401 (E.D. Va. Oct. 23, 1978).
2293	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Jones v. DOJ, No. 94-2294 (D. Md. Jan. 18, 1995).
2294	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, (b)(2), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), adequacy of agency affidavit, as
surance of confidentiality, discov
ery in FOIA litigation, in camera inspection, law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforce
ment purpose, proper party de
fendant, summary judgment, Vaughn Index, waiver of exemp
tion	Jones v. FBI, No. C77-1001 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 14, 1983), subsequent order (N.D. Ohio Nov. 23, 1983), summary judgment granted (N.D. Ohio June 2, 1991) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted (N.D. Ohio Aug. 12, 1992), aff'd, 41 F.3d 238 (6th Cir. 1994).
2295	Privacy Act access, (b)(5), delib
erative process, no record within scope of request	Jones v. MSPB, Nos. 85-0-49, 85-0-722 (D. Neb. Sept. 5, 1986), aff'd sub nom. Jones v. Farm Credit Admin., No. 86-2243 (8th Cir. Apr. 13, 1987) (un
published memorandum), 822 F.2d 1092 (8th Cir. 1987) (table cite), reh'g denied (8th Cir. May 12, 1987).
2296	Jurisdiction	Jones v. NRC, 654 F. Supp. 130 (D.D.C. 1987).
2297	Attorney's fees, displacement of FOIA, equitable discretion	Jones v. OSHA, No. 94-3225 (W.D. Mo. June 6, 1995).
2298	Duty to search, no record within scope of request	Jones v. Runyon, 32 F. Supp. 2d 873 (N.D. W. Va. 1998), aff'd, 173 F.3d 850 (4th Cir. 1999) (table cite).
2299	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Jones v. Shalala, 887 F. Supp. 210 (S.D. Iowa 1995).
2300	Attorney's fees, pro se litigant	Jones v. United States Secret Serv., 81 F.R.D. 700 (D.D.C. 1979).
2301	(a)(2), (a)(2)(C), (b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(7)(E), attorney work-product privilege, attorney's fees, deliber
ative process, interaction of (a)(2) & (a)(3), waiver of exemption (failure to assert in litigation)	Jordan v. DOJ, No. 76-0276 (D.D.C. Jan. 18, 1977), aff'd on other grounds, 591 F.2d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (en banc), attorney's fees denied, 89 F.R.D. 537 (D.D.C. 1981), rev'd & remanded, 691 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1982).
2302	(b)(5), attorney's fees, commercial privilege, deliberative process, in
ter- or intra-agency memoranda, stay pending appeal	Jordan, Gresham, Varner, Savage & Nolan v. Dep't of the Interior, No. 80-97 (C.D. Cal. May 19, 1980).
2303	(b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), attorney work-product privilege, deliberative process	Joseph Horne Co. v. NLRB, 455 F. Supp. 1383 (W.D. Pa. 1978).
2304	Reverse FOIA, (b)(3), Fed.R. Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(7), stay pending appeal, waiver of exemption (fail
ure to assert in litigation)	Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. SEC, 548 F. Supp. 6 (D. D.C. 1982), stay denied, 2 GDS ¶82,246 (D.D.C. 1982), aff'd, No. 82-1256 (D.C. Cir. June 30, 1982) (unpublished memorandum), 684 F.2d 1032 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (table cite).
2305	(b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assur
ance of confidentiality, attorney's fees, deliberative process, law en
forcement amendments (1986)	Joslin v. Dep't of Labor, No. 86-2449 (D. Colo. May 9, 1988), rev'd & remanded, Nos. 88-1999, 88-2064 (10th Cir. Oct. 20, 1989).
2306	(b)(6), summary judgment	Journal-Gazette Co. v. Dep't of the Army, No. 89-
147 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 8, 1990).
2307	(b)(2), (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §1905, 49 U.S.C. §11910, (b)(4), (b)(5), dis
covery in FOIA litigation, moot
ness, "mosaic," reasonably segre
gable, summary judgment, Vaughn Index, waiver of exemption	Journal of Commerce, Inc. v. Dep't of the Treasury, No. 86-1075 (D.D.C. Oct. 10, 1986), summary judg
ment granted in part, 1987 WL 4922 (D.D.C. June 1, 1987), on renewed motion for summary judgment, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17610 (D.D.C. Mar. 30, 1988), appeal transferred to Federal Circuit, No. 88-
5194 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 22, 1988), aff'd, 878 F.2d 1446 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (per curiam).
2308	(b)(5), adequacy of agency affida
vit, deliberative process, in camera inspection, reasonably segregable, summary judgment	Jowett, Inc. v. Dep't of the Navy, No. 89-0091 (D. D.C. May 31, 1989), summary judgment granted, 729 F. Supp. 871 (D.D.C. 1989).
2309	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), summary judgment	Joya-Martinez v. FBI, No. 91-1433 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 1994).
2310	(b)(7)(C), duty to search, reason
ably segregable, summary judg
ment	Joyce v. FBI, 152 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 2001).
2311	(b)(3), 42 U.S.C. §2000e-5(b), §2000e-8(e), (b)(7)(A), FOIA as a discovery tool	J.P. Stevens & Co. v. Perry, 710 F.2d 136 (4th Cir. 1983).
2312	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	J.P. Stevens Employees Educ. Comm. v. NLRB, 582 F.2d 326 (4th Cir. 1978).
2313	(b)(7), summary judgment	J. Roderick MacArthur Found. v. FBI, No. 90-2906 (D.D.C. Sept. 6, 1995).
2314	(b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), attorney work-product privilege, exhaustion of administrative remedies, in camera inspection, no record with
in scope of request	Juda v. DOJ, No. 94-1521 (D.D.C. Mar. 27, 1996), on in camera inspection (D.D.C. Apr. 16, 1996).
2315	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(E), duty to search, reasonably segregable, summary judgment, Vaughn Index	Juda v. United States Customs Serv., No. 98-0533, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12536 (D.D.C. Aug. 3, 1999), summarily rev'd & remanded, No. 99-5333, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 17985 (D.C. Cir. June 19, 2000).
2316	(b)(5), deliberative process, duty to search, Vaughn Index	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Clinton, 880 F. Supp. 1 (D. D.C. 1995).
2317	(b)(1), E.O. 12958, (b)(5), (b)(6), attorney-client privilege, delibera
tive process, discovery in FOIA litigation, in camera inspection, reasonably segregable, Vaughn Index	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Comm'n on United States -
Pac. Trade & Inv. Policy, No. 97-0099 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 1999).
2318	(b)(1), E.O. 12958, (b)(2), (b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403g, (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), attorney-client privilege, deliberative process, discovery in FOIA litigation, duty to search, fee waiver (Reform Act), improper withholding, in camera inspection, reasonably segregable, Vaughn Index	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Dep't of Commerce, No. 95-
0133 (D.D.C. May 16, 1995), summary judgment denied (D.D.C. Feb. 1, 1996), summary judgment granted in part (D.D.C. Sept. 5, 1996), subsequent opinion, 34 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 1998), further discovery ordered, 34 F. Supp. 2d 47 (D.D.C. 1998), partial summary judgment granted, 83 F. Supp. 2d 105 (D.D.C. 1999), on in camera inspection, 90 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 2000), discovery granted, 127 F. Supp. 2d 228 (D.D.C. 2000), protective order de
nied, 201 F.R.D. 265 (D.D.C. 2001).
2319	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DOE, 191 F. Supp. 2d 138 (D.D.C. 2002).
2320	Fee waiver (Reform Act)	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DOJ, Nos. 1:01-0639, 1:01-
0720 (D.D.C. Mar. 22, 2002).
2321	Discovery in FOIA litigation, duty to search, fee waiver (Reform Act)	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DOJ, 185 F. Supp. 2d 54 (D. D.C. 2002).
2322	Summary judgment	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DOJ, 159 F. Supp. 2d 763 (D.D.C. 2001), amended, No. 01-0212 (D.D.C. Oct. 19, 2001).
2323	(b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), adequacy of agency affidavit, assurance of confidentiality, duty to search, exhaustion of administrative remedies, fee waiver (Reform Act), in camera inspection, reason
ably segregable	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DOJ, No. 00-745 (D.D.C. Feb. 12, 2001), summary judgment granted in part sub nom. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. FBI (D.D.C. Apr. 20, 2001).
2324	Fee waiver (Reform Act)	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DOJ, 133 F. Supp. 2d 52 (D. D.C. 2000), appeal dismissed sua sponte, No. 01-
5019 (D.C. Cir. June 13, 2001).
2325	Fees (media requesters), fee waiver (Reform Act)	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DOJ, 122 F. Supp. 2d 13 (D. D.C. 2000).
2326	(b)(6), (b)(7)(C), de novo review, fees (media requesters), fee waiver (Reform Act), "Glomar" denial	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DOJ, 122 F. Supp. 2d 5 (D. D.C. 2000), partial summary judgment granted, No. 99-1039 (D.D.C. Sept. 13, 2001)
2327	Fees (media requesters), fee waiver (Reform Act)	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DOJ, No. 99-2315, 2000 WL 33724693 (D.D.C. Aug. 17, 2000).
2328	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), deliberative process, duty to search, exceptional cir
cumstances/due diligence, expedi
ted processing, fee waiver (Reform Act), waiver of exemption	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DOJ, No. 97-2869 (D.D.C. Aug. 25, 1998), partial summary judgment granted, 102 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D.D.C. 2000).
2329	Fee waiver (Reform Act), jurisdic
tion	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DOJ, No. 97-2089 (D.D.C. July 14, 1998).
2330	Exceptional circumstances/due dil
igence, expedited processing	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Dep't of State, No. 99-1130 (D.D.C. Feb. 17, 2000).
2331	(b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), adequacy of request, attorney-client privilege, deliberative process, discovery in FOIA litigation, duty to search, reasonably segregable, Vaughn Index	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Exp.-Imp. Bank, 108 F. Supp. 2d 19 (D.D.C. 2000).
2332	Exhaustion of administrative reme
dies, jurisdiction, proper party de
fendant	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. FBI, 190 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D. D.C. 2002).
2333	Fee waiver (Reform Act)	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. GSA, No. 98-2223 (D.D.C. Sept. 25, 2000).
2334	Duty to search	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. GSA, No. 99-1859 (D.D.C. Feb. 18, 2000).
2335	(b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), duty to search, reasonably segregable	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. HHS, 27 F. Supp. 2d 240 (D.D.C. 1998).
2336	(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confiden
tiality, attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product privilege, deliberative process, duty to search, fee waiver (Reform Act), law enforcement purpose, reason
ably segregable	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Reno, No. 00-723 (D.D.C. Mar. 30, 2001), subsequent order, 154 F. Supp. 2d 17 (D.D.C. 2001).
2337	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, fees (media requesters), fee waiver (Reform Act)	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Rossotti, No. 01-1612, 2002 WL 535803 (D.D.C. Mar. 18, 2002).
2338	Duty to search, exhaustion of ad
ministrative remedies, expedited processing, jurisdiction	Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Naval Observa
tory, 160 F. Supp. 2d 111 (D.D.C. 2001).
2339	Duty to search	Judy Diamond Assocs. v. IRS, No. 96-02700, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19534 (D.D.C. Oct. 21, 1998).
2340	(b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §4208(c), Fed.R. Crim.P. 32, (b)(5), deliberative process, displacement of FOIA, reasonably segregable, waiver of exemption	Julian v. DOJ, 806 F.2d 1411 (9th Cir. 1986), aff'd, 486 U.S. 1 (1988).
2341	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, burden of proof	Juliano v. IRS, No. C78-1070 (N.D. Ga. June 28, 1979).
2342	(b)(5), attorney-client privilege, deliberative process, discovery/ FOIA interface	Jupiter Painting Contracting Co. v. United States, 87 F.R.D. 593 (E.D. Pa. 1980).
2343	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, pro se litigant	Jurgins v. Dep't of State, No. 85-3390 (D.D.C. Mar. 25, 1986) (consolidated), dismissed (D.D.C. Apr. 29, 1986).
2344	Mootness, pro se litigant	Jurgins v. Dep't of the Navy, No. 85-3542 (D.D.C. Mar. 25, 1986) (consolidated), dismissed as moot (D.D.C. Apr. 29, 1986).
2345	Privacy Act access, duty to create a record, mootness	Jurgins v. Dep't of the Navy, No. 83-1227 (D.D.C. Jan. 20, 1984), aff'd, No. 84-5115 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 30, 1984) (unpublished memorandum), 748 F.2d 714 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (table cite).
2346	Dismissal for failure to prosecute	Jurgins v. HHS, No. 85-3655 (D.D.C. June 3, 1986).
2347	(b)(7)(C), no record within scope of request	Jurney v. IRS, No. 90-1054 (D. Colo. Aug. 10, 1992).
2348	(b)(7)(D), law enforcement amend
ments (1986), summary judgment	Jurosek v. FBI, No. 88-60309 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 28, 1989).
2349	(b)(7)(A), Vaughn Index	Kacilauskas v. DOJ, 565 F. Supp. 546 (N.D. Ill. 1983).
2350	(b)(2), exhaustion of administra
tive remedies	Kaganove v. EPA, 664 F. Supp. 352 (N.D. Ill. 1987), rev'd, 856 F.2d 884 (7th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1011 (1989).
2351	(b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), duty to search, law enforcement purpose	Kahle v. DOJ, No. 87-5198 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 29, 1988).
2352	(a)(1)(D), publication	Kahn v. United States, 753 F.2d 1208 (3d Cir. 1985).
2353	(b)(6)	Kalama v. United States, No. C 96-0611, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19594 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 1996).
2354	(b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6)	Kall v. SBA, 3 GDS ¶82,325 (N.D.N.Y. 1981).
2355	Privacy Act access, (b)(5), (b)(6), deliberative process, FOIA/PA in
terface, personal records	Kalmin v. Dep't of the Navy, 605 F. Supp. 1492 (D. D.C. 1985).
2356	(b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), agency records, assurance of con
fidentiality, in camera inspection	Kaminer v. NLRB, 90 L.R.R.M. 2269 (S.D. Miss. 1975).
2357	Duty to disclose, exhaustion of ad
ministrative remedies	Kaminskas v. DOJ, No. 76-511 (D. Conn. Jan. 11, 1978).
2358	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Kaminski v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, No. 75-458 (W.D. N.Y. June 29, 1977).
2359	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), §6103(b)(2), adequacy of agency affidavit, summary judgment	Kamman v. IRS, No. 91-1352 (D. Ariz. Mar. 12, 1992), reconsideration denied (D. Ariz. July 7, 1993), rev'd & remanded, 56 F.3d 46 (9th Cir. 1995).
2360	Reverse FOIA, (b)(4)	Kan. Gas & Elec. Co. v. NRC, No. 87-2748 (D.D.C. June 30, 1993).
2361	(b)(7), (b)(7)(A), fee waiver (Re
form Act), law enforcement pur
pose, waiver of exemption	Kansi v. DOJ, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42 (D.D.C. 1998).
2362	(b)(1), E.O. 12065, (b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(E), in camera inspection	Kanter v. Dep't of State, No. 78-0077 (D.D.C. May 31, 1979), summary judgment granted, 479 F. Supp. 921 (D.D.C. 1979).
2363	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, Fed.R. Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product privilege, deliberative process, displacement of FOIA	Kanter v. IRS, 496 F. Supp. 1004 (N.D. Ill. 1980).
2364	(b)(2), (b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, (b)(5), (b)(7), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), burden of proof, FOIA as a discovery tool, in camera affidavit	Kanter v. IRS, 433 F. Supp. 812 (N.D. Ill. 1977), dismissed, 478 F. Supp. 552 (N.D. Ill. 1979).
2365	(b)(3), 50 U.S.C. §403(d)(3), §403g, (b)(6), de novo review, "Glomar" denial, proper party de
fendant, summary judgment	Kapsa v. CIA, No. C2-78-1062 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 6, 1985).
2366	Jurisdiction	Kardash v. Comm'r, No. 82-3126 (D.D.C. Nov. 18, 1982).
2367	Publication	Karpowycz v. United States, 586 F. Supp. 48 (N.D. Ill. 1984).
2368	(b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, summary judg
ment, Vaughn Index	Karu v. DOJ, No. 86-0771 (D.D.C. Dec. 1, 1987).
2369	(a)(1), publication	Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Sec'y of Labor, 268 F.3d 1123 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
2370	(b)(6), FOIA/PA interface	Kassel v. VA, 709 F. Supp. 1194 (D.N.H. 1989).
2371	(b)(5), inter- or intra-agency mem
oranda, stay pending appeal	Katsougrakis v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. 85-3259 (D.D.C. Dec. 11, 1985), dismissed (D.D.C. Sept. 17, 1986).
2372	Res judicata	Katz v. DOJ, 596 F. Supp. 196 (E.D. Mo. 1984), aff'd, 767 F.2d 930 (8th Cir. 1985).
2373	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), attor
ney's fees	Katz v. DOJ, 498 F. Supp. 177 (S.D.N.Y. 1979).
2374	(b)(3), 28 U.S.C. §534, Fed.R. Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), attorney work-product privilege, FOIA as a discovery tool, law enforcement amendments (1986), Vaughn Index	Katz v. FBI, No. 87-3712 (5th Cir. Mar. 30, 1988) (unpublished memorandum), 844 F.2d 786 (5th Cir. 1988) (table cite).
2375	(b)(6), agency records, summary judgment	Katz v. NARA, 862 F. Supp. 476 (D.D.C. 1994), re
consideration denied, No. 92-1024 (D.D.C. Aug. 24, 1994), aff'd, 68 F.3d 1438 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
2376	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, (b)(2), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), as
surance of confidentiality, attor
ney's fees, in camera inspection, law enforcement purpose, proper party defendant	Katz v. Webster, No. 82-1092 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 1983), subsequent decision (S.D.N.Y. May 20, 1985), attorney's fees granted (S.D.N.Y. May 21, 1987), attorney's fees awarded (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 1990).
2377	Duty to search	Katzman v. CIA, 903 F. Supp. 434 (E.D.N.Y. 1995).
2378	Adequacy of request, discovery in FOIA litigation, duty to search	Katzman v. Sessions, 156 F.R.D. 35 (E.D.N.Y. 1994), reconsideration denied sub nom. Katzman v. Freeh, 926 F. Supp. 316 (E.D.N.Y. 1996).
2379	Fee waiver, jurisdiction	Kaufman v. United States, No. 78-910 (D. Md. Apr. 10, 1979).
2380	(a)(2)(B), (b)(5), deliberative process, incorporation by refer
ence, reasonably segregable	Kay v. Dep't of State, 3 GDS ¶83,247 (N.D. Tex. 1983).
2381	(b)(7), (b)(7)(A), FOIA as a dis
covery tool, in camera inspection, law enforcement purpose, sum
mary judgment, Vaughn Index	Kay v. FCC, 976 F. Supp. 23 (D.D.C. 1997), aff'd, 172 F.3d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (table cite).
2382	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Kay v. FCC, 884 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1995).
2383	(b)(7), (b)(7)(A), law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforce
ment purpose, preliminary injunc
tion, waiver of exemption	Kay v. FCC, No. 94-1105 (D.D.C. June 30, 1994), summary judgment granted, 867 F. Supp. 11 (D.D.C. 1994).
2384	(b)(7), (b)(8), attorney's fees, mootness	Kaye v. Burns, 411 F. Supp. 897 (S.D.N.Y. 1976).
2385	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E)	Kazonis v. Bell, 1 GDS ¶79,189 (D.D.C. 1979).
2386	No record within scope of request	Kazonis v. Stutely, 1 GDS ¶79,113 (D.D.C. 1979).
2387	(b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), agency records, assurance of confidenti
ality, deliberative process, duty to search, summary judgment	KDKA-TV v. Thornburgh, No. 90-1536, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22438 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 1992).
2388	(b)(5)	Kearns v. Kreps, No. 77-1668 (D.D.C. June 22, 1978).
2389	(b)(7), (b)(7)(A), law enforcement purpose, summary judgment	Keen v. Executive Office for United States Attor
neys, No. 96-1049 (D.D.C. July 14, 1999) (magis
trate's recommendation), adopted (D.D.C. Mar. 23, 2000).
2390	Transfer of FOIA case, venue	Keen v. FBI, No. C 97-2657, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16220 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 1997).
2391	Privacy Act access, (b)(1), E.O. 12356, E.O. 12958, (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), adequacy of request, assurance of confidentiality, duty to search, summary judgment, Vaughn Index	Keenan v. DOJ, No. 94-1909 (D.D.C. Apr. 24, 1996), reconsideration denied (D.D.C. Nov. 12, 1996), summary judgment granted in part (D.D.C. Mar. 24, 1997), renewed motion for summary judg
ment granted in part (D.D.C. Dec. 16, 1997).
2392	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), §6103(b)(2), adequacy of request, waiver of exemption	Keenen v. IRS, No. 94-7622 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 1995).
2393	(b)(2), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), duty to search, proper party defendant	Keeney v. FBI, No. 76-396 (D. Conn. Oct. 2, 1979), rev'd & remanded, 630 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1980), on remand (D. Conn. Mar. 3, 1982).
2394	Adequacy of request, exhaustion of administrative remedies, Vaughn Index	Keese v. United States, 632 F. Supp. 85 (S.D. Tex. 1985).
2395	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(b)(2), duty to search, mootness	Kefalos v. IRS, No. C-2-97-117, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5974 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 3, 1998), summary judgment granted, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10432 (S.D. Ohio May 19, 1998).
2396	Privacy Act access, (b)(5), (b)(7)(D), deliberative process, ex
haustion of administrative reme
dies, law enforcement amendments (1986)	Kele v. DOJ, No. 86-0796 (D.D.C. Nov. 6, 1987) (magistrate's recommendation), motion to vacate judgment denied (D.D.C. June 9, 1988) (magistrate's recommendation).
2397	(b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), ade
quacy of agency affidavit, attor
ney-client privilege, attorney work-
product privilege, proper party defendant, summary judgment	Kele v. DOJ, No. 86-1795 (D.D.C. Nov. 4, 1987) (magistrate's recommendation), summary judgment granted (D.D.C. Feb. 29, 1988) (magistrate's rec
ommendation), adopted (D.D.C. Mar. 15, 1988).
2398	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(F), summary judgment	Kele v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. 92-1302 (D.D.C. Aug. 18, 1992).
2399	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, proper party defendant	Kele v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. 85-4058 (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 1986).
2400	In camera inspection, proper party defendant	Kellogg Co. v. FTC, 2 GDS ¶81,301 (D.D.C. 1981).
2401	(b)(1), E.O. 12065, (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), agency	Kelly v. FBI, 2 GDS ¶82,059 (D.D.C. 1981).
2402	Attorney's fees, duty to search	Kempker-Cloyd v. DOJ, No. 5:97-253, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4813 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 12, 1999), at
torney's fees awarded (W.D. Mich. Apr. 2, 1999) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted (W.D. Mich. Aug. 17, 1999).
2403	(b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), in camera inspection	Kemple v. DOJ/DEA, No. C2-83-1566 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 7, 1984), summary judgment granted (S.D. Ohio Oct. 23, 1984), amended (S.D. Ohio Feb. 8, 1985).
2404	Attorney's fees	Kendland Co. v. Dep't of the Navy, 599 F. Supp. 936 (D. Me. 1984).
2405	(b)(3), 18 U.S.C. §§2511-2518(8), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(5), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), attorney work-product privilege, duty to search, reasonably segregable, summary judgment	Kendrick v. Executive Office for United States At
torneys, No. 00-1809 (D.D.C. June 14, 2001).
2406	Privacy Act access, (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product privilege, deliberative process, duty to search, exhaustion of administrative remedies, no record within scope of request	Kenemore v. DOJ, No. 99-0500 (D.D.C. Sept. 28, 2000), summary judgment granted in part (D.D.C. Mar. 27, 2001).
2407	(a)(1), (a)(1)(D), (a)(2), publica
tion	Kennecott Utah Copper Corp. v. Dep't of the Inte
rior, 88 F.3d 1191 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
2408	(b)(5), attorney's fees	Kennecott Utah Copper Corp. v. EPA, No. 94-0162 (D.D.C. Sept. 11, 1995).
2409	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Kennedy v. DOJ, No. 93-0209 (D.D.C. July 12, 1993).
2410	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), law enforcement amend
ments (1986), summary judgment	Kennedy v. DEA, No. 92-2731 (D.D.C. Feb. 28, 1994).
2411	Attorney's fees	Kennedy v. OPM, No. 84-1523 (D.D.C. Oct. 5, 1984).
2412	(a)(2)(A), (a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), (b)(5), attorney work-product priv
ilege	Kent Corp. v. NLRB, No. 73-M-1090 (N.D. Ala. Feb. 27, 1974), rev'd, 530 F.2d 612 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 920 (1976).
2413	Jurisdiction	Kerase v. Comm'r, No. 82-3058 (D.D.C. Nov. 18, 1982).
2414	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, (b)(2), (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, proper party defen
dant, Vaughn Index	Kern v. FBI, No. 94-0208 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 1998).
2415	(b)(2), (b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confidentiality, Vaughn Index	Kerner v. Dep't of the Treasury, 1 GDS ¶79,228 (D. D.C. 1979), supplemental Vaughn Index ordered, 1 GDS ¶80,261 (D.D.C. 1980), on motion for sum
mary judgment, 1 GDS ¶80,244 (D.D.C. 1980).
2416	Agency, FOIA as a discovery tool	Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 511 F.2d 192 (9th Cir. 1975), aff'd on other grounds, 426 U.S. 394 (1976).
2417	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies, jurisdiction	Kessler v. United States, No. 94-0402 (D.D.C. May 3, 1994), dismissed, 899 F. Supp. 644 (D.D.C. 1995).
2418	Discovery in FOIA litigation, sum
mary judgment	Key v. Attorney Gen. of the United States, No. 94-
0916 (D.D.C. Dec. 23, 1994).
2419	(b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), attorney-
client privilege, attorney work-
product privilege, deliberative process	Key Bank v. SBA, No. 91-362, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22180 (D. Me. Dec. 31, 1992).
2420	(b)(1), E.O. 12356, (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confidentiality, law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforcement purpose, Vaughn Index	Keys v. DOJ, No. 85-2588 (D.D.C. May 12, 1986), aff'd, 830 F.2d 337 (D.C. Cir. 1987).
2421	(b)(1), (b)(2), in camera inspection	Kiareldeen v. INS, No. 98-4693 (D.N.J. Jan. 9, 2001).
2422	Dismissal for failure to prosecute	Kibbe v. VA, No. 01-2144, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6513 (6th Cir. Apr. 4, 2002).
2423	Adequacy of agency affidavit, dis
covery in FOIA litigation, duty to search	Kidd v. Dep't of the Interior, No. 91-15321 (9th Cir. Aug. 31, 1992) (unpublished memorandum), 974 F.2d 1342 (9th Cir. 1992) (table cite), on remand, No. 90-0272 (D. Nev. Apr. 14, 1993), aff'd, No. 93-
15925 (9th Cir. Mar. 1, 1994) (unpublished memo
randum), 19 F.3d 1440 (9th Cir. 1994) (table cite).
2424	Pro se litigant	Kight v. United States Postal Serv., No. 78-149 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 2, 1979).
2425	(b)(5), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidenti
ality, attorney work-product priv
ilege, deliberative process, inter- or intra-agency memoranda, reason
ably segregable, waiver of exemp
tion	Kilroy v. NLRB, 633 F. Supp. 136 (S.D. Ohio 1985), aff'd, No. 86-3033 (6th Cir. July 15, 1987) (unpub
lished memorandum), 823 F.2d 553 (6th Cir. 1987) (table cite).
2426	Adequacy of request, exhaustion of administrative remedies	Kim v. DOJ, No. 85-C-4540 (N.D. Ill. July 23, 1986).
2427	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6130(a), duty to search, no improper withholding, no record within scope of request	Kim v. IRS, No. 99-2096, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20612 (D. Md. Dec. 28, 1999).
2428	(b)(7), (b)(7)(C), law enforcement purpose, waiver of exemption	Kimberlin v. DOJ, 921 F. Supp. 833 (D.D.C. 1996), aff'd in part & remanded in part, 139 F.3d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 891 (1998).
2429	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), assurance of confidentiality, in camera inspec
tion, res judicata, waiver of ex
emption (failure to assert in litiga
tion)	Kimberlin v. Dep't of the Treasury, 774 F.2d 204 (7th Cir. 1985).
2430	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(3), 5 U.S.C. §552a(j)(2), §552a(k)(2), (b)(7), adequacy of agency affida
vit, FOIA/PA interface	Kimberlin v. United States Customs Serv., No. 82-
1505 (S.D. Ind. July 22, 1983).
2431	Jurisdiction	King v. Califano, 471 F. Supp. 180 (D.D.C. 1979).
2432	(b)(1), E.O. 12065, (b)(7), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), adequacy of agency affidavit, assurance of con
fidentiality, law enforcement amendments (1986), law enforce
ment purpose, Vaughn Index	King v. DOJ, 2 GDS ¶81,277 (D.D.C. 1981), sum
mary judgment granted, 586 F. Supp. 286 (D.D.C. 1983), aff'd in part & remanded in part, 830 F.2d 210 (D.C. Cir. 1987).
2433	Duty to search, no record within scope of request	King v. FBI, 3 GDS ¶82,324 (N.D. Ill. 1981).
2434	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, (b)(5), attorney-client privilege, deliber
ative process, displacement of FOIA, waiver of exemption (fail
ure to assert in litigation)	King v. IRS, 2 GDS ¶82,113 (N.D. Ill. 1981), recon
sideration denied, 3 GDS ¶83,071 (N.D. Ill. 1981) (on Exemption 5 issue), partial summary judgment granted, 3 GDS ¶83,072 (N.D. Ill. 1981) (on Exemp
tion 3 issue), rev'd, 684 F.2d 517 (7th Cir. 1982) (on Exemption 5 issue), rev'd, 688 F.2d 488 (7th Cir. 1982) (on Exemption 3 issue).
2435	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(b)(2), adequacy of request	King v. IRS, 49 A.F.T.R. 2d 82-403, 2 GDS ¶82,097 (N.D. Ill. 1981).
2436	(a)(2), publication	King v. Reich, No. 97-35568, 1998 WL 483007 (9th Cir. Aug. 12, 1998) (unpublished memorandum), 156 F.3d 1237 (9th Cir. 1998) (table cite).
2437	(b)(2), (b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103, 28 U.S.C. §534, (b)(6), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), attorney's fees, FOIA/ PA interface, in camera inspection, waiver of exemption	Kiraly v. FBI, 3 GDS ¶82,465 (N.D. Ohio 1982), motion to amend denied, 3 GDS ¶82,466 (N.D. Ohio 1982), aff'd, 728 F.2d 273 (6th Cir. 1984).
2438	(b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), adequacy of agency affidavit, attorney's fees, FOIA as a discovery tool, law en
forcement amendments (1986), waiver of exemption	Kirk v. DOJ, 704 F. Supp. 288 (D.D.C. 1989).
2439	Summary judgment	Kirk v. United States, No. 97-648, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18534 (D. Ariz. Oct. 29, 1998).
2440	(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §6103(a), duty to search, summary judgment	Kirk v. United States, No. 96-1415, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14005 (D. Ariz. Aug. 14, 1998).
2441	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(7)(A), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(F), assurance of confidenti
ality, dismissal for failure to prose
cute, duty to search, law enforce
ment amendments (1986), sum
mary judgment	Kitchen v. DEA, No. 93-2035 (D.D.C. Oct. 11, 1995), dismissed for failure to prosecute, No. 95-
5380 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 11, 1996).
2442	Privacy Act access, (b)(2), (b)(3), Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(D), (b)(7)(E), assurance of confidentiality, dismissal for failure to prosecute, duty to search, reasonably segregable	Kitchen v. FBI, No. 93-2382 (D.D.C. Mar. 18, 1996), dismissed for failure to prosecute (D.D.C. Apr. 15, 1997).
2443	Summary judgment	Kitchen v. IRS, No. 94-1115 (D.D.C. Mar. 7, 1996).
2444	(b)(5), attorney's fees, attorney work-product privilege, delibera
tive process, fee waiver (Reform Act), inter- or intra-agency memo
randa, reasonably segregable	Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n v. Dep't of the Interior, No. 96-3077 (D. Or. June 19, 1997) (magistrate's recommendation), adopted (D. Or. Oct. 16, 1997), rev'd, 189 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 1999), reh'g denied, No. 97-36208 (9th Cir. Dec. 22, 1999), aff'd, 532 U.S. 1 (2001), attorney's fees denied, 18 Fed. Appx. 473 (9th Cir. 2001).
2445	(b)(1), attorney's fees, in camera inspection	Klaus v. Blake, 428 F. Supp. 37 (D.D.C. 1976), at
torney's fees awarded sub nom. Klaus v. CIA, No. 76-1274 (D.D.C. Jan. 18, 1977).
2446	(b)(1), (b)(3)	Klaus v. NSC, No. 75-1093 (D.D.C. Oct. 22, 1976).
2447	Exhaustion of administrative rem
edies	Klayman & Assocs. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, No. 95-0009 (D.D.C. Apr. 18, 1995).
2448	(b)(4), reasonably segregable, sum
mary judgment	Klayman & Gurley v. Dep't of Commerce, No. 88-
0783, 1990 WL 446704 (D.D.C. Apr. 17, 1990).
2449	(b)(5), attorney work-product priv
ilege, summary judgment	Klayman & Gurley v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, No. 84-3084 (D.D.C. Apr. 7, 1987).